How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Checkerboard permeability and the explicit contrast factor
Statement
Assume Countable Choice.
On a checkerboard of equal squares, split each square into two affine triangles and set scalar permeability on one color and on the other. Then , , the weighted energy assigns coefficients and to the two regions, and the RT0/P0 graph-norm error constants include and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The checkerboard mesh and piecewise-constant scalar permeability just defined.
Countable Choice is inherited through the mixed error theorem. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
The weighted flux energy is and the coefficient bounds determine and . (No-flow mixed Darcy problem and coefficient norms, RT0/P0 Darcy stability and flux/pressure error bound)
The stable RT0/P0 inf-sup factor depends on the mesh/domain lift constant , while the explicit error formula also contains and . (RT0/P0 Darcy stability and flux/pressure error bound)
Proof
The two positive scalar values are and , so their minimum and maximum are exactly and . Their reciprocals in are and ; substituting into the energy definition gives .
The error theorem constants are , , so and . The inf-sup lower bound has no permeability parameter because the divergence lift is geometric; this example therefore records an explicit contrast dependence and supplies no contrast-independent error claim.
Checkerboard mesh
The four unit squares are coefficient regions, each split into two triangles along the drawn diagonal. Blue squares have permeability , orange squares have permeability ; each label applies to both triangles in that square. The figure shows the alternating arrangement only; the proof substitutes the exact values into the constants.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Fall 2025, Part XI Chapter 49: Well-posedness for PDEs in mixed form (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniele Boffi, Franco Brezzi and Michel Fortin, Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications (standard reference, not scraped)