Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Capped DIIS coefficients have a unique minimum-norm least-squares selection

Statement

Let s≥1, let R1,…,Rs be complex matrices of one fixed shape, and let C≥1. Define Cs,C:={c∈Rs:∑i=1sci=1, ∑i=1s∣ci∣≤C} and J(c):=∥∑i=1sciRi∥F2. Then J attains a minimum on Cs,C. Among all minimizers there is a unique vector of minimum Euclidean norm. This rule defines the exact capped DIIS coefficient vector even when the least-squares Gram matrix is singular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A positive integer s, matrices Ri of the same finite shape, and a real cap C≥1.

[F3]

Real absolute values satisfy ∣a+b∣≤∣a∣+∣b∣ and ∣ab∣=∣a∣∣b∣ (The triangle inequality, Basic properties of the absolute value).

Proof

1.1givenF2F3

The vector e1=(1,0,…,0) belongs to Cs,C because its entries sum to 1 and its ℓ1 norm is 1≤C. Thus the coefficient set is nonempty. For c,d∈Rs, each ∣ci−di∣≤∥c−d∥2, and [F3] gives ∣∣ci∣−∣di∣∣≤∣ci−di∣; hence both c↦∑ici and c↦∑i∣ci∣ are continuous. Their closed level sets show that Cs,C is closed. It is bounded because ∥c∥12=∑ici2+2∑i<j∣ci∣∣cj∣≥∥c∥22 and ∥c∥1≤C. Therefore [F2] makes Cs,C compact.

2.1step 1.1F1F2

Put T(c)=∑iciRi. By the triangle inequality and homogeneity of the Frobenius norm, ∥T(c)−T(d)∥F≤∑i∣ci−di∣∥Ri∥F≤∥c−d∥2∑i∥Ri∥F, so T is continuous; the reverse triangle inequality then makes c↦J(c)=∥T(c)∥F2 continuous. By [F2], J attains a minimum m on the nonempty compact set Cs,C. The set M=Cs,C∩J−1({m}) is closed and bounded in Rs, hence compact by [F2], and it is nonempty by attainment.

3.1step 2.1F1F3algebra

For c,d∈Cs,C and 0≤t≤1, the coefficients e=(1−t)c+td satisfy ∑iei=(1−t)∑ici+t∑idi=1. By [F3], ∑i∣ei∣≤(1−t)∑i∣ci∣+t∑i∣di∣≤C, so Cs,C is convex. Expanding each complex matrix entry gives ∥(1−t)A+tB∥F2=(1−t)∥A∥F2+t∥B∥F2−t(1−t)∥A−B∥F2 for real t. Applying this identity to A=T(c) and B=T(d) shows J((1−t)c+td)≤(1−t)J(c)+tJ(d)=m when c,d∈M; since the combination is feasible and m is the minimum, it also lies in M. Thus M is convex. The function c↦∥c∥22=∑ici2 is continuous, so compactness of M gives a minimizer c∗∈M.

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

If distinct c,d∈M both had minimum Euclidean norm, their midpoint would lie in M and satisfy ∥c+d2∥22=∥c∥22+∥d∥222−∥c−d∥224<∥c∥22+∥d∥222, contradicting minimality. Thus c∗ is the unique minimum-norm least-squares minimizer. No nonsingularity of the Gram matrix is needed for existence or tie-breaking.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources