Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The one-mode Schrödinger formulas and their phase

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and let λ≠0. On L2(R) define Uqf(x)=f(x−q) and Vpf(x)=eiλpxf(x). Then UqVp=e−iλqpVpUq. The phase-corrected operators Wλ(q,p):=eiλqp/2UqVp satisfy Wλ(q,p)Wλ(q′,p′)=e−iλ(qp′−pq′)/2Wλ(q+q′,p+p′) and are exactly the one-mode Schrödinger operators, acting by (Wλ(q,p)f)(x)=eiλp(x−q/2)f(x−q).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: λ≠0, Lebesgue L2(R), and the operators in the Statement.

[F1]

Under Countable Choice, L2(R) with its integral pairing is a complex Hilbert space; translation preserves Lebesgue measure, so Uq is a well-defined isometry with inverse U−q (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space, Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation).

[F2]

For every real s, ∣eis∣=1, so multiplication by eiλpx is unitary on complex L2 and the scalar phase eiλqp/2 has modulus one (exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0, Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions).

[F3]

The Weyl phase convention is e−iλω(v,w)/2 with ω((q,p),(q′,p′))=qp′−pq′ (Regular Weyl systems and irreducibility).

[A1]

Countable Choice is the hypothesis used to make L2(R) a Hilbert space (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The data in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2givenalgebra

By [F1] and [F2], Uq and Vp are unitary. Direct evaluation gives (UqVpf)(x)=eiλp(x−q)f(x−q) and (VpUqf)(x)=eiλpxf(x−q), so UqVp=e−iλqpVpUq.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

The formula in the Statement yields (Wλ(q,p)f)(x)=eiλqp/2eiλp(x−q)f(x−q)=eiλp(x−q/2)f(x−q), proving the asserted Schrödinger formula directly.

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The commutation identity from step 1.1 gives VpUq′=eiλpq′Uq′Vp. Therefore Wλ(q,p)Wλ(q′,p′)=eiλ((qp+q′p′)/2+pq′)Uq+q′Vp+p′. The exponent coefficient satisfies ((qp+q′p′)/2+pq′)=((q+q′)(p+p′)−(qp′−pq′))/2, so this is e−iλ(qp′−pq′)/2Wλ(q+q′,p+p′), as required by [F3].

Boundary cases

  • The displayed formula requires no regularity or irreducibility result; its algebraic product identity also holds at λ=0.
  • The two basic operator families commute up to the displayed scalar; omitting the factor eiλqp/2 changes the Weyl convention.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources