Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

7 results · all verified · 5 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Pro P Groups and the P Adic Integers - Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples make the compatible-digit model explicit, show concrete convergence and Cauchy behavior in Zp, identify easy completions and Frattini quotients, and isolate the distinction between topological density and abstract equality.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

A p-adic integer is encoded by a compatible sequence of residue digits

Example

For fixed digits a0,a1,a2,{0,,p1}, the sequence

xn:=a0+a1p++an1pn1(modpn)

defines an element of Zp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Digits ai{0,,p1} for i0.

[L1]

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For each n1, reducing xn+1 modulo pn removes only the final term anpn, so xn+1modpn=xn. Thus the tuple (xn)n1 is compatible.

givenalgebra
2.1

By [L1], every compatible tuple defines an element of Zp. Hence the displayed digit data encodes a p-adic integer.

L1step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

The partial sums of a p-adic expansion converge in the inverse-limit topology

Example

If xZp is represented by digits a0,a1,, then the partial sums

sn:=a0+a1p++an1pn1Z

converge to x in the inverse-limit topology on Zp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An element xZp with compatible digit truncations (snmodpr)r.

[L1]

The inverse-limit topology is the p-adic metric topology (The inverse-limit topology on Zp agrees with the p-adic metric topology).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For each fixed r1, once nr the residue of sn modulo pr is already a0+a1p++ar1pr1, which is exactly the r-th coordinate of x. So the first r coordinates of sn and x agree for all sufficiently large n.

givenalgebra
2.1

Step 1.1 says that for every r, the sequence eventually lies in the basic neighbourhood of x determined by the first r coordinates. By [L1], that is exactly convergence to x in the inverse-limit topology.

L1step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

A standard p-adic digit sequence is Cauchy and converges in Zp

Example

The sequence

tn:=1+p++pn1ZZp

is Cauchy for the additive p-adic metric and converges in Zp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The sequence tn=1+p++pn1 in Zp.

[F1]

The p-adic metric measures how many initial residue coordinates agree (The p-adic metric on Zp is determined by the first coordinate at which two compatible residue systems differ).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

If m>n, then tmtn=pn(1+p++pmn1), so the first n residue coordinates of tm and tn agree. By [F1], this gives dp(tm,tn)pn. Hence (tn) is Cauchy.

F1givenalgebra
2.1

Since Zp is complete by [L1], the Cauchy sequence (tn) converges to some element of Zp.

L1step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

A finite p-group is naturally isomorphic to its own pro-p completion

Example

If P is a finite p-group, then the canonical map PP^(p) is an isomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite p-group P.

[F1]

The pro-p completion is the inverse limit over all finite p-group quotients (The pro-p completion of an abstract group is the inverse limit over its finite p-group quotients).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The subgroup 1P is one of the indexing subgroups in [F1], and its quotient is the initial object P/1P of the quotient diagram: it has the natural quotient map to every P/N.

F1givenalgebra
2.1

A compatible tuple is uniquely determined by its coordinate in the initial object P/1, and every element of P/1 determines such a tuple by its images in the other quotients. Therefore P^(p)P, and the canonical completion map is exactly this isomorphism. The conclusion is consistent with [L1], since P was already pro-p to begin with.

L1step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-04Open item page →

The Frattini quotient of Zp is the one-dimensional vector space Fp

Example

For the additive pro-p group Zp, one has

Φ(Zp)=pZpandZp/Φ(Zp)Fp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The additive pro-p group Zp.

[L1]

For a finitely generated pro-p group, the Frattini subgroup is [G,G]Gp (For a finitely generated pro-p group, the Frattini subgroup is the closure of [G,G]G^p).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The additive group Zp is abelian, so [Zp,Zp]=0. Its pth-power subgroup in additive notation is pZp, which is already closed. Therefore [L1] gives Φ(Zp)=pZp.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

Reduction modulo p is a surjective homomorphism ZpZ/pZ with kernel pZp. By step 1.1, the quotient by Φ(Zp) is therefore Fp.

step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-04Open item page →

In Zp squared, topological generation is detected by the Frattini quotient coordinates

Example

In G=Zp×Zp, a pair (u,v) topologically generates G if and only if their reductions modulo p form a basis of Fp2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The pro-p group G=Zp×Zp.

[L1]

Topological generation in a finitely generated pro-p group is detected on the Frattini quotient (A subset topologically generates a finitely generated pro-p group exactly when its image spans the Frattini quotient over Fp).

[F1]

The external direct product is coordinatewise (The external direct product G×H with componentwise multiplication).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By coordinatewise addition in [F1], the subgroup pG consists of pairs whose two coordinates are divisible by p. Therefore G/pG(Zp/pZp)×(Zp/pZp)Fp2.

F1givenalgebra
2.1

The Frattini quotient of the abelian pro-p group G is exactly G/pG, so [L1] says that a subset topologically generates G exactly when its image spans Fp2. For a pair (u,v), spanning Fp2 is the same as being a basis.

L1step 1.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

The embedded integers form an abstractly proper but topologically dense subgroup of Zp

Statement refuted

Every dense subgroup of Zp is all of Zp as an abstract subgroup.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The embedded copy of Z inside Zp.

[L2]

The additive group of Zp is not abstractly cyclic, even though the closure of Z1 is all of Zp (The additive topological group of Zp is topologically generated by 1, although it is not abstractly cyclic).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the embedded copy of Z is dense in Zp.

L1given
2.1

The embedded copy of Z is exactly Z1. By [L2], its closure is all of Zp but it is not equal to Zp as an abstract subgroup. Thus a dense subgroup can be proper.

L2step 1.1
3.1

Therefore the stated universal claim is false, and the embedded copy of Z is the required counterexample.

step 1.1step 2.1

Sources