Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 4 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 4 also cleared it.

Mixed H(div) fluxes, Darcy flow and local conservation — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples compute the facet fluxes of a constant Darcy solution on the reference triangle; show that a continuous P1 pressure can produce a discontinuous-normal, non-H(div) primal flux; substitute checkerboard coefficients into the explicit permeability-contrast constants; and solve the two-cell hybrid equations, including the mean-pressure gauge and the condensed skeleton nullspace. The mesh drawings label orientations only; each finite argument computes its coordinates, flux moments, coefficient bounds and equations directly.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A continuous P1 pressure gives a nonconservative primal flux

Statement

Assume Countable Choice.

On the unit square split along the diagonal from (0,0) to (1,1), the continuous piecewise-affine pressure with nodal values 0,0,1,0 at (0,0),(1,0),(1,1),(0,1) has negative gradient q=(0,−1) below the diagonal and q=(−1,0) above it. Each cellwise divergence is zero, but the normal flux jumps by magnitude 2 across the diagonal; hence this piecewise field is not in H(div⁡;D) and does not have a locally conservative global flux.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The unit square mesh and the nodal data stated above; all vector fields and distributional pairings are real.

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the real H(div) definition. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

H(div) consists of L2 vector fields whose distributional divergence is an L2 function. (The real H(div) space)

[F2]

Cauchy–Schwarz bounds the pairing of any hypothetical L2 divergence with a test function. (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2)

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

Let K1={0<y<x<1} and K2={0<x<y<1}. The affine formulas p1(x,y)=y and p2(x,y)=x agree on x=y and attain the four stated vertex values, so they define a continuous piecewise-P1 function. Their negative gradients are q1=(0,−1) and q2=(−1,0), each with classical divergence zero. With fixed diagonal normal n=(1,−1)/2, q1⋅n=1/2 and q2⋅n=−1/2, so the jump magnitude is 2.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1algebracontradiction∎

For ϕ∈Cc∞(D), integration by parts on the two triangles shows that the distributional divergence of the piecewise field is the nonzero line measure on the diagonal with density q1⋅n−q2⋅n=2 in this orientation (the distributional pairing is the negative of the summed outward boundary flux). To see it cannot be an L2 function, choose a nonnegative smooth ψ supported in the open diagonal with positive line integral and a smooth transverse cutoff η with η(0)=1; set ϕε(y,t)=ψ(y)η(t/ε) in tubular coordinates, extended by zero. The surface pairing is the fixed nonzero number 2∫ψ, whereas ∥ϕε∥L2(D)=O(ε1/2). If the distribution were represented by g∈L2(D), [F2] would give ∣∫gϕε∣≤∥g∥2∥ϕε∥2→0, a contradiction. By [F1] the field is not in H(div).

Mesh diagram

K1K2q1=(0;¡1)q2=(¡1;0)n=(1;¡1)=p2

The square coordinates are the unit-square vertices, and the diagonal is the shared facet. The fixed normal points from K2 to K1; arrow lengths are schematic, while the proof gives the exact normal components and their jump.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A constant Darcy flux on the reference triangle

Statement

Assume Countable Choice.

On K={(x,y):x>0,y>0,x+y<1} with unit permeability, q=(1,0) and p=−x satisfy q+∇p=0 and div⁡q=0. Their outward integrated facet fluxes on x=0, y=0, and x+y=1 are respectively −1,0,+1, so exact local mass balance holds.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The reference triangle, unit permeability, the constant flux q=(1,0), and affine pressure p=−x.

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the mesh and RT0 unisolvence interfaces. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

RT0 facet fluxes determine the local RT0 field, and its divergence is constant. (Affine simplicial meshes and RT/BDM spaces, RT0 facet-flux unisolvence and global H(div) conformity)

[F2]

The Gauss–Green formula equates the divergence integral with the sum of outward facet fluxes. (Gauss–Green formula on an affine simplex)

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

The gradient is ∇p=(−1,0), so q+∇p=0 pointwise. The three outward unit normals are (−1,0) on x=0, (0,−1) on y=0, and (1,1)/2 on the hypotenuse. Their facet lengths are 1,1,2, respectively. Therefore the integrated fluxes are −1, 0, and (1/2)2=1.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

Their sum is zero, equal to ∫Kdiv⁡q=0 by [F2]. Since q is in RT0 and the fluxes are its facet degrees of freedom by [F1], the data also uniquely determine this constant flux among RT0 fields.

Mesh diagram

(0;0)(1;0)(0;1)y=0x=0x+y=1q¢n=¡1q¢n=0q¢n>0

The triangle is the set x>0,y>0,x+y<1. The blue arrows indicate the outward-normal directions; their magnitudes are schematic. The proof computes the exact integrated fluxes, so the drawing supplies orientation only.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Checkerboard permeability and the explicit contrast factor

Statement

Assume Countable Choice.

On a 2×2 checkerboard of equal squares, split each square into two affine triangles and set scalar permeability K=1 on one color and K=106 on the other. Then κmin⁡=1, κmax⁡=106, the weighted energy assigns coefficients 1 and 10−6 to the two regions, and the RT0/P0 graph-norm error constants include α∗−1=106 and Ma/α∗=106.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The checkerboard mesh and piecewise-constant scalar permeability just defined.

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited through the mixed error theorem. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The weighted flux energy is ∥v∥K−12=∫DK−1∣v∣2 and the coefficient bounds determine Ma=κmin⁡−1 and α∗=κmax⁡−1. (No-flow mixed Darcy problem and coefficient norms, RT0/P0 Darcy stability and flux/pressure error bound)

[F2]

The stable RT0/P0 inf-sup factor depends on the mesh/domain lift constant CR, while the explicit error formula also contains α∗−1 and Ma. (RT0/P0 Darcy stability and flux/pressure error bound)

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

The two positive scalar values are 1 and 106, so their minimum and maximum are exactly κmin⁡=1 and κmax⁡=106. Their reciprocals in K−1 are 1 and 10−6; substituting into the energy definition gives ∥v∥K−12=∫D1∣v∣2+10−6∫D106∣v∣2.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

The error theorem constants are Ma=1, α∗=10−6, so α∗−1=106 and Ma/α∗=106. The inf-sup lower bound β^=(1+CR2)−1/2 has no permeability parameter because the divergence lift is geometric; this example therefore records an explicit contrast dependence and supplies no contrast-independent error claim.

Checkerboard mesh

K=1K=106K=106K=1

The four unit squares are coefficient regions, each split into two triangles along the drawn diagonal. Blue squares have permeability 1, orange squares have permeability 106; each label applies to both triangles in that square. The figure shows the alternating arrangement only; the proof substitutes the exact values into the constants.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Two-triangle hybrid RT0 local elimination

Statement

Assume Countable Choice.

Split the unit square by its diagonal into K1={0<y<x<1} and K2={0<x<y<1}. For unit permeability and f=1 on K1, f=−1 on K2, the hybrid solution has u1=12θ1,u2=−12θ2,p1=112,p2=−112,λ=0, where θ1(x,y)=(x−1,y) and θ2(x,y)=(x,y−1). The local elimination equations reduce to tK/6−pK+λ=0, t1=1/2, t2=−1/2, and t1+t2=0; changing λ shifts both pressures by the same constant and is precisely the gauge.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two-triangle mesh, unit permeability, and source values +1,−1 on equal-area cells.

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the hybrid equivalence and local flux suppliers. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The local hybrid equations use the cell energy, pressure-divergence term, facet multiplier, cell balance and matching-flux equations. (Hybridized no-flow RT0/P0 Darcy system)

[F2]

Cell balances and the constant pressure gauge have the meanings stated in the hybridization theorem. (Hybridization, static condensation, and pressure gauge)

[F3]

Gauss–Green gives the integral of divergence as total outward facet flux on each triangle. (Gauss–Green formula on an affine simplex)

[F4]

RT0 facet fluxes are unisolvent; imposing zero flux on two facets leaves a one-dimensional local flux space. (RT0 facet-flux unisolvence and global H(div) conformity)

Proof

1.1givenF3F4algebra

Each cell has area 1/2. The field θ1=(x−1,y) has zero normal component on x=1 and y=0, and unit integrated outward flux on the diagonal from K1; θ2=(x,y−1) has zero normal component on x=0 and y=1, and unit integrated outward flux on the diagonal from K2. Their divergences are both 2, so ∫Kidiv⁡θi=1 by [F3]. The two zero-boundary conditions and the single free facet degree of freedom make each θi a basis of its local space by [F4]. Direct integration gives ∫K1∣θ1∣2=∫01∫0x((x−1)2+y2) dy dx=16, and reflection symmetry gives ∫K2∣θ2∣2=1/6.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Write ui=tiθi. The cell balances in [F1] give t1=∫K1f=1/2 and t2=∫K2f=−1/2. For a local test vi=sθi, its integrated divergence is s and its interior outward flux is s. The first hybrid equation is therefore tis/6−pis+λs=0 for every real s, equivalently ti/6−pi+λ=0. The jump equation is t1+t2=0, which the balance values satisfy.

3.1A1F2step 2.1algebra∎

Solving the local equations gives p1=1/12+λ and p2=−1/12+λ. Since the cells have equal area, their global mean is λ; choose the mean-zero gauge λ=0 to obtain the stated pressures. After local elimination the single skeleton equation is t1+t2=0, independent of λ, so its one-dimensional nullspace consists exactly of common constant shifts. This is the constant gauge described in [F2].

Mesh diagram

K1,f=1K2,f=¡1¸u1u2

The shared diagonal is the only interior facet. Flux arrows are schematic; the proof computes their exact integrated outward values as 1/2 and −1/2.

Sources