How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A smooth integrand satisfies the bound while an integrable singularity does not
Example
Assume Countable Choice. In one dimension compare with the integrable singular function for and . The first satisfies the smooth scrambled-net variance hypotheses; the second does not even have a finite second moment.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, a nested uniform scramble of a -net in base , and the two integrands.
Smooth-integrand variance rate for nestedly scrambled -nets: A continuously differentiable one-dimensional integrand has scrambled-net variance for fixed base and net quality.
Randomized quasi-Monte Carlo point sets and estimators: Each scrambled point is marginally uniform when the RQMC marginal condition holds.
Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable: Integrability and second moments are Lebesgue integrals against the uniform law.
Nested uniform scrambles preserve net counts and uniform marginals: Each scrambled point has uniform law and the net property is preserved almost surely.
Monotone convergence for the integral: Increasing nonnegative measurable truncations have integrals increasing to the integral of their pointwise limit.
Change of variables for expectation: For a nonnegative Borel function and random element , .
Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: Variance is defined for square-integrable variables and is finite only when their second moment is finite.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice is inherited from [F1].
Verification
The function has continuous derivative on . With , the hypotheses of [F1] hold, so its randomized-rule variance is .
For , the nonnegative Borel truncations increase pointwise to and satisfy . Likewise, increase pointwise to and satisfy . By [F5], while ; is not continuously differentiable at .
By [F2], ; [F4] gives every point uniform law. Since , [F6] and step 1.2 give . The squared estimate obeys , so its second moment is infinite. By [F7] it has no finite variance, and the smooth variance theorem does not apply to this integrable singularity.
Depends on
- Randomized quasi-Monte Carlo point sets and estimators
- Nested uniform scrambles preserve net counts and uniform marginals
- Smooth-integrand variance rate for nestedly scrambled $(\lambda,t,m,d)$-nets
- Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- Change of variables for expectation
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Art B. Owen, Local Antithetic Sampling with Scrambled Nets, §5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Art B. Owen, Monte Carlo Book: The Quasi-Monte Carlo Parts, Chapter 17 §17.5 (standard reference, not scraped)