How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Geodesic curvature need not equal ambient curve curvature
Statement
False: For every oriented Riemannian surface with its induced metric and every unit-speed curve in , the signed geodesic curvature equals the ordinary Euclidean curvature of the space curve, .
Source locator
Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature, Chapter 9, §“The Gauss–Bonnet Formula,” printed pp. 163–164 (PDF pp. 179–180), lines 6421–6431, defines the signed surface curvature from the normal component of intrinsic covariant acceleration and derives its orthogonality to the tangent for a unit-speed curve. Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry, Lecture 15, §15.1, Definition 15.1.1 and Example 15.1.3, lines 6271–6283 and 6309–6319, records the intrinsic geodesic equation and the tangential-projection description for an induced submanifold metric. These passages give context; the refutation below uses an explicit metric-coordinate calculation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A claimed identity between signed geodesic curvature and ordinary Euclidean curvature for every unit-speed curve on every oriented embedded Riemannian surface.
For a unit-speed curve on an oriented surface, its covariant acceleration satisfies and (Signed geodesic curvature).
In coordinates, the Levi–Civita symbols of a Riemannian metric are given by (Christoffel formula for the levi civita connection).
A smooth curve is an affinely parametrized geodesic when its covariant acceleration vanishes (Geodesic of an affine connection).
A Riemannian metric is positive definite at every point (Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold).
Refutation
Take the unit sphere with its induced round metric and outward orientation, and let for . Then has norm , while has norm and is normal to because . Thus the ordinary space-curve curvature is .
Around any point of the equator use a longitude-latitude chart on a longitude interval and . Differentiating gives , , and . Formula [F2] therefore yields and . The curve from step 1.1 has coordinates on this chart, so its coordinate second derivatives vanish and both components of its covariant acceleration are zero at . This calculation applies in a chart around every parameter value.
Hence everywhere, so [F3] identifies as an affinely parametrized geodesic. Its covariant acceleration is , and [F1] then gives . Together with step 1.1 this gives , so the proposed universal equality is false. The witness is a single explicit curve and uses no choice principle.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature (1997) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)