How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Strict henselian etale sections
Statement
Assume AC and DC as inherited from the stated suppliers. Let be a strictly henselian local ring with separably closed residue field (Henselian pairs and Henselian local rings) and let be a separated etale finite-type -scheme. Then:
(a) reduction induces a bijection ;
(b) the union of the images of all -sections of is a finite etale -scheme isomorphic to a disjoint union of copies of , where ; it contains the whole closed fibre , and its complement has empty closed fibre and no -sections.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and DC, a strictly henselian local ring with separably closed residue field and maximal ideal , and a separated etale finite-type -scheme .
Etale morphisms are locally standard etale: locally on source and target, is with monic and invertible on the localization (Étale morphisms are locally standard étale, assuming AC).
Over a henselian local ring, a simple root of a monic polynomial lifts uniquely, and idempotents lift uniquely (A local ring is Henselian exactly when simple residue roots lift uniquely, Idempotents lift uniquely in a Henselian pair, both assuming AC); the strictly henselian property is the henselian pair condition of Henselian pairs and Henselian local rings used through these criteria.
Here strictly henselian means henselian local with separably closed residue field. No DVR hypothesis or construction as a strict henselization is required; the henselian condition is that of Henselian pairs and Henselian local rings.
Proof
Let and choose a standard etale chart localized at around as in [F1]. The image of the chart in is an open neighbourhood of the image point, which is the closed point of the local scheme ; hence it is all of . Write for the residue class of at ; it is a simple root of the monic polynomial because is invertible on the chart. By the simple-root lifting criterion [F2] there is a lift with and , so evaluation at defines an -section of the chart and hence of reducing to . Thus is surjective.
Two sections of with equal reduction have equalizer ; the diagonal of an etale morphism is an open immersion, so it is open, and separated over makes it closed, while it contains the closed point by hypothesis; since is connected (it is a local scheme), the equalizer is all of , so . Hence reduction is injective, and with step 1.1 it is bijective; this proves (a).
For a section , its image is open, being the base change of the etale diagonal, and closed because is a closed immersion as a section of the separated morphism . Two distinct sections have disjoint images: their equalizer is open and closed by the same argument as in step 2.1, and it is empty because it is a proper closed subset of the connected scheme (it misses the closed point since the sections have distinct reductions by the bijection of step 2.1). Hence the images of the sections, one for each point of the finite set , form disjoint open and closed subschemes each isomorphic to via .
Since is etale and finite type over the field , the closed fibre is a disjoint union of finitely many copies of (finite separable extensions of the separably closed field are trivial), so the closed fibre is covered by the closed points , and . Hence , the disjoint union of the section images, is finite etale over , and every section of meets and therefore lies in ; the complement has empty closed fibre and admits no -section. This proves (b).
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- A local ring is Henselian exactly when simple residue roots lift uniquely
- Idempotents lift uniquely in a Henselian pair
- Étale morphisms are locally standard étale
- Henselian pairs and Henselian local rings
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Bosch, W. Lutkebohmert, M. Raynaud, Neron Models (1990), 7.3/3 (sections of etale schemes over strictly henselian rings) (standard reference, not scraped)