Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cesaro limit of truncated means

Statement

For identically distributed integrable real (Xn), with Yk=Xk1{Xkk}, one has n1k=1nEYkEX1.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Change of variables for expectation: Let X:(Ω,F,P)(S,Σ) be a random element, let PX be its law, and let g:(S,Σ)R or g:(S,Σ)C be measurable.

  1. If g0, then E[g(X)]=SgdPX.
  2. If g(X) is integrable, then g is integrable with respect to PX and the same formula holds: E[g(X)]=SgdPX.
[F2]

Dominated convergence: Let f and (fn) be measurable complex-valued functions such that fnf almost everywhere and fng almost everywhere for a single nonnegative measurable function g with gdμ<+. Then fL1(μ), fnfdμ0, and hence fndμfdμ.

[F3]

If xkL then σnL: convergence implies (C,1)-summability to the same value: Let (xk) be a sequence of reals that converges (def-sequence, def-real-limit), and let (σn) be its sequence of Cesaro means (def-cesaro-mean). Then (σn) converges as well, and

limnσn  =  limkxk.

Both limits are asserted to exist: the right-hand one by hypothesis, the left-hand one as part of the conclusion. Equivalently: a convergent sequence is (C,1)-summable, to its own limit. The notation is licensed by uniqueness of limits of real sequences (lem-limit-unique).

The converse is false (fs-cesaro-converse).

Proof

Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.

1.1

F1 and the common law give EYk=E[X11{X1k}]. The integrands tend pointwise to X1 and their absolute values are bounded by the integrable X1. Thus F2 gives EYkEX1.

F1F2
2.1

Apply F3 to the numerical sequence of finite expectations in step 1.1; reindexing its initial index from zero to one does not change its averages or their limit.

F3step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources