How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A standard-Borel posterior kernel for countable data
Example
Let have prior probabilities , and let the data space be with its power-set sigma-algebra. For , set and . These are two geometric sampling laws. The prior-predictive mass is , and a data-indexed posterior is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the finite parameter space, prior, and countable data model in the example.
The Axiom of Choice (AC), as required by the general standard-Borel RCD route. The Axiom of Choice
The prior probability and sampling kernel define the proper Bayesian model. Bayesian model as a prior and sampling kernel
A data-indexed posterior kernel is a probability kernel whose composition with the observation is a posterior RCD. Bayesian posterior as a regular conditional law
When both the parameter and data spaces are standard Borel, the posterior RCD factors through the data coordinate as a measurable posterior kernel. Standard-Borel Bayesian posterior kernel exists
For , the geometric series satisfies . For , , and for the series diverges
A standard-Borel space is measurably isomorphic to a Polish space. Standard Borel spaces
A Polish space is a separable space whose topology is induced by a complete metric. Polish spaces are separable completely metrizable spaces
Verification
Given: The assumptions and countable model in the example.
The discrete metric on is complete because every Cauchy sequence is eventually constant; itself is a countable dense subset. Its topology is discrete, so its Borel sigma-algebra is the power set. The finite discrete parameter space has the same properties. Thus both spaces are standard Borel by [F5]–[F6]. By [F4], and , so they define probability sampling laws and the prior in [F1] gives a Bayesian model.
Since both spaces are standard Borel and AC holds, [F3] supplies a data-indexed posterior kernel. For every , both and are positive and finite, so and the displayed values are in and sum to one. Every function on the discrete data space is measurable, hence is a probability kernel.
For and every , . Adding the identities for proves the rectangle identity for every and every data event . Thus the explicit kernel is a data-indexed posterior version; all its data values have positive prior-predictive mass.
Depends on
- Bayesian model as a prior and sampling kernel
- Bayesian posterior as a regular conditional law
- Standard-Borel Bayesian posterior kernel exists
- Standard Borel spaces
- Polish spaces are separable completely metrizable spaces
- The Axiom of Choice
- For $|r| < 1$, $\sum_{k \ge 0} r^k = 1/(1-r)$, and for $|r| \ge 1$ the series diverges
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alicia A. Johnson, Miles Q. Ott, and Mine Dogucu, Bayes Rules!, Chapter 2 §§2.3.1–2.3.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Gelman, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern, David B. Dunson, Aki Vehtari, and Donald B. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed., Chapter 1 §1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)