Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational powers of rational bases computed from the definition

Example

In R, with the rational powers of Rational powers ar of a positive base:

(4/9)1/2=2/3,(8/27)1/3=2/3,(4/9)3/2=8/27,(27/8)−2/3=4/9,

and 82/6=81/3=2, one value produced from either representative of the rational 1/3=2/6. Every base occurring is a positive rational and every exponent a rational with numerator an integer and denominator a natural ≥1, so the definition applies in each case; the last display is the instance of Rational powers do not depend on the representative that Rational powers ar of a positive base records in its justified_by. The item also checks the negative-exponent and non-coprime-representative cases, the two places where the definition is most easily misread.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rational powers of Rational powers ar of a positive base, used at the displayed rational exponents.

[L1]

Definition (Rational powers ar of a positive base): for a>0 and r=m/n with m∈Z and n a natural ≥1, ar=(a1/n)m, and 0r=0 for rational r>0.

[L2]

Well-definedness (Rational powers do not depend on the representative): the value (a1/n)m depends only on the rational m/n, not on the representative.

[L3]

Roots (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a): every c≥0 has a unique c1/n≥0 with (c1/n)n=c, and c1/n>0 for c>0; in particular c1/1=c.

[L4]

Integer powers and their laws (Integer powers am, Laws of integer exponents): x0=1, xj+1=xjx, (uv)n=unvn for naturals n, and x−j=(xj)−1 for j≥1 and x≠0.

[L5]

Rationals (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers): a rational is an equivalence class of pairs, and equality m/n=p/q holds exactly when mq=pn in Z; since 2⋅3=1⋅6 this gives 2/6=1/3.

[L6]

Uniqueness of inverses (Identities and inverses in a field are unique): a nonzero element of a field has exactly one multiplicative inverse, so an element whose product with a given one is 1 is that inverse.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1L3algebra

The two-thirds roots: field arithmetic gives (2/3)2=4/9 and (2/3)3=8/27 with 2/3≥0, so the uniqueness in [L3] gives (4/9)1/2=2/3, read at the representative 1/2, and (8/27)1/3=2/3, read at the representative 1/3.

1.2L2L3L5algebra

The non-coprime representative: 23=8 with 2≥0 gives 81/3=2 by [L3], and 2/6=1/3 as rationals by [L5] (both are the rational with 2⋅3=1⋅6), so well-definedness [L2] gives 82/6=81/3=2: the same value from either representative of 1/3.

2.1step 1.1L1L4algebra

The exponent 3/2: by the definition [L1] at the representative 3/2 and the value of step 1.1, (4/9)3/2=((4/9)1/2)3=(2/3)3=8/27 by [L4] and field arithmetic.

2.2step 1.1L1L3L4L6algebra

The negative exponent −2/3: (3/2)3=27/8 with 3/2≥0 gives (27/8)1/3=3/2 by the same uniqueness argument as step 1.1, so the definition at the representative −2/3 and the negative-exponent clause of [L4] give (27/8)−2/3=((27/8)1/3)−2=(3/2)−2=((3/2)2)−1=(9/4)−1=4/9, the last equality because (9/4)(4/9)=1 and inverses are unique by [L6].

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2L1L2∎

All four displays are therefore verified from the definition: the first two by uniqueness of the nonnegative roots (step 1.1), the third by the definition at the representative 3/2 (step 2.1), the fourth by the definition at the negative representative −2/3 together with the negative-exponent clause of the integer powers (step 2.2), and the fifth by well-definedness across the two representatives of 1/3 (step 1.2); every base used is positive, so no clause of [L1] is applied outside its hypotheses.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources