Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First homology of knot fillings

Statement

Assume ACω. Let K be a smooth oriented knot in the oriented 3-sphere, choose a closed tubular neighborhood N(K), and set EK=S3∖int⁡N(K) and TK=∂EK=∂N(K); assume EK is connected. Let μ be the oriented boundary of a normal disk whose orientation, preceded by the oriented tangent to K, agrees with the orientation of S3. Let λ be a simple closed curve on TK whose degree under the normal-tube projection TK→K is +1 and whose image in H1(EK;Z) is zero; such a curve is a preferred longitude. Assume ([μ],[λ]) is an ordered basis of H1(TK;Z). For coprime integers p,q not both zero, let EK(p/q) be the filling whose attached solid-torus meridian maps to p[μ]+q[λ]. Then H1(EK(p/q);Z)≅{Z/∣p∣Z,p≠0,Z,p=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth oriented knot K⊂S3, its exterior EK, tubular neighborhood N(K), boundary torus TK, meridian μ, preferred longitude λ, and coprime integers p,q not both zero.

[F1]

Mayer–Vietoris sequence in singular homology: for an open cover X=U∪V, the singular-homology Mayer–Vietoris sequence is exact, with the map from the overlap given by c↦(i∗c,−j∗c) for the two inclusions i:U∩V↪U and j:U∩V↪V, and the next map by (u,v)↦i∗u+j∗v.

[F2]

Homology of spheres: for n≥1, the reduced singular homology of Sn is Z in degree n and zero in all other degrees; in particular H1(S3;Z)=H2(S3;Z)=0 and H1(S1;Z)=Z.

[F3]

Mayer–Vietoris computation of first homology of the torus: H1(T2;Z)≅Z⊕Z, generated by the two factor circles.

[F4]

Singular homology is invariant under deformation retracts: a deformation-retract inclusion induces an isomorphism on singular homology.

[F5]

Oriented slopes and knot Dehn filling: the filling glues a solid torus to EK with its meridian identified with the class p[μ]+q[λ].

[A1]

ACω is the stated axiom The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). The chosen positive meridian bounds its normal disk in N(K), and the preferred-longitude definition supplies both degree +1 over the core and [λ]=0 in H1(EK;Z); the pair being a boundary homology basis is an explicit hypothesis Meridian and preferred longitude. The proof derives that [μ] generates H1(EK;Z) in step 2.1 by Mayer–Vietoris and does not invoke the separate full-AC exterior-homology theorem.

[F6]

For any space, H0(−;Z) is free on its path components; in particular a path-connected space has H0≅Z, and an inclusion between path-connected spaces sends the point generator to the point generator Zero-th singular homology is free on path components.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F4construct

Choose a bicollar of TK in S3 and thicken EK and N(K) slightly to an open cover. The two sets deformation-retract to EK and N(K), and their intersection deformation-retracts to TK. By [F1] and [F2], the segment H2(S3;Z)→H1(TK;Z)→H1(EK;Z)⊕H1(N(K);Z)→H1(S3;Z) has zero groups at both ends, so the middle map is an isomorphism.

1.2givenA1F1F2F3F4F5F6construct

Let M=EK(p/q) and choose a bicollar of the gluing torus. Thickening the exterior and attached solid torus across this collar gives an open cover of M whose two sets retract to the pieces and whose intersection retracts to TK. Write α=pμ+qλ, and choose β=rμ+sλ with ps−qr=1, so α,β form a basis of H1(TK;Z). In the Mayer–Vietoris map, α maps to (p[μ],0) because it bounds the attached solid-torus meridian disk, and β maps to (r[μ],±v) where v generates the first homology of the attached solid torus; the coefficient is ±1 because β intersects α once. The pieces and their overlap are path-connected: the exterior is a connected manifold and hence path-connected, and the solid torus and boundary torus are path-connected. By [F6], the following H0 map sends 1 to (1,−1) and is injective. Exactness therefore identifies H1(M;Z) with the cokernel of the H1 map.

2.1step 1.1A1F2F3F4algebra

By [F3], H1(TK;Z)≅Z2, and by [F4] and [F2] the solid torus N(K)≃S1 has H1(N(K);Z)≅Z. Since H1(EK;Z)⊕Z≅Z2, the direct summand H1(EK;Z) is free of rank one. Under the isomorphism in step 1.1, μ maps to ([μ],0) because it bounds a disk in N(K). The longitude maps to (0,±1): [A1] gives its zero exterior image, and degree +1 on the core gives a generator of H1(N(K);Z) under the deformation-retraction identification. Since the map is an isomorphism, [μ] generates H1(EK;Z).

3.1step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

Thus H1(M;Z) has generators [μ],v and relations p[μ]=0 and r[μ]±v=0. Eliminating v leaves Z⟨[μ]⟩/⟨p[μ]⟩. If p≠0, this is Z/∣p∣Z; if p=0, coprimality gives q=±1 and the group is Z.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources