Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The collapse of a regular preimage is homotopic to the original map

Statement

Assume ACω, let X be closed and smooth and let k≥1. If f:X→Sk is smooth, y is regular and b is a positive basis at y, then the Pontryagin–Thom map of (f−1(y),f∗b) is smoothly homotopic to f.

When y=y0 and b=b0 are the fixed centre and basis of The Pontryagin-Thom map of a framed submanifold, the homotopy has the following local form. There are a compact tube U and a smooth f1 equal to f outside U and to the normalized collapse g near N=f−1(y0); f≃f1 is supported in U, and f1≃g is constant near N. This local assertion requires the displayed target normalization.

More generally, if f is continuous and smooth on a neighbourhood of f−1(y), with surjective derivative there, the same collapse-class conclusion holds under continuous homotopy.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f,y,b as in the statement, with N=f−1(y) and φ=f∗b.

[F1]

The normalized collapse g has centre fibre N and exactly the framing φ; in framing coordinates u its target coordinate is u near zero (The Pontryagin-Thom map of a framed submanifold, The regular preimage of the collapse recovers the original framed submanifold).

[F2]

Compatible tubes exist and a framing supplies product fibre coordinates (The tubular neighbourhood theorem in a smooth ambient manifold, Framings of a normal bundle). The differential defining the preimage framing is Framed regular preimages of a map to a sphere; the local-smooth transverse-preimage version, including closedness of the fibre, is Transverse preimages carry the pulled-back normal structure.

[F3]

Smooth maps paste over an open cover (Smooth maps paste over an open cover). Smooth cutoffs and endpoint-flat time reparametrizations are supplied by The standard smooth step function.

[F4]

Positive bases give framed-cobordant preimages for k≥1 (The framed preimage class is independent of regular value and positive basis); framed cobordisms give homotopic collapses (Framed cobordant submanifolds have homotopic Pontryagin-Thom maps). Continuously homotopic smooth maps are smoothly homotopic under countable choice (Continuously homotopic smooth maps are smoothly homotopic).

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

First suppose y=y0, b=b0. Shrink a framed tube so both maps lie in the centre coordinate chart there; use u=φs(v) as the fibre coordinate. In these coordinates F(s,0)=G(s,0)=0 and DuF(s,0)=DuG(s,0)=I, with G(s,u)=u on a sufficiently small tube by [F1]. A finite cover of compact N bounds the second fibre derivatives of F; integrating the derivative along each fibre segment gives ∣F(s,u)−u∣≤C∣u∣2 uniformly. Choose c>0 small enough that Cc<1/2, the estimates hold for ∣u∣≤c, and G(s,u)=u there. Thus for 0<∣u∣≤c, F(s,u)⋅u≥∣u∣2−C∣u∣3>0 and G(s,u)⋅u=∣u∣2>0. This uses framing coordinates, not a false positivity inference about an arbitrary invertible matrix.

2.1F3step 1.1construct

Let λ(∣u∣2) be a smooth cutoff equal to one for ∣u∣≤c/2 and zero for ∣u∣≥c. In the target centre chart put Ft=(1−tλ)F+tλG and use f elsewhere. On the support both vectors have positive dot product with u when u≠0, so no extra centre preimage is created. The family equals f on a neighbourhood of the tube boundary, hence pastes smoothly. Its final map f1 agrees with g on V={∣u∣<c/2} and with f outside a compact tube U.

3.1F3step 2.1construct

On X∖N, both f1 and g avoid y0. In stereographic coordinates h:Sk∖{y0}→Rk interpolate h(f1) linearly to h(g). On V use the constant family f1=g. These formulas agree on V∖N, so they paste to a smooth homotopy constant near N. Endpoint-flat reparametrization makes its concatenation with step 2.1 smooth. If N=∅, take U=V=∅ and simply interpolate the two maps in the chart avoiding y0.

4.1F4step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1construct

For general y,b, choose a rotation R joined smoothly to the identity with R(y)=y0; the usual plane rotation handles nonantipodal points, the identity handles equality, and a π rotation handles antipodes. Put f′=Rf. Its fibre at y0 is N, and the pushed basis dRyb induces exactly φ. By [F4], changing that positive basis to b0 gives a framed cobordism from (N,φ) to the framed preimage (N,φ′) of (f′,y0,b0). Their collapses are homotopic. Steps 1.1–3.1 compare f′ to the collapse of (N,φ′), while the rotation path compares f to f′. The concatenation proves the claimed homotopy; [F4] makes it smooth.

5.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

If f is only continuous away from its regular fibre, the local deformation of steps 1.1–2.1 is still smooth on a small tube and continuous elsewhere, and the chart interpolation of step 3.1 is continuous. For step 4.1, basis independence is the explicit framed cylinder using a path of positive bases, which requires only the local differential on the fibre. The same constructions therefore give a continuous homotopy to the collapse. The regular fibre is compact because it is closed in X. All choice is inherited from the stated suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources