How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
In Zp squared, topological generation is detected by the Frattini quotient coordinates
Example
In , a pair topologically generates if and only if their reductions modulo form a basis of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The pro- group .
Topological generation in a finitely generated pro- group is detected on the Frattini quotient (A subset topologically generates a finitely generated pro-p group exactly when its image spans the Frattini quotient over Fp).
The external direct product is coordinatewise (The external direct product with componentwise multiplication).
Verification
By coordinatewise addition in [F1], the subgroup consists of pairs whose two coordinates are divisible by . Therefore .
The Frattini quotient of the abelian pro- group is exactly , so [L1] says that a subset topologically generates exactly when its image spans . For a pair , spanning is the same as being a basis.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexander Lubotzky, Combinatorial group theory for pro-p groups (standard reference, not scraped)