Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Abelian scheme torsion specialization is unramified

Statement

Assume AC and DC as inherited from the stated suppliers. Let R be a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K, residue field k and strict henselization Rsh, let A→Spec⁡R be an abelian scheme of relative dimension g, and let ℓ≠char⁡k be prime. Then for every ν≥1:

(a) A[ℓν] is finite etale over R of rank ℓ2gν;

(b) over Rsh, specialization identifies the geometric generic points of A[ℓν] with the special separable points, and the inertia group acts trivially on A[ℓν], hence on the Tate module.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and DC, a DVR R with fraction field K, residue field k and strict henselization Rsh, an abelian scheme A/R of relative dimension g, and a prime ℓ≠char⁡k.

[F1]

Multiplication by ℓν is finite flat of degree ℓ2gν on an abelian scheme, and etale when ℓν is invertible on the base; properness and quasi-finiteness imply finiteness (Multiplication by n on an abelian scheme is finite flat, and etale for n invertible, A proper quasi-finite morphism is finite, Prime to characteristic multiplication is etale, Abelian schemes over a base).

[F2]

The geometric torsion of the generic fibre is (Z/ℓν)2g and the rank is locally constant (Field prime to characteristic torsion and Tate module).

[F3]

Over a strictly henselian local ring with separably closed residue field, a finite etale scheme splits as a disjoint union of copies of the base, reduction is a bijection on sections, (Strict henselian etale sections). The chosen valuation determines Ksh⊆Ksep and inertia I=Gal⁡(Ksep/Ksh) (Prime-to-residue-characteristic Tate modules and inertia, Strict henselization of a DVR and smooth sections).

Proof

technique · direct: finiteness and etaleness of the torsion, then splitting over the strict henselization
1.1F1F2givenalgebra

By [F1] the morphism [ℓν]:A→A is finite, flat and of degree ℓ2gν, and since ℓ is invertible on R it is etale; its kernel A[ℓν], the pullback along the identity section, is finite etale of rank ℓ2gν by [F2] (the rank is locally constant and equals ℓ2gν on the generic fibre of the connected base Spec⁡R). This proves (a).

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra∎

Base change to Rsh: the scheme A[ℓν]Rsh is finite etale over the strictly henselian local ring Rsh with separably closed residue field ks, so by [F3] it is a disjoint union of copies of Spec⁡Rsh; in particular every geometric generic point is already rational over Ksh, and reduction is a bijection between the generic geometric points and the special separable points. Consequently Gal⁡(Ksep/Ksh) fixes every point of A[ℓν](Ksep), so the inertia group I=Gal⁡(Ksep/Ksh) acts trivially; the same holds on the inverse limit Tℓ(A), because inertia acts coordinatewise on the inverse limit and fixes every torsion coordinate. This is the precise finite-etale smooth-proper specialization statement used here; it is not general smooth proper base change for higher cohomology.

Remarks

For a nonhenselian DVR this proves triviality of the chosen inertia subgroup. Equivariance with the residue Galois group concerns the decomposition subgroup of the chosen valuation, not the full absolute Galois group of K.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources