How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rational powers of rational bases computed from the definition
Example
In , with the rational powers of Rational powers of a positive base:
and , one value produced from either representative of
the rational . Every base occurring is a positive rational and every
exponent a rational with numerator an integer and denominator a natural
, so the definition applies in each case; the last display is the
instance of Rational powers do not depend on the representative that Rational powers of a positive base
records in its justified_by. The item also checks the negative-exponent and
non-coprime-representative cases, the two places where the definition is most
easily misread.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rational powers of Rational powers of a positive base, used at the displayed rational exponents.
Definition (Rational powers of a positive base): for and with and a natural , , and for rational .
Well-definedness (Rational powers do not depend on the representative): the value depends only on the rational , not on the representative.
Roots (Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with ): every has a unique with , and for ; in particular .
Integer powers and their laws (Integer powers , Laws of integer exponents): , , for naturals , and for and .
Rationals (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers): a rational is an equivalence class of pairs, and equality holds exactly when in ; since this gives .
Uniqueness of inverses (Identities and inverses in a field are unique): a nonzero element of a field has exactly one multiplicative inverse, so an element whose product with a given one is is that inverse.
Verification
The two-thirds roots: field arithmetic gives and with , so the uniqueness in [L3] gives , read at the representative , and , read at the representative .
The non-coprime representative: with gives by [L3], and as rationals by [L5] (both are the rational with ), so well-definedness [L2] gives : the same value from either representative of .
The exponent : by the definition [L1] at the representative and the value of step 1.1, by [L4] and field arithmetic.
The negative exponent : with gives by the same uniqueness argument as step 1.1, so the definition at the representative and the negative-exponent clause of [L4] give , the last equality because and inverses are unique by [L6].
All four displays are therefore verified from the definition: the first two by uniqueness of the nonnegative roots (step 1.1), the third by the definition at the representative (step 2.1), the fourth by the definition at the negative representative together with the negative-exponent clause of the integer powers (step 2.2), and the fifth by well-definedness across the two representatives of (step 1.2); every base used is positive, so no clause of [L1] is applied outside its hypotheses.
Depends on
- Rational powers $a^r$ of a positive base
- Rational powers do not depend on the representative
- Laws of rational exponents
- Existence and uniqueness of $n$-th roots: a unique $a^{1/n} \ge 0$ with $(a^{1/n})^n = a$
- Laws of integer exponents
- Integer powers $a^m$
- The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers
- Identities and inverses in a field are unique
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jiří Lebl, Basic Analysis I: Introduction to Real Analysis, Volume I, version 6.3, 15 May 2026 (author-hosted complete book) (standard reference, not scraped)