Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Framed cobordism is an equivalence relation

Statement

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). For every closed smooth manifold X and every k≥0, framed cobordism of closed framed codimension-k submanifolds of X (Framed cobordism of framed submanifolds) is an equivalence relation.

Reflexivity is realised by the cylinder N×I⊆X×I together with the pullback of φ along pr⁡N; symmetry is realised by the reflection ρ(x,t)=(x,1−t) of X×I with the framing transported across dρ; transitivity is realised by gluing two framed cobordisms along their common product end, the framings agreeing on the whole overlap collar.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed smooth manifold X, an integer k≥0, and the definition of a framed cobordism (W,ε,Ψ) from (N0,φ0) to (N1,φ1).

[F1]

A framed cobordism consists of a compact neat embedded submanifold W⊆X×I with ∂W=N0×{0}⊔N1×{1}, product ends W∩(X×[0,ε))=N0×[0,ε) and W∩(X×(1−ε,1])=N1×(1−ε,1], and a framing Ψ:ν(W⊆X×I)→W×Rk that on each end collar is the pullback of φi under the canonical identification ν(W)∣Ni×Θi≅pr⁡∗ν(Ni⊆X) (Framed cobordism of framed submanifolds, Framings of a normal bundle, Neat submanifolds of a manifold with boundary).

[F2]

If N⊆X is a closed embedded submanifold then N×I⊆X×I is a closed embedded submanifold for the product smooth structures, and the product structure identifies ν(N×I⊆X×I) with pr⁡N∗ν(N⊆X) because the I-direction is tangent to N×I (Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts).

[F3]

The maps ρ(x,t)=(x,1−t) of X×I to itself, σ1(x,t)=(x,t/2) of X×I onto X×[0,12] and σ2(x,t)=(x,(t+1)/2) of X×I onto X×[12,1] are diffeomorphisms, and a diffeomorphism carries neat embedded submanifolds onto neat embedded submanifolds; its differential, by the chain rule, intertwines tangent and normal quotients and preserves the product splittings T(X×I)=TX⊕TI (Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds, The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps).

[F5]

An equivalence relation on a set is a reflexive, symmetric and transitive relation (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set A/∼).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4construct

(Reflexivity.) Let (N,φ) be a closed framed codimension-k submanifold of X. Put W:=N×I⊆X×I and ε:=14. By [F2] and [F4], W is a compact embedded submanifold; its boundary in X×I is N×{0}⊔N×{1}=∂W, and W is transverse to ∂(X×I)=X×{0,1} because TW contains the I-direction, so W is neat. Its ends are the literal products N×[0,14) and N×(34,1]. By [F2] the normal bundle ν(W⊆X×I) is canonically pr⁡N∗ν(N⊆X); let Ψ be the pullback of φ along pr⁡N under this identification. Then Ψ is a smooth bundle isomorphism and over each end collar it is the pullback of φ, so (W,14,Ψ) is a framed cobordism from (N,φ) to (N,φ).

1.2F1F3construct

(Symmetry.) Let (W,ε,Ψ) be a framed cobordism from (N0,φ0) to (N1,φ1). Put ρ(x,t):=(x,1−t) and W′:=ρ(W). By [F3] W′ is a compact neat embedded submanifold of X×I with ∂W′=N1×{0}⊔N0×{1}, and its ends are the literal products ρ(N1×(1−ε,1])=N1×[0,ε) and ρ(N0×[0,ε))=N0×(1−ε,1]. The differential dρ is the identity on the TX factor and multiplication by −1 on the TI factor; along an end collar the I-direction is tangent to W and to W′, so dρ induces, over ρ, the identity map ν(Ni⊆X)→ν(Ni⊆X) of the canonical product identifications. Define Ψ′ over W′ by Ψρ(p)′:=Ψp∘(dρp‾)−1, where dρp‾:ν(W)p→ν(W′)ρ(p) is the quotient isomorphism induced by dρp. Then Ψ′ is a smooth bundle isomorphism ν(W′⊆X×I)→W′×Rk which on the collar N1×[0,ε) is the pullback of φ1 and on N0×(1−ε,1] the pullback of φ0. Hence (W′,ε,Ψ′) is a framed cobordism from (N1,φ1) to (N0,φ0).

1.3F1F3construct

(Transitivity, construction.) Let (W1,ε1,Ψ1) be a framed cobordism from (N0,φ0) to (N1,φ1) and (W2,ε2,Ψ2) one from (N1,φ1) to (N2,φ2). Put ε:=min⁡(ε1,ε2), define σ1(x,t):=(x,t/2) and σ2(x,t):=(x,(t+1)/2), and set W1∗:=σ1(W1)⊆X×[0,12], W2∗:=σ2(W2)⊆X×[12,1] and W:=W1∗∪W2∗. By [F3] each Wi∗ is a compact neat embedded submanifold, with ∂W1∗=N0×{0}⊔N1×{12} and ∂W2∗=N1×{12}⊔N2×{1}.

2.1F1F3step 1.2step 1.3

(Transitivity: W is a neat submanifold carrying a framing.) Near t=12 one has W1∗∩(X×(12−ε2,12])=N1×(12−ε2,12] and W2∗∩(X×[12,12+ε2))=N1×[12,12+ε2), so W∩(X×(12−ε2,12+ε2))=N1×(12−ε2,12+ε2) is a product piece. Every point of W with t≠12 lies in W1∗∩(X×[0,12)) or in W2∗∩(X×(12,1]), which are open pieces of the smooth submanifolds Wi∗; those two pieces and the product piece cover W, and on their overlaps (subsets of the product piece) the three descriptions agree. Hence W is a compact neat embedded submanifold of X×I with ∂W=N0×{0}⊔N2×{1} and with the literal product ends N0×[0,ε2) and N2×(1−ε2,1]. [F1, F3, step 1.3] Transport Ψ1 across σ1 and Ψ2 across σ2 as in step 1.2. Since σi preserves the splitting T(X×I)=TX⊕TI up to a positive scale in TI, the transported framings are smooth bundle isomorphisms ν(Wi∗⊆X×I)→Wi∗×Rk, the first equal to the pullback of φ1 on the collar N1×(12−ε2,12] and the second equal to the pullback of φ1 on N1×[12,12+ε2). These two collars cover the overlap region just described, where both transported framings are the pullback of φ1 under the canonical identification ν(W)∣N1×Θ≅pr⁡∗ν(N1⊆X); away from the overlap each is smooth. Hence they define one smooth bundle isomorphism Ψ:ν(W⊆X×I)→W×Rk, which on the outer ends is the pullback of φ0 and of φ2. Therefore (W,ε2,Ψ) is a framed cobordism from (N0,φ0) to (N2,φ2).

3.1F1F5step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

(Conclusion.) Steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 exhibit reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity of framed cobordism for arbitrary closed X, k≥0 and framed submanifolds, including the empty manifold and the rank-zero case k=0, where all framings are unique. By [F5] framed cobordism is an equivalence relation. No orientation, no metric and no choice beyond the inherited ACω is used: all constructions are explicit, and the only choice-dependent input is the smooth normal-bundle structure of [F1].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

89 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources