Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: an arbitrary intersection of open sets is open in every topological space

Statement

False claim: in every topological space (X,T)(X,\mathcal{T}) (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison), if {Ui:iI}\{\, U_i : i \in I \,\} is any family of open sets then iIUi\bigcap_{i \in I} U_i is open.

The topology axioms grant closure under arbitrary unions and under intersections of finitely many open sets, and the asymmetry is not a weakness of the axioms chosen: strengthening (T3) to arbitrary intersections would exclude the spaces this subject exists to study. Two witnesses are given below, one in a space with no metric in sight and one in R\mathbb{R} with its usual topology, so that the failure cannot be blamed on exotic examples.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An infinite set XX carrying the cofinite topology and a point pXp \in X, with I:=X{p}I := X \setminus \{p\}; and R\mathbb{R} with its usual topology, together with the family Uk:=B(0, 1/(k+1))U_k := B(0,\ 1/(k+1)) for kNk \in \mathbb{N}, where 1/(k+1)1/(k+1) abbreviates the inverse of the canonical natural (k+1)1R(k+1) \cdot 1_{\mathbb{R}}.

[A1]

A topology is closed under arbitrary unions and binary intersections; a set is open exactly when it belongs to the topology (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).

[L1]

In the cofinite topology the open sets are \varnothing together with the sets of finite complement; a subset of a finite set is finite and a union of two finite sets is finite (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies); "infinite" means "not finite" (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable).

[L3]

Every ball is an open set of the metric topology, and URU \subseteq \mathbb{R} is open in it exactly when every point of UU has a ball around it inside UU (Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open sets are open, open balls are open and closed balls are closed, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement).

[L4]

For every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon (For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon); for n1n \ge 1 the canonical natural n1Rn \cdot 1_{\mathbb{R}} is positive (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing) and its inverse 1/n1/n is positive (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[L5]

u0|u| \ge 0, and u=0|u| = 0 only for u=0u = 0; for c>0c > 0 one has u<c|u| < c if and only if c<u<c-c < u < c (Absolute value in an ordered field, Basic properties of the absolute value).

[L6]

Every nonzero natural number is a successor, so n1n \ge 1 gives n=m+1n = m + 1 for some mNm \in \mathbb{N} (Every nonzero natural number is a successor).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Since XX is infinite, X{p}X \setminus \{p\} is infinite: were it finite, X={p}(X{p})X = \{p\} \cup (X \setminus \{p\}) would be a union of two finite sets and hence finite. In particular II \ne \varnothing.

givenL1
1.2

For each xIx \in I the set X{x}X \setminus \{x\} is open in the cofinite topology, its complement {x}\{x\} being finite; and xI(X{x})=XI={p}\bigcap_{x \in I} (X \setminus \{x\}) = X \setminus I = \{p\}.

givenL1
1.3

For every kNk \in \mathbb{N} the natural k+1k+1 satisfies k+11k + 1 \ge 1, so 1/(k+1)1/(k+1) is a positive real and Uk=B(0, 1/(k+1))U_k = B(0,\ 1/(k+1)) is a legitimate ball; each UkU_k is open in the usual topology of R\mathbb{R}.

givenL2L3L4
1.4

0Uk0 \in U_k for every kk, since 00=0<1/(k+1)|0 - 0| = 0 < 1/(k+1).

givenL4L5
1.5

Let xRx \in \mathbb{R} with x0x \ne 0; then x>0|x| > 0 by [L5], so [L4] gives a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<x1/n < |x|, and [L6] writes n=m+1n = m+1 with mNm \in \mathbb{N}; hence x0=x>1/(m+1)|x - 0| = |x| > 1/(m+1), so xB(0, 1/(m+1))=Umx \notin B(0,\ 1/(m+1)) = U_m.

L4L5L6
1.6

{0}\{0\} is not open in the usual topology of R\mathbb{R}: a ball B(0,r)=(r,r)B(0,r) = (-r, r) with r>0r > 0 contains the point 1/n1/n for a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<r1/n < r supplied by [L4], and 1/n>01/n > 0, so 1/nB(0,r)1/n \in B(0,r) and 1/n01/n \ne 0; hence no ball around 00 lies inside {0}\{0\}.

L2L3L4L5
2.1

{p}\{p\} is not open in the cofinite topology: it is nonempty, and its complement X{p}X \setminus \{p\} is infinite by step 1.1, so it is neither \varnothing nor a set of finite complement.

step 1.1L1
2.2

By steps 1.4 and 1.5, kNUk={0}\bigcap_{k \in \mathbb{N}} U_k = \{0\}.

step 1.4step 1.5
3.1

By steps 1.2 and 2.1 the family {X{x}:xI}\{\, X \setminus \{x\} : x \in I \,\} consists of open subsets of the cofinite space XX, is nonempty, and has intersection {p}\{p\}, which is not open; so the claim fails already in a space defined without any reference to R\mathbb{R}.

step 1.2step 2.1A1
4.1

By steps 2.2 and 1.6 the sets UkU_k are open in R\mathbb{R}, their intersection is {0}\{0\}, and {0}\{0\} is not open; with step 3.1 the false claim is refuted twice over, once in a non-metrizable setting and once in a metrizable one.

step 1.3step 3.1step 2.2step 1.6A1

Remarks

  • What is true instead. Intersections of finitely many open sets are open, which is axiom (T3) iterated (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison); and arbitrary intersections of closed sets are closed, which is its dual (C2). The intersection of an arbitrary family of open sets is in general only a set whose interior may be smaller than itself, and the interior operator exists precisely to name what survives.

  • The ℝ witness is the shape that recurs. A decreasing family of balls of radii shrinking to zero has the centre as its intersection, and a singleton is open only in a space where the point is isolated. The index shift is the usual one for this library: the radii are 1/(k+1)1/(k+1) for kNk \in \mathbb{N}, not 1/k1/k, since N\mathbb{N} contains 00.

  • The corresponding failure inside R\mathbb{R} alone is already published (FALSE: an arbitrary intersection of open subsets of R\mathbb{R} is open), stated there in the order-native vocabulary of the topology of R\mathbb{R}. The present item is the statement about topological spaces in general, which that page explicitly declined to make.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 96 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources