Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Infinitely many modes admit inequivalent irreducible regular Weyl representations

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.

Let V=c00(N;R2) be the real vector space of finitely supported sequences v=((qj,pj))j≥1, with ω(v,w)=∑j(qjpj′−pjqj′); this finite sum defines a nondegenerate alternating form. For a=1,2, let Ha be the incomplete tensor product of copies of L2(R) with reference vector Ωa(x)=(a/π)1/4e−ax2/2. The finite-support operators

Wa(v)=⨂j≥1W1(qj,pj),(W1(q,p)f)(x)=eip(x−q/2)f(x−q), where all but finitely many factors are the identity, define irreducible Weyl representations with phase e−iω(v,w)/2 that are strongly continuous on every real line. They are inequivalent: a common local Gaussian average has expectation 1 in the first reference vector and limiting expectation 22/3<1 in every unit vector of the second representation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the finite-support symplectic space V, the two Gaussian reference vectors, and the one-mode Schrödinger formula.

[F1]

The one-mode operators W1(q,p) form a strongly continuous irreducible Weyl system with phase e−i(qp′−pq′)/2 (The Schrödinger Weyl system is regular and irreducible).

[F2]

The incomplete tensor product HΩ is the completion of the increasing finite-coordinate spaces, and for any unit Φ the local rank-one projection PjΦ is well-defined and orthogonal (Incomplete tensor product of one-mode Hilbert spaces with a reference vector).

[F3]

For a>0, the Gaussian Weyl average equals the projection onto Ωa; it commutes through bounded intertwiners, acts as PjΩa on a tensor coordinate, and the orbit of Ωa is total in L2(R) (The Gaussian Weyl average is a rank-one projection).

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, finite linear combinations of box indicators are dense in L2(Rm) for each finite m (Finite linear combinations of box indicators are dense in Lp(Rn) for 1≤p<∞).

[F6]

Strongly continuous Hilbert-valued vector fields with integrable norm have Bochner integrals; their norm is bounded by the integral of the norm, and bounded linear maps commute with these integrals (Bochner integrability criterion, Bochner integral norm inequality, Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The data in the Statement.

1.1A1F2F5givenalgebraconstruct

The sum defining ω is finite for v,w∈V; each term is bilinear and alternating, so ω is bilinear and alternating. If v≠0, choose j with qj2+pj2>0 and let w be supported only at j with (qj′,pj′)=(pj,−qj). Then ω(v,w)=−(qj2+pj2)≠0, proving nondegeneracy. For a∈{1,2}, rescaling [F5] gives ∥Ωa∥22=(a/π)1/2∫e−ax2 dx=1. Hence [F2] constructs the Hilbert space Ha and its unit reference vector Ωa∞.

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

If v has support in {1,…,n}, define on Hn=L2(Rn) the finite-coordinate operator W1(q1,p1)⊗⋯⊗W1(qn,pn). Each factor is unitary by [F1], so the product is unitary. Appending reference factors in the embeddings of [F2] commutes with this operator, because all acted-on coordinates are among the first n; the operators therefore define a unitary on the dense compatible union and extend to Ha. Its inverse is the operator for −v.

3.1A1F2F3F4step 2.1algebra

For each finite m≥1, the span of the vectors ⨂j=1mW1(qj,pj)Ωa is dense in Hm=L2(Rm). By [F4], finite linear combinations of indicators of finite-measure boxes B=I1×⋯×Im are dense. A box of zero measure has zero L2 class; for a positive finite-measure box, 1B=⨂j=1m1Ij. By [F3], each 1Ij can be approximated in L2(R) by finite linear combinations of the one-mode orbit vectors W1(q,p)Ωa. Fubini gives ∥⨂jhj∥2=∏j∥hj∥2, and the finite telescoping estimate ∥⨂jhj−⨂jkj∥2≤∑r=1m(∏j<r∥hj∥2)∥hr−kr∥2(∏j>r∥kj∥2) shows that products of these approximants converge to 1B. Expanding the finite tensor sums gives finite linear combinations of the stated product-orbit vectors, each the restriction of Wa(v)Ωa∞ for a finitely supported v by step 2.1. Hence their span is dense in Hm. For m=0, H0=C is spanned by Ωa∞.

3.2A1F1F2F4step 2.1algebra

At each of the finitely many coordinates in the union of the supports of v and w, [F1] gives W1(qj,pj)W1(qj′,pj′)=e−i(qjpj′−pjqj′)/2W1(qj+qj′,pj+pj′). Multiplication of these finite equations gives Wa(v)Wa(w)=e−iω(v,w)/2Wa(v+w); outside that finite union every factor is the identity. For fixed finitely supported v, choose n containing its support. On each box indicator from Hm, embed into Hr with r=max⁡(m,n); the orbit t↦Wa(tv)1B is then a finite tensor product of strongly continuous one-mode orbits, hence is continuous by the finite telescoping estimate. Linear combinations of box indicators are dense in each Hm by [F4], and the operators have norm 1, so continuity extends to every vector in the compatible union. That union is dense in Ha by [F2]; the same norm bound extends continuity to the completion.

3.3F2F3F4F6step 2.1

Fix a coordinate j and a parameter c>0. The local family ρa,j(q,p):=Wa(vj(q,p)), where vj(q,p) is supported only at coordinate j, is a strongly continuous one-mode Weyl family on Ha: this holds on finite-coordinate elementary tensors by [F1] and extends by density from box-step functions [F4] and the unitary norm bound. Thus for every vector ξ the weighted vector field e−cq2/4−p2/(4c)ρa,j(q,p)ξ is Bochner integrable by [F6]. On a finite-coordinate elementary tensor, its normalized integral acts on coordinate j by the one-mode average Ac and leaves the other coordinates fixed; [F3] identifies Ac with the projection onto Ωc. Therefore this coordinate average equals PjΩc on the dense compatible union and, by boundedness, on Ha. If a bounded map T intertwines two such local families, [F6] lets T pass through the vector-valued integral, so it intertwines the corresponding PjΩc. In particular, any bounded operator commuting with all global Wa(v) commutes with PjΩa by taking c=a. The projections for distinct coordinates commute by their finite-coordinate formulas.

4.1F2step 3.1

The orbit of Ωa∞ under finite-support Wa(v) is total in Ha. For each m, step 3.1 gives density of its finite-coordinate product-orbit vectors in Hm=L2(Rm); these are restrictions of the full finite-support orbit. Since the compatible union of the Hm is dense by [F2], the full orbit span is dense.

4.2F2step 3.3algebra

The joint fixed space ⋂j≥1ran⁡PjΩa is exactly CΩa∞. Let Qaξ:=⟨ξ,Ωa∞⟩Ωa∞. For ξ in a finite-coordinate space Hm and n≥m, Rn:=∏j=1nPjΩa satisfies Rnξ=⟨ξ,Ωa⊗m⟩Ωa∞=Qaξ. Since the finite-coordinate union is dense and Rn,Qa are contractions, Rn→Qa strongly on Ha. Every vector fixed by all PjΩa is fixed by every Rn, hence by Qa and lies in the reference line; conversely each PjΩa fixes Ωa∞.

4.3F2F5step 1.1step 3.3algebra

Let Pj=PjΩ1 act on H2. For a vector ξ∈Hm embedded using reference Ω2 and any j>m, the jth coordinate is Ω2, so the local rank-one formula gives ⟨Pjξ,ξ⟩=∣⟨Ω2,Ω1⟩∣2∥ξ∥2. For arbitrary η∈H2, approximate by such a finite-coordinate ξ. Since ∥Pj∥≤1, for every j>m the difference between these expectations is at most ∥η−ξ∥(∥η∥+∥ξ∥), and the difference between the squared norm terms is bounded by the same quantity. Density therefore gives lim⁡j→∞⟨Pjη,η⟩=∣⟨Ω2,Ω1⟩∣2∥η∥2. Direct substitution and [F5] give ⟨Ω2,Ω1⟩=21/4π∫Re−3x2/2 dx=23/4/3, so the limit coefficient is 22/3<1.

5.1F1F6step 3.3step 4.2step 4.1algebra

Let M be a nonzero closed subspace invariant under every Wa(v). For ξ∈M, the vector field defining the local average in step 3.3 takes values in M; its Bochner integral also lies in M, since the Bochner approximants are M-valued and M is closed. Thus every PjΩa and every Rn maps M into M. Choose 0≠η∈M. Totality in step 4.1 gives a finitely supported v with ⟨η,Wa(v)Ωa∞⟩≠0. Then ζ:=Wa(−v)η∈M satisfies ⟨ζ,Ωa∞⟩=⟨η,Wa(v)Ωa∞⟩≠0. By step 4.2, Rnζ→Qaζ=⟨ζ,Ωa∞⟩Ωa∞; closedness and linearity of M give Ωa∞∈M. Its total Weyl orbit forces M=Ha, proving irreducibility for each a.

6.1step 3.3step 4.3algebra∎

If a unitary U:H1→H2 intertwined the two global Weyl representations, it would intertwine their local coordinate families for every j. By the Bochner-integral argument in step 3.3 with c=1, it therefore intertwines the common averages PjΩ1 on the two spaces. Since PjΩ1Ω1∞=Ω1∞, the unit vector η=UΩ1∞ would satisfy PjΩ1η=η for all j and hence ⟨PjΩ1η,η⟩=1 for every j. Step 4.3 gives limit 22/3<1, a contradiction. Thus the two irreducible line-regular Weyl representations are inequivalent.

Boundary cases

  • Every vector of V has finite support; the proof of line regularity uses this finite-support hypothesis essentially.
  • The example fixes the nonzero central parameter λ=1; inequivalence arises from the two infinite tensor reference vectors, not from changing that parameter.
  • The construction gives two representations and does not classify all infinite-dimensional Weyl representations.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources