How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ideals and Quotient Rings: Examples and Counterexamples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Null rational sequences form a maximal ideal in the ring of rational Cauchy sequences
Example
Null rational sequences form a maximal ideal in the ring of rational Cauchy sequences.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ring of rational Cauchy sequences and its subset of null sequences.
Maximal ideals are maximal among proper ideals (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).
Rational Cauchy sequences form a commutative ring (Cauchy sequences form a commutative ring).
is an ideal of (Null sequences form an ideal).
The null ideal is maximal in (The null ideal is maximal).
Verification
The ambient object is the commutative ring of [L2], and is an ideal by [L3].
The maximality statement in [L4] is precisely maximality in the ideal order of [L1].
Thus null rational sequences give a maximal ideal.
The reals are the quotient of rational Cauchy sequences by the maximal ideal of null sequences
Example
The reals are the quotient of rational Cauchy sequences by the maximal ideal of null sequences.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Cauchy-sequence ring and the null ideal .
The real numbers are defined as the quotient of rational Cauchy sequences by null sequences (The real numbers).
Rational Cauchy sequences form the ring (Cauchy sequences form a commutative ring).
is an ideal of (Null sequences form an ideal).
is maximal in (The null ideal is maximal).
Quotienting a commutative ring by a maximal ideal gives a field ( is a field if and only if is a maximal ideal).
The constructed real numbers form a field (The reals form a field).
Verification
By [L1], the underlying set and operations of are the quotient .
Since [L3] and [L4] make a maximal ideal, [L5] also identifies as a field.
This is the stated quotient realisation.
For every integer , is a maximal ideal of if and only if is prime
Example
For every integer , is a maximal ideal of if and only if is prime.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer .
is the quotient ring (For every , the congruence-class ring is the quotient ring ).
A quotient is a field exactly for a maximal ideal ( is a field if and only if is a maximal ideal).
A maximal ideal in a commutative ring is prime (Every maximal ideal of a commutative ring is prime).
An integer greater than is prime exactly when it has the Euclid property (For an integer : is prime if and only if, for all integers and , implies or ).
is a field for prime (For every prime , the two operations on make it a field).
is a commutative ring (The integers form a commutative ring).
Verification
If is prime, [L5] and [L1] make a field, so [L2] makes maximal.
If is maximal, [L3] makes it prime; applying this to a factorisation gives the Euclid property and [L4] makes prime.
The two implications prove the example.
The zero ideal of is prime but not maximal
Statement refuted
Every prime ideal of a commutative ring is maximal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The zero ideal in .
A prime ideal is proper and satisfies the zero-product implication; a maximal ideal has no proper intermediate ideal (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).
The ideal criterion verifies subtraction closure and absorption (Ideal criteria and intersections of ideals).
is a nonzero commutative ring (The integers form a commutative ring).
Integer cancellation implies only if or (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).
Counterexample
The set is a proper ideal, and [L4] shows that implies or .
The ideal satisfies .
Hence is prime but not maximal, refuting the statement.
is an ideal of but is not a subring under the library's unital convention
Example
is an ideal of but is not a subring under the library's unital convention.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The subset .
A two-sided ideal is an additive subgroup with multiplication absorption (Left, right and two-sided ideals).
The ideal criterion is subtraction closure and absorption (Ideal criteria and intersections of ideals).
A subring contains the ambient identity (Subring: a subset containing and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication).
is a ring with identity (The integers form a commutative ring).
Verification
Differences of even integers are even, and multiplying an even integer by any integer remains even, so is an ideal.
The identity does not belong to .
Thus the missing identity rules out as a unital subring.
is the kernel of , so
Example
is the kernel of , so .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Rings and the coordinate projection , .
The product ring has coordinatewise operations (The product ring with componentwise operations, its identity and its units ).
A ring homomorphism preserves operations and identity (Ring homomorphism: additive, multiplicative, and required to send to ).
A ring-homomorphism kernel is a two-sided ideal (The kernel of a ring homomorphism is a two-sided ideal).
The first ring isomorphism theorem gives quotient-by-kernel isomorphisms (First isomorphism theorem for rings: ).
Ideals are additive subgroups with absorption (Left, right and two-sided ideals).
Verification
Coordinatewise operations make a surjective ring homomorphism.
Its kernel is exactly , which is therefore an ideal.
The kernel calculation yields .
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.