How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The collapse of a regular preimage is homotopic to the original map
Statement
Assume , let be closed and smooth and let . If is smooth, is regular and is a positive basis at , then the Pontryagin–Thom map of is smoothly homotopic to .
When and are the fixed centre and basis of The Pontryagin-Thom map of a framed submanifold, the homotopy has the following local form. There are a compact tube and a smooth equal to outside and to the normalized collapse near ; is supported in , and is constant near . This local assertion requires the displayed target normalization.
More generally, if is continuous and smooth on a neighbourhood of , with surjective derivative there, the same collapse-class conclusion holds under continuous homotopy.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: as in the statement, with and .
The normalized collapse has centre fibre and exactly the framing ; in framing coordinates its target coordinate is near zero (The Pontryagin-Thom map of a framed submanifold, The regular preimage of the collapse recovers the original framed submanifold).
Compatible tubes exist and a framing supplies product fibre coordinates (The tubular neighbourhood theorem in a smooth ambient manifold, Framings of a normal bundle). The differential defining the preimage framing is Framed regular preimages of a map to a sphere; the local-smooth transverse-preimage version, including closedness of the fibre, is Transverse preimages carry the pulled-back normal structure.
Smooth maps paste over an open cover (Smooth maps paste over an open cover). Smooth cutoffs and endpoint-flat time reparametrizations are supplied by The standard smooth step function.
Positive bases give framed-cobordant preimages for (The framed preimage class is independent of regular value and positive basis); framed cobordisms give homotopic collapses (Framed cobordant submanifolds have homotopic Pontryagin-Thom maps). Continuously homotopic smooth maps are smoothly homotopic under countable choice (Continuously homotopic smooth maps are smoothly homotopic).
Proof
First suppose , . Shrink a framed tube so both maps lie in the centre coordinate chart there; use as the fibre coordinate. In these coordinates and , with on a sufficiently small tube by [F1]. A finite cover of compact bounds the second fibre derivatives of ; integrating the derivative along each fibre segment gives uniformly. Choose small enough that , the estimates hold for , and there. Thus for , and . This uses framing coordinates, not a false positivity inference about an arbitrary invertible matrix.
Let be a smooth cutoff equal to one for and zero for . In the target centre chart put and use elsewhere. On the support both vectors have positive dot product with when , so no extra centre preimage is created. The family equals on a neighbourhood of the tube boundary, hence pastes smoothly. Its final map agrees with on and with outside a compact tube .
On , both and avoid . In stereographic coordinates interpolate linearly to . On use the constant family . These formulas agree on , so they paste to a smooth homotopy constant near . Endpoint-flat reparametrization makes its concatenation with step 2.1 smooth. If , take and simply interpolate the two maps in the chart avoiding .
For general , choose a rotation joined smoothly to the identity with ; the usual plane rotation handles nonantipodal points, the identity handles equality, and a rotation handles antipodes. Put . Its fibre at is , and the pushed basis induces exactly . By [F4], changing that positive basis to gives a framed cobordism from to the framed preimage of . Their collapses are homotopic. Steps 1.1–3.1 compare to the collapse of , while the rotation path compares to . The concatenation proves the claimed homotopy; [F4] makes it smooth.
If is only continuous away from its regular fibre, the local deformation of steps 1.1–2.1 is still smooth on a small tube and continuous elsewhere, and the chart interpolation of step 3.1 is continuous. For step 4.1, basis independence is the explicit framed cylinder using a path of positive bases, which requires only the local differential on the fibre. The same constructions therefore give a continuous homotopy to the collapse. The regular fibre is compact because it is closed in . All choice is inherited from the stated suppliers.
Depends on
- Transverse preimages carry the pulled-back normal structure
- Continuously homotopic smooth maps are smoothly homotopic
- Framed cobordant submanifolds have homotopic Pontryagin-Thom maps
- The framed preimage class is independent of regular value and positive basis
- The standard smooth step function
- Framings of a normal bundle
- The Pontryagin-Thom map of a framed submanifold
- Framed regular preimages of a map to a sphere
- The regular preimage of the collapse recovers the original framed submanifold
- The tubular neighbourhood theorem in a smooth ambient manifold
- Smooth maps paste over an open cover
- The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps
- Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints
Used by
- A framing, not just the submanifold, determines the Pontryagin-Thom class Counterexample
- The framed unknot represents a generator of pi₃ of S² Example
- A framed cobordism of regular preimages produces a homotopy Lemma
- Stabilizing a framed submanifold suspends its Pontryagin-Thom map Lemma
- The Pontryagin-Thom correspondence in fixed codimension Theorem
- The stable Pontryagin-Thom theorem identifies framed bordism with stable stems Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Milnor, Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniel S. Freed, Bordism: Old and New (lecture notes, UT Austin, Fall 2012) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Milnor and James Munkres, Differential Topology (Prentice-Hall, 1974) (standard reference, not scraped)