How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The ball Poisson kernel is positive and has unit mass
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and . For every ball , interior point and boundary point , , and the kernel has total surface mass one: .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, an integer , a centre , a radius , an interior point and a boundary point .
For and the ball Poisson kernel is , the negative outward boundary-slot normal derivative of the ball Green function, and it is a continuous function of on (Poisson kernel of a Euclidean ball).
Let be a bounded domain carrying a Dirichlet Green function whose designated correctors satisfy ; let . Then for every real and every one has , both integrals absolutely finite; moreover on and for every (Green representation for classical Poisson data).
For the ball carries the Dirichlet Green function (with the centre case ), whose designated correctors all lie in , and whose negative outward boundary-slot normal derivative is the kernel of [F1] (Dirichlet Green function of a Euclidean ball, Poisson kernel of a Euclidean ball).
is a bounded domain (Euclidean balls are bounded C-one domains with radial outward normal).
For and the sphere and ball measures are and , both finite and positive (Sphere and ball measures scale in Rn).
Countable Choice is the standing hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Work under [F6] and let . The hypotheses of [F2] are met: is a bounded domain by [F4], and by [F3] it carries a Dirichlet Green function whose designated correctors lie in ; moreover the kernel of [F1] is by [F3] the negative boundary-slot normal derivative of that Green function, so the two notation systems denote the same function on .
Strict positivity. By [F1], . Since lies in the open ball, and the numerator is positive; by [F5] both and , and because an interior point and a boundary point of cannot coincide. A quotient of positive numbers is positive, so .
Unit mass. Apply the representation identity of [F2] on to the constant function , which is real and lies in with : for every , . Step 1.1 identifies with , and [F2] guarantees that the second integral is absolutely finite, so .
Step 2.1 gives for every interior and boundary , and step 2.2 gives unit total surface mass for every ; this proves both assertions of the statement. The argument uses the Green representation formula rather than the ball Dirichlet theorem, so the boundary-convergence question is not presupposed.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
62 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas Schmidt, Partial Differential Equations I (2026) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Armin Schikorra, Partial Differential Equations I & II (2025) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sung-Jin Oh, Lecture Notes for Math 222A: Partial Differential Equations (2023) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2025 archived author manuscript) (standard reference, not scraped)