Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A framed cobordism of regular preimages produces a homotopy

Statement

Assume ACω. Let M be a closed smooth m-manifold, m≥1, and let f,g:M→Sm be smooth. Suppose y,y′∈Sm are regular values with positive bases b,b′ and the framed regular preimages (f−1(y),f∗b) and (g−1(y′),g∗b′) are framed cobordant in M. Then f and g are smoothly homotopic, hence homotopic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed smooth m-manifold M, smooth maps f,g:M→Sm, regular values y,y′ with positive bases b,b′, and a framed cobordism between the framed preimages (f−1(y),f∗b) and (g−1(y′),g∗b′) (Framed regular preimages of a map to a sphere, Framed cobordism of framed submanifolds, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

For a smooth map h:M→Sm, a regular value z with positive basis c and the framed preimage (h−1(z),h∗c), the Pontryagin-Thom map f(h−1(z),h∗c):M→Sm of that framed submanifold is homotopic to h (The Pontryagin-Thom map of a framed submanifold, The collapse of a regular preimage is homotopic to the original map).

[F2]

Framed cobordant closed framed codimension-m submanifolds of the closed manifold M have homotopic Pontryagin-Thom maps M→Sm; a framed cobordism supplies an explicit homotopy of the based maps (Framed cobordant submanifolds have homotopic Pontryagin-Thom maps, The Pontryagin-Thom map of a framed submanifold).

[F3]

Continuous homotopies concatenate and reverse. Under ACω, continuously homotopic smooth maps are smoothly homotopic (Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints, Continuously homotopic smooth maps are smoothly homotopic).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

Write f0:=f(f−1(y),f∗b) and g0:=f(g−1(y′),g∗b′) for the Pontryagin-Thom maps of the two framed preimages. By [F1], applied to h=f,z=y,c=b and to h=g,z=y′,c=b′, there are continuous homotopies from f to f0 and from g to g0, so it suffices to connect f0 and g0.

1.2F2given

The hypothesis that the two framed preimages are framed cobordant in M, together with [F2], gives a homotopy from f0 to g0, in fact an explicit one induced by the cobordism.

2.1F3step 1.1step 1.2∎

Concatenate the homotopy f≃f0, the homotopy f0≃g0, and the reversal of g≃g0. This gives a continuous homotopy f≃g by [F3]. Since the endpoint maps f,g are smooth, the smoothing theorem in [F3] then supplies a smooth homotopy with these endpoints. It is not necessary that the middle collapse homotopy be smooth.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources