Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A continuous P1 pressure gives a nonconservative primal flux

Statement

Assume Countable Choice.

On the unit square split along the diagonal from (0,0) to (1,1), the continuous piecewise-affine pressure with nodal values 0,0,1,0 at (0,0),(1,0),(1,1),(0,1) has negative gradient q=(0,−1) below the diagonal and q=(−1,0) above it. Each cellwise divergence is zero, but the normal flux jumps by magnitude 2 across the diagonal; hence this piecewise field is not in H(div⁡;D) and does not have a locally conservative global flux.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The unit square mesh and the nodal data stated above; all vector fields and distributional pairings are real.

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the real H(div) definition. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

H(div) consists of L2 vector fields whose distributional divergence is an L2 function. (The real H(div) space)

[F2]

Cauchy–Schwarz bounds the pairing of any hypothetical L2 divergence with a test function. (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2)

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

Let K1={0<y<x<1} and K2={0<x<y<1}. The affine formulas p1(x,y)=y and p2(x,y)=x agree on x=y and attain the four stated vertex values, so they define a continuous piecewise-P1 function. Their negative gradients are q1=(0,−1) and q2=(−1,0), each with classical divergence zero. With fixed diagonal normal n=(1,−1)/2, q1⋅n=1/2 and q2⋅n=−1/2, so the jump magnitude is 2.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1algebracontradiction∎

For ϕ∈Cc∞(D), integration by parts on the two triangles shows that the distributional divergence of the piecewise field is the nonzero line measure on the diagonal with density q1⋅n−q2⋅n=2 in this orientation (the distributional pairing is the negative of the summed outward boundary flux). To see it cannot be an L2 function, choose a nonnegative smooth ψ supported in the open diagonal with positive line integral and a smooth transverse cutoff η with η(0)=1; set ϕε(y,t)=ψ(y)η(t/ε) in tubular coordinates, extended by zero. The surface pairing is the fixed nonzero number 2∫ψ, whereas ∥ϕε∥L2(D)=O(ε1/2). If the distribution were represented by g∈L2(D), [F2] would give ∣∫gϕε∣≤∥g∥2∥ϕε∥2→0, a contradiction. By [F1] the field is not in H(div).

Mesh diagram

K1K2q1=(0;¡1)q2=(¡1;0)n=(1;¡1)=p2

The square coordinates are the unit-square vertices, and the diagonal is the shared facet. The fixed normal points from K2 to K1; arrow lengths are schematic, while the proof gives the exact normal components and their jump.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources