Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The metrics d1, d2 and d∞ on Rn are metrics and are Lipschitz equivalent, with explicit constants

Example

Let n≥1 be a natural number and let Rn carry the three metrics

d1(x,y)=∑k<n∣xk−yk∣,d2(x,y)=∑k<n(xk−yk)2,d∞(x,y)=max⁡{∣xk−yk∣:k<n}

of Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it, where Rn is the set of functions from the von Neumann natural n to R. All three are metrics (Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric); that is Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it and is quoted here rather than reproved. What this example adds is that the three are Lipschitz equivalent with explicit constants (Topologically, uniformly and Lipschitz equivalent metrics on a set): for all x,y∈Rn,

d∞(x,y)  ≤  d2(x,y)  ≤  n  d∞(x,y),d∞(x,y)  ≤  d1(x,y)  ≤  n  d∞(x,y),d2(x,y)  ≤  d1(x,y)  ≤  n  d2(x,y).

Consequently the three are uniformly equivalent and topologically equivalent (Lipschitz equivalence implies uniform equivalence implies topological equivalence), so they determine the same open sets, the same convergent sequences and the same continuous maps on Rn.

The constants are best possible: taking x−y with a single nonzero coordinate gives equality in d∞=d2=d1, and taking all n coordinates equal in absolute value gives d1=n d∞ and d2=n d∞. Those two remarks are not needed for the equivalence and are not proved below.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural n≥1, elements x,y∈Rn, the list uk:=xk−yk for k<n, and the abbreviations M:=d∞(x,y), S:=d1(x,y)=∑k<n∣uk∣ and Q:=∑k<nuk2, so that d2(x,y)=Q; the canonical natural n is here read inside R as n⋅1R.

[L2]

Laws of finite sums (Laws of finite sums and finite products, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion): monotonicity, scaling, ∑k<nλ=nλ, a sum of nonnegative terms is nonnegative, and each single term is at most such a sum.

[L3]

The maximum of a nonempty finite set of reals exists, is one of its elements and bounds the set above (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set).

[L4]

Square roots (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}): every c≥0 has a unique c≥0 with (c)2=c; hence t2=t for t≥0 and ab=ab for a,b≥0, both by uniqueness. Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives, s≤t  ⟺  s2≤t2 (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives), so the same holds for square roots.

[L5]

Cauchy-Schwarz in root form (The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for finite sums): ∣∑k<nakbk∣≤∑k<nak2 ∑k<nbk2.

[L6]

Absolute value (Basic properties of the absolute value, Absolute value in an ordered field, Integer powers am): ∣t∣≥0, ∣t∣2=t2, and ∣t∣=t for t≥0.

[L7]

Order arithmetic: multiplying an inequality by a nonnegative element preserves it and inequalities may be added, in the strict forms of Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication and Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities together with the case of equality settled by totality (Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)); and n⋅1R>0 for n≥1 (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Since n≥1 the set {∣uk∣:k<n} is nonempty and finite, so M exists, equals ∣uj∣ for some j<n, satisfies M≥0, and bounds every ∣uk∣ above.

L3L6
1.2

The reals n⋅1R, n, Q and S are all nonnegative, and n⋅1R>0, so n>0; also M2=uj2 and uk2=∣uk∣2 for every k.

L2L4L6L7
2.1

First chain: M2=uj2≤Q because a single nonnegative term is at most the sum, so M=M2≤Q=d2(x,y); and Q=∑k<nuk2≤∑k<nM2=nM2 by monotonicity and scaling, so d2(x,y)=Q≤nM2=n M.

step 1.1step 1.2L2L4L7
2.2

Second chain: M=∣uj∣≤S because a single nonnegative term is at most the sum; and S=∑k<n∣uk∣≤∑k<nM=nM by monotonicity and scaling.

step 1.1step 1.2L2L7
2.3

Third chain: for every k<n, multiplying ∣uk∣≤S by the nonnegative ∣uk∣ gives uk2=∣uk∣2≤∣uk∣S, so summing and scaling gives Q≤S∑k<n∣uk∣=S2 and hence d2(x,y)=Q≤S2=S=d1(x,y); and Cauchy-Schwarz applied to the lists ak:=∣uk∣ and bk:=1 gives S=∣∑k<n∣uk∣⋅1∣≤∑k<nuk2 ∑k<n1=Q n=n d2(x,y).

step 1.1step 1.2L2L4L5L6L7
3.1

The three chains are exactly Lipschitz equivalences with positive constants: 1⋅d∞≤d2≤n d∞, 1⋅d∞≤d1≤n d∞ and 1⋅d2≤d1≤n d2, the constants 1, n and n all being positive.

step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3L7L8
4.1

Hence any two of d1, d2, d∞ are Lipschitz equivalent, and therefore uniformly equivalent and topologically equivalent; all three induce the same topology on Rn.

step 3.1L1L8∎

Remarks

  • The constants blow up with the dimension, and that is the whole point of the distinction. The comparison d1≤n d∞ is Lipschitz for each fixed n and useless uniformly in n, so no pair of constants serves all dimensions at once. Whether an analogue survives on spaces of infinite sequences is a question for a later page and is not addressed here.
  • Only n≥1 is treated, because d∞ is a maximum over the index set {0,…,n−1} and that set is empty when n=0 (Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it). For n=0 the space R0 is a single point and d1, d2 are identically 0 on it, while d∞ is not defined there at all, so there is nothing to compare.
  • Minkowski is not used here. The triangle inequalities were settled in Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it; what this page needs is only the comparison of the three values, and that runs on the finite-sum laws and Cauchy-Schwarz.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources