Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Baire diagonal passage from finite regularity to smooth metrics

Statement

Assume dependent choice. Let M be a closed smooth finite-dimensional manifold and f:MR a fixed smooth Morse function. For a fixed pair p,q of its critical points, the smooth metrics for which its stable and unstable manifolds are transverse form a residual subset of the standard C metric space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Dependent choice, M,f,p,q as in the statement, and the finite-Ch universal projection, available at every sufficiently high finite regularity. Write G for the space of all smooth metrics.

[F2]

Sard--Smale makes its regular values residual at every sufficiently high finite regularity (Sard--Smale residual regular values for Fredholm maps).

[F4]

The fixed-metric trajectory operator is onto exactly when the stable and unstable manifolds are transverse (Morse--Smale transversality and surjectivity of the linearized flow operator).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

At a zero (g,γ) of the universal section, write its surjective linearization as L(δg,ξ)=A(δg)+Dγξ. Then the tangent space to the universal zero set is kerL, and the differential of its metric projection is (δg,ξ)δg. If Dγ is onto, this projection is onto by solving Dγξ=A(δg). Conversely, if the projection is onto, write any target vector as A(δg)+Dγξ using surjectivity of L, choose (δg,η)kerL, and subtract to obtain Dγ(ξη) equal to that target. Hence a metric is a regular value of the projection exactly when every corresponding Dγ is onto, which by [F4] is exactly the required stable--unstable transversality.

F1F4givenalgebra
1.2

If p=q, the stable and unstable tangent spaces at p are complementary eigenspaces of the hyperbolic gradient linearization; strict descent excludes any other intersection. If pq and f(p)f(q), strict descent makes the intersection empty. These cases hold for every metric. Hence suppose f(p)>f(q).

givenalgebra
1.3

Near each metric g choose compact local unstable and stable disks at p,q, with parametrizations depending continuously in C1 on g in a C2 neighbourhood U. Here is the parameter dependence needed: in coordinates near either zero fix its hyperbolic linearization L at g and write Xg(x)=Lx+Rg(x). After a cutoff on a sufficiently small ball, Rg has uniformly small Lipschitz constant. For prescribed small stable coordinate z, the integral equation x(t)=etLz+0te(ts)LPsRg(x(s))dste(ts)LPuRg(x(s))ds is a uniform contraction on a small exponentially weighted space of paths on [0,). Its fixed point and its derivative with respect to z depend continuously on g; the derivative solves a linear contraction equation. Evaluation at zero gives the stable disk. Reversing time gives the unstable disk. Restrict to smaller closed parameter balls so both disks extend beyond their boundaries. Finite-time flows also depend continuously in C1 on g.

givenalgebra
2.1

For integers j,k0, let TjkU require transversality of the disk maps ΦjgDgu(p) and ΦkgDgs(q) at every coincidence of points in their compact parameter domains. Tangent spaces here are those of the extended disks, including at boundary points. This is an open condition: if failing metrics converged in C2 to a metric satisfying it, compactness would give convergent coincidence parameters, and the closed rank-deficiency condition would contradict transversality at their limit. Every point of a global stable or unstable manifold eventually flows into the interior of the corresponding local disk. Thus all Tjk together are equivalent to the desired global transversality on U.

step 1.3algebra
3.1

Each TjkG is dense in UG. Indeed, start at any smooth g0 in a specified basic smooth neighbourhood controlling derivatives through order r. Choose finite Hmax{r,2} above the Sard--Smale threshold. Fix g0 on small disjoint critical neighbourhoods. Every trajectory between distinct critical points leaves their union, so metric variations outside them are the variations allowed in [F1]. By [F1], [F2], step 1.1 and Baire, there are arbitrarily CH-close metrics in this affine Banach parameter space for which the pair is transverse. Choose one, g1, still in U and within the prescribed derivative bounds; it satisfies Tjk.

F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1given
4.1

Approximate g1 by a smooth symmetric tensor using convolution in a finite coordinate cover and a smooth partition of unity. This converges in CH because H is finite and M is compact. Sufficiently close approximants remain positive definite, remain in the prescribed neighbourhood, and still satisfy Tjk by its C2 openness. Only this compact-disk condition needs to survive smoothing. Since g0 was arbitrary, this proves the claimed smooth density without fixing any common critical-neighbourhood data throughout U.

step 2.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

The smooth symmetric tensors on compact M form a separable complete metrizable space under their countable derivative seminorms; positivity is an open condition. Hence G is second countable and completely metrizable (an open subset admits an equivalent complete metric). Choose countably many neighbourhoods Ui as above and closed sets ViUiG whose interiors cover G. This is obtained by taking sufficiently small closed balls from a countable metric basis. For each i,j,k, set Oijk=(GVi)(Ti,jkG). These sets are open and dense by steps 2.1 and 4.1.

step 2.1step 4.1given
6.1

By [F3] and dependent choice, i,j,kOijk is dense and residual. Any metric in this intersection belongs to some Vi, hence satisfies every Ti,jk and therefore the global pair transversality by step 2.1. The complement of the desired set is consequently contained in a countable union of closed nowhere dense sets, so the desired set itself is residual. Together with step 1.2 this covers all ordered pairs.

F3step 1.2step 2.1step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources