How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Second-derivative error bound for the composite trapezoidal rule
Statement
Let , let be an integer, and put . For in the sense of Higher derivatives and the classes and , the value from Composite trapezoidal rule satisfies The integral is the Riemann integral of The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded on as and , Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Reals , an integer , the mesh width , and .
Composite trapezoidal rule: is times the sum of the endpoint values with half weights and the interior mesh values with unit weights.
Higher derivatives and the classes and : means are continuous on , with derivatives at the endpoints understood in the one-sided sense.
A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: every continuous real function on a closed bounded interval is bounded and Riemann integrable.
Pointwise linear interpolation error from a second-derivative bound: if a function is on an open interval containing a panel , its endpoint affine interpolant satisfies , where .
If on and both are integrable then ; and : pointwise order between integrable functions on an increasing interval implies the same order between their integrals.
Integrable functions on form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and : sums and real scalar multiples of integrable functions are integrable and the integral is linear.
For : is integrable on if and only if it is integrable on and on , and then ; with the oriented form for arbitrary : the integral over adjacent intervals is the sum of the two interval integrals.
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: a continuous function with an integrable interior derivative has integral equal to the endpoint difference of an antiderivative.
Proof
Since is continuous on , [F3] shows it is bounded; set . The function is also Riemann integrable.
By [F2], the endpoint derivatives are the one-sided derivatives from within . Define on by At each join the polynomial piece matches the value and the first two one-sided derivatives of . Since are continuous on , these matches make on the open interval . It agrees with on and . For , let and let be the affine interpolant between and . Put on that panel. Applying [F4] to on each panel gives , and .
Let be the continuous piecewise-affine function equal to on each panel, and let be the continuous piecewise function equal to on each panel; continuity of at a knot holds because both adjacent formulas vanish there. Step 2.1 gives throughout .
By [F8], and ; the second identity follows by integrating on . Repeated additivity [F7] therefore gives , because each interior knot occurs twice with half weight, and .
The functions and are continuous and hence integrable by [F3]. Applying [F5] to the two pointwise inequalities in step 3.1 and using [F6] yields .
Substituting the identities from step 3.2 into step 4.1 gives , since . This is the claimed bound.
Depends on
- Composite trapezoidal rule
- Higher derivatives and the classes $C^k$ and $C^\infty$
- Pointwise linear interpolation error from a second-derivative bound
- For $a<c<b$: $f$ is integrable on $[a,b]$ if and only if it is integrable on $[a,c]$ and on $[c,b]$, and then $\int_a^b f = \int_a^c f + \int_c^b f$; with the oriented form for arbitrary $a,b,c$
- A continuous function on $[a,b]$ is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
- Integrable functions on $[a,b]$ form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and $\int_a^b(\lambda f+\mu g) = \lambda\int_a^b f + \mu\int_a^b g$
- If $f \le g$ on $[a,b]$ and both are integrable then $\int_a^b f \le \int_a^b g$; and $m(b-a) \le \int_a^b f \le M(b-a)$
- Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on $[a,b]$, differentiability on $(a,b)$, and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
- The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded $f$ on $[a,b]$ as $\sup_P L(f,P)$ and $\inf_P U(f,P)$, Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation $\int_a^b f$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tobin A. Driscoll and Richard J. Braun, Fundamentals of Numerical Computation, §5.6.1–§5.6.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Endre Süli, Numerical Computation, course notes (standard reference, not scraped)