Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Dirichlet function is the pointwise limit of a sequence of Baire class one functions and is itself not Baire class one, so the Baire hierarchy on [0,1][0,1] is already strict at the first level

Example

Let D:[0,1]RD : [0,1] \to \mathbb{R} be the restriction to [0,1][0,1] (Intervals of R\mathbb{R}: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) of the Dirichlet function (The Dirichlet function 1Q1_{\mathbb{Q}}, and Thomae's function tt with t(x)=1/qt(x) = 1/q at a rational x=p/qx = p/q in lowest terms with q1q \ge 1 and t(x)=0t(x) = 0 at every irrational xx), so D(x)=1D(x) = 1 at a rational xx and D(x)=0D(x) = 0 at an irrational xx. Then:

  1. DD is the pointwise limit on [0,1][0,1] of a sequence (gm)mN(g_m)_{m \in \mathbb{N}} of functions each of which is of Baire class one on [0,1][0,1] (Pointwise convergence of a sequence of real functions, and the Baire class one functions as the pointwise limits of sequences of continuous functions), namely the indicators of the finite sets {s(0),,s(m)}\{s(0), \dots, s(m)\} for a fixed surjection s:NQ[0,1]s : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{Q} \cap [0,1];
  2. DD is not of Baire class one on [0,1][0,1].

So the class of pointwise limits of sequences of Baire class one functions is strictly larger than the class of Baire class one functions. That larger class is classically called Baire class two; no definition of it is given in this library and none is used, the statement above being phrased entirely in terms of pointwise limits (Pointwise convergence of a sequence of real functions, and the Baire class one functions as the pointwise limits of sequences of continuous functions).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Dirichlet function restricted to [0,1][0,1], written DD, and Q\mathbb{Q} for the canonical copy of the rationals inside R\mathbb{R} (The rationals embed densely in the reals).

[A1]

D(x)=1D(x) = 1 for xQ[0,1]x \in \mathbb{Q} \cap [0,1] and D(x)=0D(x) = 0 for x[0,1]Qx \in [0,1] \setminus \mathbb{Q} (The Dirichlet function 1Q1_{\mathbb{Q}}, and Thomae's function tt with t(x)=1/qt(x) = 1/q at a rational x=p/qx = p/q in lowest terms with q1q \ge 1 and t(x)=0t(x) = 0 at every irrational xx).

[L1]

Q[0,1]\mathbb{Q} \cap [0,1] is nonempty and at most countable, so it is the image of a surjection s:NQ[0,1]s : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{Q} \cap [0,1] (Q\mathbb{Q} is countably infinite, Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable, A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of N\mathbb{N}, The rationals embed densely in the reals).

[L5]

A nonempty finite set of reals presented as {a0,,am}\{a_{0}, \dots, a_{m}\} has a minimum, which is one of its members (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set).

[L7]

uwuv+vw|u - w| \le |u - v| + |v - w| and u0|u| \ge 0 (Basic properties of the absolute value); a sequence of reals converges to LL when it is eventually within every positive ε\varepsilon of LL (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals, Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences).

Verification

technique · contradiction
1.1

Fix a surjection s:NQ[0,1]s : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{Q} \cap [0,1] and, for mNm \in \mathbb{N}, let gm:[0,1]Rg_{m} : [0,1] \to \mathbb{R} be the indicator of {s(0),,s(m)}\{s(0), \dots, s(m)\}: gm(x)=1g_{m}(x) = 1 if x=s(j)x = s(j) for some jmj \le m, and gm(x)=0g_{m}(x) = 0 otherwise.

L1construct
1.2

Suppose, for contradiction, that DD is of Baire class one on [0,1][0,1].

assume-contra
1.3

But DD is continuous at no point of [0,1][0,1]. Let c[0,1]c \in [0,1] and let δ>0\delta > 0 be real; put u:=max{0, cδ/2}u := \max\{0,\ c - \delta/2\} and v:=min{1, c+δ/2}v := \min\{1,\ c + \delta/2\}, so that u<vu < v and [u,v][0,1]Nδ(c)[u,v] \subseteq [0,1] \cap N_{\delta}(c), the strict inequality holding because c[0,1]c \in [0,1], 0<10 < 1 and δ>0\delta > 0. The nondegenerate interval (u,v)(u,v) contains a rational y1y_{1} and an irrational y2y_{2}, with D(y1)D(y2)=1D(y_{1}) - D(y_{2}) = 1, so one of D(y1)D(c)|D(y_{1}) - D(c)| and D(y2)D(c)|D(y_{2}) - D(c)| equals 11; hence no δ\delta witnesses continuity at cc for ε=1\varepsilon = 1. This is the argument of the Dirichlet claim, restricted to the domain [0,1][0,1].

A1L2L7L8
2.1

For mNm \in \mathbb{N} define ρm:[0,1]R\rho_{m} : [0,1] \to \mathbb{R} by ρm(x):=min{xs(j):jm}\rho_{m}(x) := \min\{\, |x - s(j)| : j \le m \,\}, the minimum of a nonempty finite set of reals. Then ρm(x)0\rho_{m}(x) \ge 0, and ρm(x)=0\rho_{m}(x) = 0 exactly when x=s(j)x = s(j) for some jmj \le m, the minimum being attained.

step 1.1L5L7
2.2

Then the set of points of [0,1][0,1] at which DD is continuous is dense in [0,1][0,1], since 0<10 < 1; in particular it is nonempty.

step 1.2L3
3.1

ρm\rho_{m} is 11-Lipschitz, hence continuous: choosing j0mj_{0} \le m with ρm(x)=xs(j0)\rho_{m}(x) = |x - s(j_{0})| gives ρm(y)ys(j0)yx+ρm(x)\rho_{m}(y) \le |y - s(j_{0})| \le |y - x| + \rho_{m}(x), and exchanging xx and yy gives ρm(x)ρm(y)xy|\rho_{m}(x) - \rho_{m}(y)| \le |x - y|; so δ:=ε\delta := \varepsilon witnesses continuity at every point.

step 2.1L4L5L7
4.1

For m,nNm, n \in \mathbb{N} define hm,n:[0,1]Rh_{m,n} : [0,1] \to \mathbb{R} by hm,n(x):=max{0, 1ι(n)ρm(x)}h_{m,n}(x) := \max\{\, 0,\ 1 - \iota(n)\,\rho_{m}(x) \,\}; the index runs over the whole of N\mathbb{N}, the term at n=0n = 0 being the constant 11 since ι(0)=0\iota(0) = 0, so that nhm,nn \mapsto h_{m,n} is a sequence in the sense of Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences. Each hm,nh_{m,n} is continuous on [0,1][0,1], being the pointwise maximum of the constant 00 and the continuous function x1ι(n)ρm(x)x \mapsto 1 - \iota(n)\rho_{m}(x).

step 3.1L4L6
5.1

For each fixed mm the sequence nhm,nn \mapsto h_{m,n} converges pointwise on [0,1][0,1] to gmg_{m}. If ρm(x)=0\rho_{m}(x) = 0 then hm,n(x)=max{0,1}=1=gm(x)h_{m,n}(x) = \max\{0,1\} = 1 = g_{m}(x) for every nn. If ρm(x)>0\rho_{m}(x) > 0 then, taking a natural n01n_{0} \ge 1 with ι(n0)>1/ρm(x)\iota(n_{0}) > 1/\rho_{m}(x), every nn0n \ge n_{0} has ι(n)ρm(x)ι(n0)ρm(x)>1\iota(n)\rho_{m}(x) \ge \iota(n_{0})\rho_{m}(x) > 1, so hm,n(x)=0=gm(x)h_{m,n}(x) = 0 = g_{m}(x).

step 2.1step 4.1L6L7
6.1

Hence each gmg_{m} is of Baire class one on [0,1][0,1], being the pointwise limit of a sequence of continuous functions.

step 4.1step 5.1
7.1

The sequence (gm)mN(g_{m})_{m \in \mathbb{N}} converges pointwise on [0,1][0,1] to DD. If xQ[0,1]x \in \mathbb{Q} \cap [0,1] then x=s(k)x = s(k) for some kk, since ss is onto, and gm(x)=1=D(x)g_{m}(x) = 1 = D(x) for every mkm \ge k. If x[0,1]x \in [0,1] is irrational then xs(j)x \ne s(j) for every jj, so gm(x)=0=D(x)g_{m}(x) = 0 = D(x) for every mm. Claim 1 is proved.

step 1.1step 6.1A1L1L7
8.1

Steps 2.2 and 1.3 contradict one another, so the assumption of step 1.2 is false and DD is not of Baire class one on [0,1][0,1]: claim 2 holds, and with step 7.1 the example is complete.

step 7.1step 1.2step 2.2step 1.3discharge-contradiction

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 158 results over 37 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources