Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The framed preimage class is independent of regular value and positive basis

Statement

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let X be a closed smooth manifold and let f:X→Sk be smooth, with k≥1.

(i) At a regular value y of f, two positive bases b,b′ of TySk give framed-cobordant framed preimages (f−1(y),f∗b) and (f−1(y),f∗b′).

(ii) If y,y′ are regular values of f with positive bases b,b′, then the framed preimages (f−1(y),f∗b) and (f−1(y′),f∗b′) are framed cobordant (Framed regular preimages of a map to a sphere, Framed cobordism of framed submanifolds).

Consequently the framed cobordism class of a regular preimage depends only on the smooth homotopy class of f: smoothly homotopic maps have framed-cobordant preimages for any choices of regular values and positive bases.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed smooth manifold X, a smooth map f:X→Sk, regular values and positive bases as in (i) and (ii), and the Pontryagin manifolds (f−1(y),f∗b) of Framed regular preimages of a map to a sphere.

[F1]

Any two positive bases of an oriented vector space are joined by a smooth path of positive bases (Positively oriented bases of an oriented vector space are path-connected).

[F2]

The cylinder N×I⊆X×I with a framing that is the pullback of f∗b near t=0 and of f∗b′ near t=1 is a framed cobordism from (N,f∗b) to (N,f∗b′) (Framed cobordism of framed submanifolds); the standard smooth step function smooths the two junctions obtained by concatenating the constant path at b, a path of positive bases and the constant path at b′, so a smooth path of positive bases can be reparametrised to be constant near t=0 and t=1 (The standard smooth step function).

[F3]

If f0,f1:X→Sk are smoothly homotopic and y is a regular value of both with fixed positive basis b, then the framed preimages are framed cobordant (Homotopic maps with a common regular value have framed-cobordant preimages).

[F4]

Framed cobordism is an equivalence relation, so framed cobordisms can be concatenated (Framed cobordism is an equivalence relation).

[F5]

Rotations of Rk+1 have determinant one and form a group; the rotations in a coordinate plane give explicit smooth one-parameter families (Orthogonal and unitary operators form groups, and their determinants have modulus one).

[F6]

Two smooth maps f0,f1:X→Sk, k≥1, have a common regular value: their critical sets are closed by the local rank-minor condition and compact because X is compact; their critical-value images are therefore closed and null by Sard. Each regular-value set is consequently open and dense, and the intersection of these two open dense sets is nonempty (Morse-Sard for smooth manifolds, Regular values form a dense Gδ set).

Proof

1.1F1F2given

(Basis independence (i).) Let N=f−1(y) and let b,b′ be positive bases of TySk. The change-of-basis matrix carries b to b′ and has positive determinant, so [F1] gives a smooth path bt, t∈[0,1], of positive bases with b0=b, b1=b′; by the reparametrisation recorded in [F2] we may take bt smooth and constant near t=0 and t=1. On N×I⊆X×I the normal bundle is canonically pr⁡N∗ν(N⊆X), and the formula Ψ(x,t):=f∗bt(x) defines a smooth bundle isomorphism ν(N×I⊆X×I)→N×I×Rk which over the end collar t∈[0,ε) equals the pullback of f∗b and over t∈(1−ε,1] the pullback of f∗b′. Hence (N×I,ε,Ψ) is a framed cobordism from (N,f∗b) to (N,f∗b′) by [F2].

1.2F5given

(A rotation family and a homotopy.) Let y,y′∈Sk be regular values of f and choose an orthonormal pair u,v in Rk+1 spanning a plane containing y when y′=−y; when y′=y take the constant identity family; otherwise there is an explicit rotation R1, identity on the orthogonal complement of a two-plane and equal to a plane rotation there, with R1(y)=y′: rotate in the plane span⁡{y,y′} if y′≠±y, and by angle π in a plane containing y if y′=−y. Let Rt be the corresponding family of rotations through angle tθ, so that t↦Rt is smooth, R0=id, R1(y)=y′, and each Rt has determinant one by [F5]. Put F(x,t):=Rt(f(x)); this is a smooth homotopy from f0:=f to f1:=R1∘f. The value y′ is a regular value of f0=f by hypothesis, and of f1 because f1−1(y′)=f−1(R1−1y′)=f−1(y) and df1=dR1∘df is surjective there.

2.1F3step 1.2

(The cobordism from the homotopy.) Apply [F3] to the smooth homotopy F from f to R1∘f and the common regular value y′ with the positive basis b′: the framed preimages (f−1(y′),f∗b′) and ((R1f)−1(y′),(R1f)∗b′) are framed cobordant. The second preimage is f−1(y); and since dR1 is invertible and orientation-preserving, the basis b′′:=dR1−1(b′) is positive at y and (R1f)∗b′=f∗b′′ by the chain rule: the framing of the preimage of a composition is the framing of the inner map read through the invertible differential. Hence (f−1(y′),f∗b′) is framed cobordant to (f−1(y),f∗b′′).

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1

(Independence of the regular value (ii).) By step 1.1 applied to the regular value y of f and the two positive bases b′′ and b, the framed preimages (f−1(y),f∗b′′) and (f−1(y),f∗b) are framed cobordant. Concatenating this cobordism with the one of step 2.1 by [F4] gives a framed cobordism from (f−1(y′),f∗b′) to (f−1(y),f∗b), which is (ii).

4.1F3F4F6step 1.1step 3.1

(Consequence for smooth homotopies.) Let f0,f1:X→Sk be smoothly homotopic via F, and let yi be regular values of fi with positive bases bi, i=0,1. By [F6] choose a common regular value p of f0 and f1; choose any positive basis c of TpSk. Applying [F3] to the homotopy F and the common regular value p gives a framed cobordism between (f0−1(p),f0∗c) and (f1−1(p),f1∗c); applying (ii) of step 3.1 to f0 gives one between (f0−1(y0),f0∗b0) and (f0−1(p),f0∗c), and applying it to f1 gives one between (f1−1(y1),f1∗b1) and (f1−1(p),f1∗c). Concatenating the three framed cobordisms by [F4] gives a framed cobordism between (f0−1(y0),f0∗b0) and (f1−1(y1),f1∗b1), as asserted.

5.1F1F2F3F4F6step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

(Conclusion.) Steps 1.1 and 3.1 prove (i) and (ii); step 4.1 proves that smoothly homotopic maps with any choices of regular values and positive bases have framed-cobordant preimages, so the framed cobordism class of a regular preimage depends only on the smooth homotopy class of the map. Empty preimages are included. The hypothesis k≥1 is essential: for a constant map X→S0, the two regular-value preimages are X and ∅, which need not be framed cobordant. Only ACω, inherited from the cited suppliers, is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources