Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A standard-Borel posterior kernel for countable data

Example

Let Θ={0,1} have prior probabilities 1/2,1/2, and let the data space be N0={0,1,2,…} with its power-set sigma-algebra. For n∈N0, set f0(n)=2−(n+1) and f1(n)=23(13)n. These are two geometric sampling laws. The prior-predictive mass is m(n)=12(f0(n)+f1(n))>0, and a data-indexed posterior is Πn(1)=f1(n)f0(n)+f1(n),Πn(0)=f0(n)f0(n)+f1(n).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the finite parameter space, prior, and countable data model in the example.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice (AC), as required by the general standard-Borel RCD route. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

The prior probability and sampling kernel define the proper Bayesian model. Bayesian model as a prior and sampling kernel

[F2]

A data-indexed posterior kernel is a probability kernel whose composition with the observation is a posterior RCD. Bayesian posterior as a regular conditional law

[F3]

When both the parameter and data spaces are standard Borel, the posterior RCD factors through the data coordinate as a measurable posterior kernel. Standard-Borel Bayesian posterior kernel exists

[F4]

For 0≤r<1, the geometric series satisfies ∑n=0∞rn=(1−r)−1. For ∣r∣<1, ∑k≥0rk=1/(1−r), and for ∣r∣≥1 the series diverges

[F5]

A standard-Borel space is measurably isomorphic to a Polish space. Standard Borel spaces

[F6]

A Polish space is a separable space whose topology is induced by a complete metric. Polish spaces are separable completely metrizable spaces

Verification

Given: The assumptions and countable model in the example.

1.1givenF1F4F5F6algebra

The discrete metric on N0 is complete because every Cauchy sequence is eventually constant; N0 itself is a countable dense subset. Its topology is discrete, so its Borel sigma-algebra is the power set. The finite discrete parameter space has the same properties. Thus both spaces are standard Borel by [F5]–[F6]. By [F4], ∑nf0(n)=1 and ∑nf1(n)=1, so they define probability sampling laws and the prior in [F1] gives a Bayesian model.

2.1givenA1F3step 1.1algebra

Since both spaces are standard Borel and AC holds, [F3] supplies a data-indexed posterior kernel. For every n, both f0(n) and f1(n) are positive and finite, so m(n)>0 and the displayed values are in [0,1] and sum to one. Every function on the discrete data space is measurable, hence n↦Πn is a probability kernel.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For i∈{0,1} and every B⊆N0, ∑n∈BΠn(i)m(n)=12∑n∈Bfi(n)=J({i}×B). Adding the identities for i=0,1 proves the rectangle identity for every A⊆Θ and every data event B. Thus the explicit kernel is a data-indexed posterior version; all its data values have positive prior-predictive mass.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources