Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strict henselian etale sections

Statement

Assume AC and DC as inherited from the stated suppliers. Let R be a strictly henselian local ring with separably closed residue field k (Henselian pairs and Henselian local rings) and let H be a separated etale finite-type R-scheme. Then:

(a) reduction induces a bijection H(R)→H(k);

(b) the union Hfin of the images of all R-sections of H is a finite etale R-scheme isomorphic to a disjoint union of d copies of Spec⁡R, where d=∣H(k)∣; it contains the whole closed fibre Hk, and its complement H∖Hfin has empty closed fibre and no R-sections.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and DC, a strictly henselian local ring R with separably closed residue field k and maximal ideal m, and a separated etale finite-type R-scheme H.

[F1]

Etale morphisms are locally standard etale: locally on source and target, H→Spec⁡R is Spec⁡(R[T]/(P))g with P monic and P′ invertible on the localization (Étale morphisms are locally standard étale, assuming AC).

[F2]

Over a henselian local ring, a simple root of a monic polynomial lifts uniquely, and idempotents lift uniquely (A local ring is Henselian exactly when simple residue roots lift uniquely, Idempotents lift uniquely in a Henselian pair, both assuming AC); the strictly henselian property is the henselian pair condition of Henselian pairs and Henselian local rings used through these criteria.

[F3]

Here strictly henselian means henselian local with separably closed residue field. No DVR hypothesis or construction as a strict henselization is required; the henselian condition is that of Henselian pairs and Henselian local rings.

Proof

technique · direct: lift points through standard etale charts, then count the disjoint section images via the etale diagonal
1.1F1F2F3givenconstruct

Let x∈H(k) and choose a standard etale chart R[T]/(P) localized at g around x as in [F1]. The image of the chart in Spec⁡R is an open neighbourhood of the image point, which is the closed point of the local scheme Spec⁡R; hence it is all of Spec⁡R. Write a for the residue class of T at x; it is a simple root of the monic polynomial P because P′ is invertible on the chart. By the simple-root lifting criterion [F2] there is a lift a∈R with P(a)=0 and g(a)∉m, so evaluation at a defines an R-section of the chart and hence of H reducing to x. Thus H(R)→H(k) is surjective.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Two sections s,t of H with equal reduction have equalizer Eq⁡(s,t)⊆Spec⁡R; the diagonal of an etale morphism is an open immersion, so it is open, and H separated over R makes it closed, while it contains the closed point by hypothesis; since Spec⁡R is connected (it is a local scheme), the equalizer is all of Spec⁡R, so s=t. Hence reduction H(R)→H(k) is injective, and with step 1.1 it is bijective; this proves (a).

3.1F2step 2.1construct

For a section s:Spec⁡R→H, its image is open, being the base change of the etale diagonal, and closed because s is a closed immersion as a section of the separated morphism H→Spec⁡R. Two distinct sections have disjoint images: their equalizer is open and closed by the same argument as in step 2.1, and it is empty because it is a proper closed subset of the connected scheme Spec⁡R (it misses the closed point since the sections have distinct reductions by the bijection of step 2.1). Hence the images of the d sections, one for each point of the finite set H(k), form d disjoint open and closed subschemes each isomorphic to Spec⁡R via s.

4.1F1F3step 3.1algebra∎

Since H is etale and finite type over the field k, the closed fibre Hk is a disjoint union of finitely many copies of Spec⁡k (finite separable extensions of the separably closed field k are trivial), so the closed fibre is covered by the closed points H(k), and Hk⊆Hfin. Hence Hfin, the disjoint union of the d section images, is finite etale over R, and every section of H meets Hk and therefore lies in Hfin; the complement H∖Hfin has empty closed fibre and admits no R-section. This proves (b).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources