How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The zero ideal of is prime but not maximal
Statement refuted
Every prime ideal of a commutative ring is maximal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The zero ideal in .
A prime ideal is proper and satisfies the zero-product implication; a maximal ideal has no proper intermediate ideal (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).
The ideal criterion verifies subtraction closure and absorption (Ideal criteria and intersections of ideals).
is a nonzero commutative ring (The integers form a commutative ring).
Integer cancellation implies only if or (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).
Counterexample
The set is a proper ideal, and [L4] shows that implies or .
The ideal satisfies .
Hence is prime but not maximal, refuting the statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 42 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ernst, An Inquiry-Based Approach to Abstract Algebra, Maximal and Prime Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)