How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The rank-three one-defect link-state module
Example
Let be any field, , and consider . Its basis consists of the state with an arc between sites and and a defect at site , and the state with a defect at site and an arc between sites and . For the elementary diagrams and the Gram form ,
and
At the form is nondegenerate, so is simple by Nonzero Temperley–Lieb cell forms give all simple heads.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a parameter , and .
The basis of consists of link states with sites and defects; its action is stacking on the right (Temperley–Lieb link-state standard modules by defect number, The link-state quotient is a right Temperley–Lieb module).
has a cap at top sites , a cup at bottom sites , and vertical strands elsewhere; stacking removes each closed loop with coefficient (Temperley–Lieb planar diagram data and endomorphism modules).
The Gram form is computed by reflecting and gluing link states, and is the cellular form (The link-state Gram form is symmetric and invariant, The Temperley–Lieb link-state diagram basis is cellular).
A nonzero link-state cell form gives a simple head, and its quotient is simple; if the form is nondegenerate then that quotient is the whole module (Nonzero Temperley–Lieb cell forms give all simple heads).
Verification
For and there is one arc. The only noncrossing placements are , with arc and defect , and , with defect and arc . The dimension formula of Link states are counted by a ballot-number difference gives , so these two distinct states are the full basis.
For , the cap of joins the two endpoints of 's arc, making one closed loop; the bottom cup of leaves the same arc, so . For , tracing from the defect at site through the top cap of , then through the arc of and the vertical strand at site , leaves a defect at site and a cup at sites , so . For , tracing from the defect at site through 's cap, then through 's arc and the vertical strand at site , leaves the arc at sites and a defect at site , so . For , the cap closes 's arc into one loop and the bottom cup leaves , so .
Gluing with its reflection creates one loop, as does gluing with its reflection, so . Gluing to the reflection of creates one through path and no loop, so ; by symmetry . These four values give the displayed Gram matrix.
At , if lies in the radical then pairing with gives and pairing with gives . Thus the radical is zero and the cell-form quotient is itself. The form is nonzero, so [F4] makes this module simple.
Remarks
The two basis half-diagrams use the same boundary convention as the A-page definition; defects are the strands meeting the top boundary.
Depends on
- Temperley–Lieb link-state standard modules by defect number
- The link-state quotient is a right Temperley–Lieb module
- Link states are counted by a ballot-number difference
- The link-state Gram form is symmetric and invariant
- Temperley–Lieb planar diagram data and endomorphism modules
- The Temperley–Lieb link-state diagram basis is cellular
- Nonzero Temperley–Lieb cell forms give all simple heads
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.