How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hybridization, static condensation, and pressure gauge
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and the source-only Darcy system and hybrid equations of Hybridized no-flow RT0/P0 Darcy system on a facet-connected mesh. The hybrid solutions modulo the common pressure shift are in one-to-one correspondence with the conforming RT0/P0 Darcy solution. If the mesh has at least two cells, every local flux-pressure saddle block is invertible; eliminating these local variables gives a linear system on the interior-facet multipliers whose nullspace is exactly the one-dimensional constant gauge. For one cell, the conforming flux and mean-zero pressure spaces are zero and the hybrid pressure is entirely gauge.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A source , a facet-connected conforming mesh, fixed positive permeability bounds, and the hybrid spaces and equations in Hybridized no-flow RT0/P0 Darcy system.
Countable Choice is inherited through the discrete mixed solvability and normal-trace interfaces. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
The hybrid method has broken RT0 cell fluxes with zero exterior normal flux, cell pressures, facet multipliers, local equations, cell balances, and flux-jump constraints; shifting all pressures and multipliers by the same constant is a gauge. (Hybridized no-flow RT0/P0 Darcy system)
Piecewise RT0 fields with matching oriented facet fluxes and zero boundary flux lie in ; each facet flux is a unisolvent local degree of freedom. (RT0 facet-flux unisolvence and global H(div) conformity)
The conforming RT0/P0 source problem has a unique solution for the mean-zero pressure. (RT0/P0 Darcy stability and flux/pressure error bound)
Every conforming solution satisfies the cell balances . (Exact RT0/P0 element mass balance and normal continuity)
On each cell, a local RT0 basis function has unit outward flux on one selected facet and zero flux on all other facets. (RT0 facet-flux unisolvence and global H(div) conformity)
The local quadratic form is positive definite with . (No-flow mixed Darcy problem and coefficient norms)
Every no-flow H(div) field has zero total divergence integral. (Zero mean of the divergence under zero normal trace)
Proof
Start with a hybrid solution. Its jump constraints and zero boundary flux, together with [F2], make a member of . Summing the cell balances against any cellwise constant mean-zero gives the discrete second mixed equation.
Conversely let be the unique conforming solution. Its cell balances hold by [F4]. Let be the broken flux space and define the jump map by . Its kernel consists of fields with matching interior fluxes, hence lies in by [F2]. Define . The conforming first equation gives on .
Suppose there are at least two cells. Every cell is incident to an interior facet because the dual graph is connected and has more than one vertex. The local space therefore contains a basis flux with nonzero total outward flux, so , , is onto. The homogeneous local saddle block has equations for all and . Taking gives , so [F6] gives ; then surjectivity of forces . The square finite-dimensional block is injective and hence invertible.
Let and set . Then . Sum the local first equations against a conforming test . The facet-multiplier terms cancel by normal continuity; the constant pressure term contributes by [F7]. The remaining equation is . Thus is the conforming mixed solution, which is unique by [F3].
The map is onto: for each interior facet , use [F5] on one adjacent cell with zero flux on its other facets and zero field on all other cells; its image is the coordinate vector for . Since vanishes on , the formula is well-defined and linear on . Write and choose . Then for all broken . Taking tests supported in one cell yields each local hybrid equation; balances were already shown, so is hybrid. This proves the correspondence before quotienting the pressure gauge.
Invert the local blocks to express each as an affine function of the multiplier vector , with source-dependent right sides. Substitution into gives a linear system solely on the finitely many interior-facet multipliers; this is static condensation. Existence and correspondence follow from steps 1.1–2.2. For its homogeneous nullspace, any multiplier vector yields a homogeneous hybrid solution, hence by step 2.1 a conforming solution with zero source. Uniqueness [F3] forces and for one global constant. The local equations then read for all , since Gauss–Green and the zero physical-boundary flux give . Using the independent facet basis [F5] gives on every interior facet. Conversely a common constant vector is a null vector by the gauge identity in [F1]. Thus the kernel is exactly the constant gauge.
For one cell there are no interior multipliers. All its facets are physical boundary facets, so zero boundary flux and local unisolvence [F2] force ; also . The hybrid cell pressure is arbitrary, but every two such values differ by the common gauge, so the quotient contains one solution, corresponding to the zero conforming pair.
Depends on
- Hybridized no-flow RT0/P0 Darcy system
- No-flow mixed Darcy problem and coefficient norms
- RT0/P0 Darcy stability and flux/pressure error bound
- Exact RT0/P0 element mass balance and normal continuity
- Affine simplicial meshes and RT/BDM spaces
- RT0 facet-flux unisolvence and global H(div) conformity
- Zero mean of the divergence under zero normal trace
- Gauss–Green formula on an affine simplex
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Daniele Boffi, Franco Brezzi and Michel Fortin, Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications (standard reference, not scraped)
- Francisco-Javier Sayas, A gentle introduction to the Finite Element Method (2015) (standard reference, not scraped)