How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bayesian posterior as a regular conditional law
Definition
Let a proper Bayesian model be given, and let be its joint prior-predictive probability on , supplied by A prior and model kernel define a joint law. More generally, let be any probability space carrying parameter and data random elements and whose joint law is (Probability measures and probability spaces, Random elements and real random variables, Law or distribution of a random element). A posterior regular conditional distribution (posterior RCD) is a regular conditional distribution of given , in the sense of Regular conditional distribution. It is a kernel indexed by the sample point . The canonical realization is with and coordinate maps , .
A data-indexed posterior kernel is a probability kernel from to (Measure kernel and probability kernel) for which is a conditional law of given (Conditional law given a random element). Equivalently, for every and , where is the data marginal (equal to ). This kernel is indexed by data values, not sample points.
The definition asserts no existence of either conditional kernel. Values of a data-indexed version on a measurable -null set are not fixed by the conditional-law identities; replacing them there by a fixed probability preserves those identities. A dominated-density construction is a separate route: Bayes formula for dominated kernels requires a proper prior, a sigma-finite data measure, and a specified jointly measurable sampling density, and fills fibres whose marginal density is zero or infinite with the prior. It does not require the data space to be standard Borel.
Depends on
- Bayesian model as a prior and sampling kernel
- The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
- A prior and model kernel define a joint law
- Probability measures and probability spaces
- Random elements and real random variables
- Law or distribution of a random element
- Regular conditional distribution
- Conditional law given a random element
- Measure kernel and probability kernel
- Bayes formula for dominated kernels
Used by
- Posterior RCD exists for a standard-Borel parameter Corollary
- An identifiable model can have persistent ABC summary distortion Counterexample
- A base-null observation is a prior-predictive null fiber Example
- A Bayesian posterior RCD indexed by the sample point Example
- A dominated posterior on a nonstandard-Borel observation space Example
- A finite Bayesian update and a null-data posterior version Example
- A standard-Borel posterior kernel for countable data Example
- A sufficient summary preserves the Bayesian posterior Theorem
- ABC targets the density-defined summary posterior at zero tolerance Theorem
- Dirichlet-process posterior update Theorem
- Standard-Borel Bayesian posterior kernel exists Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Gelman, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern, David B. Dunson, Aki Vehtari, and Donald B. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed., Chapter 1 §§1.1–1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alicia A. Johnson, Miles Q. Ott, and Mine Dogucu, Bayes Rules!, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)