Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cesaro limit of truncated means

Statement

For identically distributed integrable real (Xn), with Yk=Xk1{∣Xk∣≤k}, one has n−1∑k=1nEYk→EX1.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Change of variables for expectation: Let X:(Ω,F,P)→(S,Σ) be a random element, let PX be its law, and let g:(S,Σ)→R or g:(S,Σ)→C be measurable.

  1. If g≥0, then E[g(X)]=∫Sg dPX.
  2. If g(X) is integrable, then g is integrable with respect to PX and the same formula holds: E[g(X)]=∫Sg dPX.
[F2]

Dominated convergence: Let f and (fn) be measurable complex-valued functions such that fn→f almost everywhere and ∣fn∣≤g almost everywhere for a single nonnegative measurable function g with ∫g dμ<+∞. Then f∈L1(μ), ∫∣fn−f∣ dμ⟶0, and hence ∫fn dμ⟶∫f dμ.

[F3]

If xk→L then σn→L: convergence implies (C,1)-summability to the same value: Let (xk) be a sequence of reals that converges (def-sequence, def-real-limit), and let (σn) be its sequence of Cesaro means (def-cesaro-mean). Then (σn) converges as well, and

lim⁡nσn  =  lim⁡kxk.

Both limits are asserted to exist: the right-hand one by hypothesis, the left-hand one as part of the conclusion. Equivalently: a convergent sequence is (C,1)-summable, to its own limit. The notation is licensed by uniqueness of limits of real sequences (lem-limit-unique).

The converse is false (fs-cesaro-converse).

Proof

Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.

1.1F1F2

F1 and the common law give EYk=E[X11{∣X1∣≤k}]. The integrands tend pointwise to X1 and their absolute values are bounded by the integrable ∣X1∣. Thus F2 gives EYk→EX1.

2.1F3step 1.1∎

Apply F3 to the numerical sequence of finite expectations in step 1.1; reindexing its initial index from zero to one does not change its averages or their limit.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources