Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Odd powers are bijections of R: x3=−8 has the unique solution x=−2

Example

Call a natural number n odd when n=2k+1 for some natural k; every odd n satisfies n≥1. Let n be odd. Then x↦xn is a bijection of R onto R: every real number has exactly one real n-th root. Explicitly, x3=−8 has the unique solution x=−2, and x5=−32 has the unique solution x=−2.

For a negative right-hand side this is a statement about the solution of xn=a, with n an odd exponent; for n>1 it does not extend the symbol a1/n, since Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a produces that symbol only for a≥0 and Rational powers ar of a positive base does not define rational powers of negative bases (its separate zero-base clause concerns nonnegative bases only). This is the claim the A-page prose records when it says that odd roots of negatives do exist, while FALSE: every real number has a real square root shows that even ones do not.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural number n=2k+1 with k∈N, so that n≥1; all powers are as in Integer powers am.

[L1]

Roots of nonnegatives (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a): for every c≥0 and every n≥1 there is a unique c1/n≥0 with (c1/n)n=c, and c1/n>0 when c>0.

[L2]

Laws of natural exponents (Laws of integer exponents, claim 1): am+n=aman, (am)n=amn and (ab)n=anbn for all reals a,b and all naturals m,n; the recursion clauses of Integer powers am give a0=1 and aj+1=aja.

[L3]

Monotonicity of powers (Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an): a≥0 implies aj≥0 and a>0 implies aj>0 for every natural j; and 0≤a<b with j≥1 implies aj<bj. Also 1j=1 for every natural j.

[L4]

Sign rules (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication): a product of two positive reals is positive; and for c<0, a<b holds exactly when bc<ac. With c=−1 this turns x<y into −y<−x and back. The identity (−1)(−1)=1 follows from (−u)(−v)=uv at u=v=1 (Sign rules for products: (−a)b=−(ab) and (−a)(−b)=ab), followed by 1⋅1=1.

[L5]

No negative square root (FALSE: every real number has a real square root): there is no real y with y2=−1, so the hypothesis that n be odd cannot be dropped; even exponents land in the nonnegatives.

[L6]

The rational-power construction (Rational powers ar of a positive base) applies to a>0 and every rational r, and additionally sets 0r=0 for rational r>0. It assigns no noninteger rational powers to negative bases. Integer powers remain defined by Integer powers am; in particular the case n=1 gives a1=a.

Verification

technique · cases
1.1L2L3L4algebra

The odd power of a negative is negative: since n=2k+1 and (−1)2=(−1)(−1)=1 by [L4], the laws of [L2] give (−1)n=((−1)2)k⋅(−1)=1k⋅(−1)=−1 by [L3]; hence for every real u, (−u)n=((−1)u)n=(−1)nun=− un by the product law of [L2], so a negative input gives a negative output and (−u)n>0 whenever u<0.

2.1step 1.1L1algebra

Existence, in the two sign cases: if a≥0, put x:=a1/n, so that xn=a by [L1]; if a<0, put b:=−a>0, y:=b1/n≥0 by [L1], and x:=−y, so that xn=(−y)n=− yn=−b=a by step 1.1 and yn=b; in both cases x is a real n-th root of a, so every real number is an n-th power.

2.2step 1.1L3L4cases

Injectivity, in the three order cases: let x<y be reals. If 0≤x<y then xn<yn by [L3]. If x<y≤0 then 0≤−y<−x by [L4], so (−y)n<(−x)n by [L3], that is − yn<− xn by step 1.1, and multiplying by −1 through [L4] gives xn<yn. If x<0≤y then xn=− (−x)n<0 by step 1.1 and [L3] applied to the positive −x, while yn≥0 by [L3], so again xn<yn. Hence x<y always implies xn<yn, and x↦xn is injective.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2step 1.1L2L5L6cases-exhaustive∎

Combining steps 2.1 and 2.2, x↦xn is injective and surjective, hence a bijection of R onto R, and every real number has exactly one real n-th root; in particular (−2)3=− 23=−8 and (−2)5=− 25=−32 by step 1.1 and the evaluations of [L2], so x=−2 solves x3=−8 and x5=−32, and injectivity makes those solutions unique; the hypothesis that n is odd is indispensable, since for n=2 the value −1 has no real square root by [L5], and [L6] records why none of this assigns a value to (−8)1/3 as a rational power.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources