How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Worked cases of Dehn surgery on the unknot
Example
Assume . Let be the standard oriented unknot in the oriented -sphere, with chosen exterior and peripheral basis . In the orientation convention , for coprime integers and , the filling is the oriented lens space and has . The filling is , the filling is , and for every integer the filling is the boundary of the integer-framed trace .
Example references
Countable-choice hypothesis for the chosen peripheral data
Library orientation convention for
First-homology formula for knot fillings
Boundary of the integer-framed trace
Saveliev, Lecture 1 §1.5 and Lecture 2 §§2.3–2.4, lens spaces and surgery traces
Ozsváth–Stipsicz–Szabó, §1.2.3 and Exercise 1.2.14, surgery on the unknot
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unknot exterior , its meridian–preferred-longitude basis , and the filling convention .
First homology of knot fillings: for , and .
Boundary of the integer-framed knot surgery trace: the outgoing boundary of the integer-framed trace is the filling .
Lens spaces in the filling orientation convention: is the oriented union of the unknot exterior and a solid torus whose meridian maps to , for and .
Oriented slopes and knot Dehn filling: gluing maps with the same meridian slope give the same oriented filling type.
Verification
A standard unknot is the coordinate circle in given by . Its tubular neighborhood and its exterior are both solid tori; on the exterior, bounds a meridional disk and is a longitude. Therefore each filling is a union of two solid tori, and for it is by [F3].
When , primitivity forces , so the attaching meridian matches the meridian of the exterior solid torus. By the gluing-map independence in the slope definition [F4], use the product gluing; then and glue along as .
For , the attaching slope is one meridian plus one longitude of the exterior solid torus. A Dehn twist along its meridian disk extends over that torus and changes this slope to its longitude. By [F4] the gluing may then be chosen to be the standard decomposition , so the filled orientation is that of .
For all coprime , [F1] gives the stated group; the cases and agree with steps 2.1 and 2.2.
For every integer , [F2] identifies the filling with the outgoing boundary of . This adds no rational-framing claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nikolai Saveliev, Lectures on the Topology of 3-Manifolds, 2nd revised edition, Lecture 1 §1.5, Lecture 2 §§2.3–2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter S. Ozsváth, András I. Stipsicz, and Zoltán Szabó, Heegaard Floer homology, version 2025-12-15, §1.2.3 and Exercise 1.2.14 (standard reference, not scraped)