How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The one-mode Schrödinger formulas and their phase
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and let . On define and . Then . The phase-corrected operators satisfy and are exactly the one-mode Schrödinger operators, acting by
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , Lebesgue , and the operators in the Statement.
Under Countable Choice, with its integral pairing is a complex Hilbert space; translation preserves Lebesgue measure, so is a well-defined isometry with inverse ( with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space, Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation).
For every real , , so multiplication by is unitary on complex and the scalar phase has modulus one (, , and , Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions).
The Weyl phase convention is with (Regular Weyl systems and irreducibility).
Countable Choice is the hypothesis used to make a Hilbert space (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Given: The data in the Statement.
By [F1] and [F2], and are unitary. Direct evaluation gives and , so .
The formula in the Statement yields , proving the asserted Schrödinger formula directly.
The commutation identity from step 1.1 gives . Therefore . The exponent coefficient satisfies , so this is , as required by [F3].
Boundary cases
- The displayed formula requires no regularity or irreducibility result; its algebraic product identity also holds at .
- The two basic operator families commute up to the displayed scalar; omitting the factor changes the Weyl convention.
Depends on
- Regular Weyl systems and irreducibility
- Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions
- $L^2$ with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation
- $\exp(x+iy)=e^x(\cos y+i\sin y)$, $|\exp(x+iy)|=e^x$, and $e^{i\pi}+1=0$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Roland Speicher, Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Mechanics, Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)