How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Abelian scheme torsion specialization is unramified
Statement
Assume AC and DC as inherited from the stated suppliers. Let be a discrete valuation ring with fraction field , residue field and strict henselization , let be an abelian scheme of relative dimension , and let be prime. Then for every :
(a) is finite etale over of rank ;
(b) over , specialization identifies the geometric generic points of with the special separable points, and the inertia group acts trivially on , hence on the Tate module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and DC, a DVR with fraction field , residue field and strict henselization , an abelian scheme of relative dimension , and a prime .
Multiplication by is finite flat of degree on an abelian scheme, and etale when is invertible on the base; properness and quasi-finiteness imply finiteness (Multiplication by n on an abelian scheme is finite flat, and etale for n invertible, A proper quasi-finite morphism is finite, Prime to characteristic multiplication is etale, Abelian schemes over a base).
The geometric torsion of the generic fibre is and the rank is locally constant (Field prime to characteristic torsion and Tate module).
Over a strictly henselian local ring with separably closed residue field, a finite etale scheme splits as a disjoint union of copies of the base, reduction is a bijection on sections, (Strict henselian etale sections). The chosen valuation determines and inertia (Prime-to-residue-characteristic Tate modules and inertia, Strict henselization of a DVR and smooth sections).
Proof
By [F1] the morphism is finite, flat and of degree , and since is invertible on it is etale; its kernel , the pullback along the identity section, is finite etale of rank by [F2] (the rank is locally constant and equals on the generic fibre of the connected base ). This proves (a).
Base change to : the scheme is finite etale over the strictly henselian local ring with separably closed residue field , so by [F3] it is a disjoint union of copies of ; in particular every geometric generic point is already rational over , and reduction is a bijection between the generic geometric points and the special separable points. Consequently fixes every point of , so the inertia group acts trivially; the same holds on the inverse limit , because inertia acts coordinatewise on the inverse limit and fixes every torsion coordinate. This is the precise finite-etale smooth-proper specialization statement used here; it is not general smooth proper base change for higher cohomology.
Remarks
For a nonhenselian DVR this proves triviality of the chosen inertia subgroup. Equivariance with the residue Galois group concerns the decomposition subgroup of the chosen valuation, not the full absolute Galois group of .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- A proper quasi-finite morphism is finite
- Prime-to-residue-characteristic Tate modules and inertia
- Strict henselization of a DVR and smooth sections
- Strict henselian etale sections
- Prime to characteristic multiplication is etale
- Field prime to characteristic torsion and Tate module
- Abelian schemes over a base
- Multiplication by n on an abelian scheme is finite flat, and etale for n invertible
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Bosch, W. Lutkebohmert, M. Raynaud, Neron Models (1990), 7.3/2 and 7.4 (torsion of abelian schemes and inertia) (standard reference, not scraped)