How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The link-state quotient is a right Temperley–Lieb module
Statement
For , , , and as in Temperley–Lieb link-state standard modules by defect number, the rule defines a unital right -module structure on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring with unit, , , an allowed defect number , and the quotient .
The modules are free on noncrossing matching diagrams; composition stacks the left factor above the right factor, deletes each closed cycle with a factor , and extends bilinearly (Temperley–Lieb planar diagram data and endomorphism modules).
Stacking is associative and the vertical matching is a two-sided identity; is a unital algebra (Stacking is associative and horizontal juxtaposition is strict monoidal).
is spanned by diagrams with fewer than propagating components, and is the quotient by this span (Temperley–Lieb link-state standard modules by defect number).
Proof
For basis diagrams and , both and are represented by the same three-layer glued graph, with the same exterior paths and the same number of closed components. By [F1] their coefficients are the same power of , and [F2] gives . The identity diagram leaves unchanged. Bilinearity extends these equalities to , making it a right -module before quotienting.
If , every propagating component of must pass through a distinct propagating component of at the glued -boundary; stacking cannot create a new path from the top -boundary of to the exterior bottom boundary of when no such path existed in . Thus every basis term of has fewer than propagating components. By [F3], is a right submodule.
The action therefore descends to the quotient , and the module identities from step 1.1 descend with it. Since the diagram basis of is partitioned into diagrams with exactly propagating components and those with fewer, the surviving cosets form the stated link-state basis.
Depends on
Used by
- A zero Temperley–Lieb cell form can have a nonzero simple module Counterexample
- The rank-three one-defect link-state module Example
- Exact Temperley–Lieb truncation reduces decomposition to trivial factors Lemma
- Restriction of a link-state module has a two-step filtration Lemma
- Signed forest candidates, wall homomorphisms, and their composition Lemma
- The annular central element constructs Temperley–Lieb reflection maps Lemma
- The link-state Gram form is symmetric and invariant Lemma
- The zero-loop perfect-matching standard module is simple Lemma
- The Temperley–Lieb link-state diagram basis is cellular Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Temperley–Lieb link-state standard modules by defect number.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David Ridout and Yvan Saint-Aubin, Standard Modules, Induction and the Structure of the Temperley-Lieb Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Enyang and Frederick M. Goodman, Cellular bases for algebras with a Jones basic construction (standard reference, not scraped)