Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The supremum metric d∞(f,g)=sup⁡x∣f(x)−g(x)∣ on the bounded real-valued functions on a set

Example

Let S be a nonempty set, let B(S) be the set of bounded functions S→R and let d∞(f,g)=sup⁡{∣f(s)−g(s)∣:s∈S} be the supremum metric; that this is a metric is The supremum metric d∞(f,g)=sup⁡x∣f(x)−g(x)∣ is a metric on the bounded real-valued functions on a nonempty set and is quoted here rather than reproved. This example records two things about it.

  1. The constants form an isometric copy of the real line. For c∈R let c^∈B(S) be the constant function with value c. Then c↦c^ is an isometric embedding of (R,dR) into (B(S),d∞) (Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset, The absolute value makes R a metric space: d(x,y)=∣x−y∣ is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (x−r,x+r), and it is unbounded): d∞(c^,c^ ′)=∣c−c ′∣(c,c ′∈R).
  2. The supremum need not be attained. Take S=N, so that B(N) is the set of bounded sequences of reals (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences), and put f(k):=1−1k+1(k∈N),g:=0^. Then f,g∈B(N), d∞(f,g)=1, and ∣f(k)−g(k)∣<1 for every k∈N. So d∞(f,g) is a supremum that is not a maximum, and no single point of S realises the distance.

The index shift in 1/(k+1) is forced: N contains 0 (The natural numbers N (von Neumann)) and sequences here are indexed from 0 (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences), so 1/k would be undefined at k=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty set S; reals c,c′; the constant functions c^,c^′:S→R; and, for S=N, the functions f(k)=1−1/(k+1) and g=0^, together with D(f,g):={ ∣f(k)−g(k)∣:k∈N }.

[L2]

Least upper bounds: a nonempty subset of R bounded above has a unique least upper bound (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Suprema and infima are unique); bounded subsets of R are as in Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set.

[L3]

Epsilon characterisation of the supremum: for a nonempty T⊆R bounded above and an upper bound u of T, one has u=sup⁡T if and only if for every real ε>0 there is t∈T with u−ε<t (Epsilon characterisation of the supremum).

[L4]
[L5]

Absolute value: ∣t∣=t for t≥0, ∣t∣≥0 (Basic properties of the absolute value, Absolute value in an ordered field); and the usual metric of R is dR(c,c′)=∣c−c′∣ (The absolute value makes R a metric space: d(x,y)=∣x−y∣ is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (x−r,x+r), and it is unbounded).

[L6]

Isometric embedding: a map preserving distances exactly (Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset); trichotomy and transitivity of the order of R (Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Each constant function c^ has range {c}, a bounded subset of R, so c^∈B(S); and {∣c^(s)−c^′(s)∣:s∈S}={∣c−c′∣}, a nonempty one-element set whose least upper bound is ∣c−c′∣ itself.

givenL1L2L5
2.1

For S=N: each k+1 is a natural ≥1, so 1/(k+1) is a positive real and 0≤f(k)=1−1/(k+1)<1; hence the range of f is bounded and f∈B(N), while g=0^ is bounded by step 1.1, and D(f,g)={ 1−1/(k+1):k∈N } is nonempty with 1 as an upper bound.

step 1.1L4L5
2.2

Claim 1: by step 1.1, d∞(c^,c^′)=∣c−c′∣=dR(c,c′) for all reals c,c′, which is exactly the statement that c↦c^ is an isometric embedding of (R,dR) into (B(S),d∞).

step 1.1L1L5L6
3.1

d∞(f,g)=1: the number 1 is an upper bound of D(f,g) by step 2.1, and for an arbitrary real ε>0 choose a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε and put k:=n−1, a natural since n≥1, so that 1−1/(k+1)=1−1/n>1−ε; by the epsilon characterisation 1 is the least upper bound.

step 2.1L3L4L6
4.1

The supremum is not attained: every element of D(f,g) has the form 1−1/(k+1) with 1/(k+1)>0, hence is <1=d∞(f,g), so no k∈N satisfies ∣f(k)−g(k)∣=d∞(f,g).

step 2.1step 3.1L4L6
5.1

Claims 1 and 2 are established, by step 2.2 and by steps 3.1 and 4.1 respectively.

step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources