Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The two-term AM-GM inequality, its equality case, and x+x−1≥2

Example

(a) For all a,b≥0,

a+b2  ≥  ab,equivalentlyab≤(a+b2)2,

with equality in either form exactly when a=b.

(b) Consequently, for every x>0, x+x−1≥2, with equality exactly when x=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Reals a,b≥0 for part (a), a real x>0 for part (b), and the display abbreviations A:=(a+b)/2, G:=(ab)1/2.

[L1]

Arithmetic-geometric mean (The arithmetic mean, geometric mean inequality): for n=2 and entries a,b≥0, ∏k<2ak≤A2, equivalently G≤A, with equality in either form exactly when a=b.

[L2]

Roots and square roots (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a, Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}, Rational powers ar of a positive base): for c≥0, c1/2=c is the unique s≥0 with s2=c, and it is positive when c>0; in particular 11/2=1.

[L3]

Rational power and integer power algebra (Laws of rational exponents, Integer powers am): x⋅x−1=1 for x≠0, where x−1=(x1)−1 is the inverse; and 11/2=1. For x>0, the inverse x−1 is positive by claim 1 of Laws of rational exponents at the exponent −1.

[L4]

Monotonicity of squaring (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives): for u,v≥0, u≤v holds exactly when u2≤v2; consequently a nonnegative s with s2=c is the unique square root of c.

[L5]

Monotonicity of powers (Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an): y↦yj is strictly increasing on the nonnegatives for j≥1 and 1j=1; so 0≤y<1 gives y2<1 and y>1 gives y2>1.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1L2L4algebra

Part (a). Since a,b≥0 we have A=(a+b)/2≥0 and G=(ab)1/2≥0 with G2=ab by [L2]; the theorem [L1] gives G2=ab≤A2, and the monotonicity of squaring on the nonnegatives [L4] turns G2≤A2 into the equivalent G≤A, that is ab≤(a+b)/2; conversely G≤A gives ab=G2≤A2, so the two displayed forms are equivalent for all a,b≥0; and the equality clause of [L1] gives ab=A2 exactly when a=b, equivalently G=A exactly when a=b by [L4], which is the equality assertion in both forms.

2.1step 1.1L2L3L5algebra

Part (b). Let x>0 and apply part (a), as established in step 1.1, to the nonnegative pair x and x−1: the product is x⋅x−1=1 by [L3], so the geometric mean is 11/2=1 by [L2] and [L3], and the arithmetic mean is (x+x−1)/2; hence 1≤(x+x−1)/2, that is x+x−1≥2; equality holds exactly when x=x−1 by the equality clause of step 1.1, and x=x−1 holds exactly when x2=1, since multiplying x=x−1 by x gives x2=1, while x2=1 gives x=x⋅1=x (x⋅x−1)=(x⋅x) x−1=1⋅x−1=x−1; finally, for x>0 the equation x2=1 holds exactly at x=1, because 0<x<1 gives x2<1 and x>1 gives x2>1 by [L5] while x=1 gives x2=1.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1∎

The two claims are therefore proved: part (a) with its equality case for all nonnegative a,b (step 1.1), and part (b) for every x>0 with equality exactly at x=1 (step 2.1).

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources