How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cantor and Baire sequence spaces and coordinate codings
Statement
In ZF, and are Polish under the metric and when is the first coordinate at which and differ. Cantor space is compact and has no isolated points. Coordinate pairing gives homeomorphisms and . The map
is a homeomorphism of onto , and is at most countable.
Facts & Assumptions
Cantor sequence space fixes the binary cylinder topology, inherited from Baire space.
Metric axioms are in Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric, and Polish spaces are separable completely metrizable spaces means separable and completely metrizable.
Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right requires a finite subcover of every open cover.
The open-neighbourhood criterion for continuity is in Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally.
Proof
Given: The two fixed sequence spaces and their cylinder topologies. No choice principle is assumed.
Symmetry and separation of follow from the first differing coordinate. If and both agree through the first coordinates, so do . Consequently , proving the metric law. For , , so the metric induces precisely the cylinders. A Cauchy sequence has each coordinate eventually constant: use the Cauchy bound for coordinate . Define to be that unique eventual value. The Cauchy bound at shows all sufficiently late terms agree with on the first coordinates, hence converge to . In the binary case each value remains binary.
Let be an open cover of . If no finite subfamily covers it, the root cylinder is not finitely covered. Whenever is not finitely covered, at least one of is not finitely covered: otherwise combine their two finite covers. Recursively take the least such bit. The resulting lies in some , and openness gives for some , contradicting the construction. Hence every cover has a finite subcover, as F3 requires. Only least choices from two bits were used.
The displayed pairing is a bijection : on diagonal its values are the consecutive integers from to , and the diagonals partition . Define . Its inverse assigns , so both compositions are identities coordinate by coordinate. A finite restriction on either side constrains finitely many coordinates on the other; at each point a long enough initial cylinder fixes all those coordinates. Thus both directions are continuous by F4, in the binary case as well.
Each block in ends in and has positive length, so . Conversely for , let be the position of its th , indexed starting at zero, obtained by successive least search. Put and . These are natural numbers and the block concatenation reconstructs . Reading block lengths from returns , giving a two-sided inverse. Fixing enough input coordinates to finish the first output bits proves continuity of ; fixing through the th separator proves continuity of its inverse on .
Finite words admit an explicit natural-number coding: encode a finite word by its length and recursively pair its entries, using . Appending infinitely many zeros gives a countable family meeting every cylinder in either space. Thus they are separable; combined with step 1.1 this proves Polishness. Given any binary cylinder containing , change the next unrestricted bit of and keep all other bits. The resulting different point is in the same cylinder, so no point is isolated.
If , it has only finitely many s. Associate the integer . Distinct finite binary supports give distinct sums: at their largest differing index , the term exceeds the sum . Thus is an injection into , with the zero sequence mapped to zero. This proves the countability assertion and completes all constructions. QED.
Depends on
- Cantor sequence space
- Polish spaces are separable completely metrizable spaces
- Metric space: $d(x,y) = 0$ iff $x = y$, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally
Used by
- The Polish space of trees and its well-founded rank Definition
- Analytic countable operations and inclusion of Borel sets Lemma
- Closed subspaces, products, and Baire parametrization Lemma
- Coding strategies and their compatible plays Lemma
- Continuous injections of sequence spaces into the real line Lemma
- Dyadic coding supplies coin measure and its completed Lebesgue transfer Lemma
- Perfect-set game strategy dichotomy on Cantor space Lemma
- AD gives the perfect-set property in sequence spaces and the real line Theorem
- Uncountable analytic sets contain compact Cantor copies Theorem
- Universal Borel sets and strictness on Cantor space Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.