Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-triangle hybrid RT0 local elimination

Statement

Assume Countable Choice.

Split the unit square by its diagonal into K1={0<y<x<1} and K2={0<x<y<1}. For unit permeability and f=1 on K1, f=−1 on K2, the hybrid solution has u1=12θ1,u2=−12θ2,p1=112,p2=−112,λ=0, where θ1(x,y)=(x−1,y) and θ2(x,y)=(x,y−1). The local elimination equations reduce to tK/6−pK+λ=0, t1=1/2, t2=−1/2, and t1+t2=0; changing λ shifts both pressures by the same constant and is precisely the gauge.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two-triangle mesh, unit permeability, and source values +1,−1 on equal-area cells.

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the hybrid equivalence and local flux suppliers. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The local hybrid equations use the cell energy, pressure-divergence term, facet multiplier, cell balance and matching-flux equations. (Hybridized no-flow RT0/P0 Darcy system)

[F2]

Cell balances and the constant pressure gauge have the meanings stated in the hybridization theorem. (Hybridization, static condensation, and pressure gauge)

[F3]

Gauss–Green gives the integral of divergence as total outward facet flux on each triangle. (Gauss–Green formula on an affine simplex)

[F4]

RT0 facet fluxes are unisolvent; imposing zero flux on two facets leaves a one-dimensional local flux space. (RT0 facet-flux unisolvence and global H(div) conformity)

Proof

1.1givenF3F4algebra

Each cell has area 1/2. The field θ1=(x−1,y) has zero normal component on x=1 and y=0, and unit integrated outward flux on the diagonal from K1; θ2=(x,y−1) has zero normal component on x=0 and y=1, and unit integrated outward flux on the diagonal from K2. Their divergences are both 2, so ∫Kidiv⁡θi=1 by [F3]. The two zero-boundary conditions and the single free facet degree of freedom make each θi a basis of its local space by [F4]. Direct integration gives ∫K1∣θ1∣2=∫01∫0x((x−1)2+y2) dy dx=16, and reflection symmetry gives ∫K2∣θ2∣2=1/6.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Write ui=tiθi. The cell balances in [F1] give t1=∫K1f=1/2 and t2=∫K2f=−1/2. For a local test vi=sθi, its integrated divergence is s and its interior outward flux is s. The first hybrid equation is therefore tis/6−pis+λs=0 for every real s, equivalently ti/6−pi+λ=0. The jump equation is t1+t2=0, which the balance values satisfy.

3.1A1F2step 2.1algebra∎

Solving the local equations gives p1=1/12+λ and p2=−1/12+λ. Since the cells have equal area, their global mean is λ; choose the mean-zero gauge λ=0 to obtain the stated pressures. After local elimination the single skeleton equation is t1+t2=0, independent of λ, so its one-dimensional nullspace consists exactly of common constant shifts. This is the constant gauge described in [F2].

Mesh diagram

K1,f=1K2,f=¡1¸u1u2

The shared diagonal is the only interior facet. Flux arrows are schematic; the proof computes their exact integrated outward values as 1/2 and −1/2.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources