How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The one-panel trapezoidal bound is attained by x squared
Example
For on with , the trapezoidal error exactly attains the bound .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: on , one panel (), and mesh width .
Composite trapezoidal rule: on when .
Higher derivatives and the classes and : means the first two derivatives exist and are continuous.
A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: a continuous function on a closed bounded interval is Riemann integrable.
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: the integral of an integrable derivative is the endpoint difference of its antiderivative.
Verification
The function is , with and . By [F1], .
By [F4], is integrable. The antiderivative and [F5] give .
Therefore , while the bound in [F2] is . Equality holds, so this example attains the stated error bound.
Depends on
- Composite trapezoidal rule
- Higher derivatives and the classes $C^k$ and $C^\infty$
- Second-derivative error bound for the composite trapezoidal rule
- A continuous function on $[a,b]$ is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
- Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on $[a,b]$, differentiability on $(a,b)$, and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tobin A. Driscoll and Richard J. Braun, Fundamentals of Numerical Computation, §5.6.1–§5.6.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Endre Süli, Numerical Computation, course notes (standard reference, not scraped)