How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is an ideal of but is not a subring under the library's unital convention
Example
is an ideal of but is not a subring under the library's unital convention.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The subset .
A two-sided ideal is an additive subgroup with multiplication absorption (Left, right and two-sided ideals).
The ideal criterion is subtraction closure and absorption (Ideal criteria and intersections of ideals).
A subring contains the ambient identity (Subring: a subset containing and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication).
is a ring with identity (The integers form a commutative ring).
Verification
Differences of even integers are even, and multiplying an even integer by any integer remains even, so is an ideal.
The identity does not belong to .
Thus the missing identity rules out as a unital subring.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Janssen and Lindsey, Rings with Inquiry, Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)