Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Short local geodesics in a CAT(1) space are geodesics, and closed local geodesics have length at least 2π

Statement

Let X be a CAT(1) space (Comparison triangles, the CAT(0) and CAT(1) inequalities, local CAT, local geodesics and round circles). Then:

(i) Unique short geodesics. Every two points p,q∈X with d(p,q)<π are joined by exactly one geodesic segment up to reparametrization (Geodesics and geodesic metric spaces); moreover the segment depends continuously on its endpoints: if pk→p, qk→q and d(p,q)<π, then the linear parametrizations of [pk,qk] converge uniformly to the linear parametrization of [p,q] (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xk→x iff d(xk,x)→0 in R).

(ii) Local geodesics of length at most π are geodesics. If I⊆R is an interval (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) and c ⁣:I→X is a constant-speed local geodesic of speed λ≥0 with L(c)≤π, then d(c(s),c(t))=λ∣s−t∣ for all s,t∈I. Here, for an arbitrary interval, L(c) means the supremum of the lengths on its nonempty compact subintervals, with value 0 for an empty interval. Every compact restriction, after translation and arclength reparametrization when λ>0, is a geodesic segment; speed zero gives a constant map.

(iii) Closed local geodesics are at least 2π long. If c ⁣:Sℓ1→X is a nonconstant closed local geodesic (i.e. it is locally isometric and parametrized by arclength, as in Comparison triangles, the CAT(0) and CAT(1) inequalities, local CAT, local geodesics and round circles), then ℓ≥2π; and the image of c has diameter at least π. Consequently no nonconstant closed local geodesic is contained in a ball of diameter <π (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A CAT(1) space X; for clause (i) points p,q∈X and geodesic segments [p,q],[p,q]′; for clause (ii) an interval I⊆R and a local geodesic c ⁣:I→X; for clause (iii) a nonconstant closed local geodesic c ⁣:Sℓ1→X.

[F1]

Comparison triangles, the CAT(0) and CAT(1) inequalities, local CAT, local geodesics and round circles: CAT(1) means every pair of points at distance <π is joined by a geodesic segment, every geodesic triangle of perimeter <2π satisfies d(x,y)≤dS(xˉ,yˉ) for all points x,y of the triangle, and constant-speed local geodesics satisfy locally d(c(t′),c(t′′))=λ∣t′−t′′∣ for a fixed λ≥0, with the unit-speed convention λ=1; Sℓ1 is the circle of circumference ℓ.

[F2]

Comparison triangles in the Euclidean plane and the round sphere, model spaces, and CAT(0) and CAT(1) consequences: for side lengths satisfying the triangle inequalities with perimeter <2π a comparison triangle in S2 exists and is unique up to isometry; the spherical cosine rule holds: for A,B,C∈S2 with a=dS(B,C), b=dS(C,A), c=dS(A,B)<π and vertex angle γ at C, cos⁡c=cos⁡acos⁡b+sin⁡asin⁡bcos⁡γ.

[F3]

Geodesics and geodesic metric spaces: a geodesic segment from x to y is a path γ with d(γ(s),γ(t))=∣s−t∣; its midpoint is the point at equal distance from x and y, and a segment of length 0 is degenerate with midpoint its point.

[F5]

Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xk→x iff d(xk,x)→0 in R: xk→x means d(xk,x)→0, and uniform convergence of maps is convergence in the supremum metric.

[F6]

Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space: B(x,r)={y:d(x,y)<r}. A nonempty bounded set A has diameter sup⁡{d(a,b):a,b∈A} (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space); thus diameter <π implies that every pairwise distance is <π, without asserting the converse.

[F7]

Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric: the triangle inequality d(x,z)≤d(x,y)+d(y,z) holds, and a path parametrized proportionally to arclength whose length equals its endpoint distance gives a geodesic segment after translation and arclength reparametrization.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3algebra

Uniqueness of short geodesics. Let p,q∈X with d(p,q)<π and let g,g′ be geodesic segments from p to q, parametrized linearly on [0,d(p,q)]. Fix t∈[0,d(p,q)], put r=g(t) and r′=g′(t), and consider the geodesic triangle with vertices p,q,r whose sides are the segment g′ from p to q and the two subarcs of g from p to r and from r to q; its side lengths are d(p,q), d(p,r)=t and d(r,q)=d(p,q)−t, so its perimeter is 2d(p,q)<2π and its spherical comparison triangle is degenerate, with rˉ lying on the side [pˉ,qˉ] at distance t from pˉ. The comparison point of r′ is the point of [pˉ,qˉ] at distance t from pˉ, because r′ lies on the side g′ at that distance from p; by degeneracy this comparison point equals rˉ. The CAT(1) inequality applied to the pair (r,r′) of points of this triangle gives d(r,r′)≤dS(rˉ,rˉ)=0, so r=r′. Since t was arbitrary, g=g′ as linearly parametrized segments; hence geodesics between points at distance <π are unique up to reparametrization.

1.2F1F2F3algebra

Hinge estimate for one common initial point. Fix p∈X and ℓ<π, let q,q′∈X satisfy d(p,q),d(p,q′)≤ℓ and Δ:=d(q,q′)<2π−2ℓ, and let c,c′ be the linear parametrizations of the unique geodesic segments from p to q and to q′. If d(q,q′) is small enough that d(p,q),d(p,q′),Δ form an admissible triangle with perimeter <2π, then the triangle with vertices p,q,q′ and sides c,c′ and a segment from q′ to q is a geodesic triangle of perimeter ≤2ℓ+Δ<2π, and the CAT(1) inequality applied to the pair of its points c(t),c′(t) gives d(c(t),c′(t))≤dS(cˉ(t),cˉ′(t)), where cˉ(t),cˉ′(t) lie on the comparison sides at distances t d(p,q) and t d(p,q′) from pˉ. With γˉ the model angle at pˉ, the cosine rule [F2] gives cos⁡dS(cˉ(t),cˉ′(t))=cos⁡(tL)cos⁡(tL′)+sin⁡(tL)sin⁡(tL′)cos⁡γˉ and cos⁡γˉ=(cos⁡Δ−cos⁡Lcos⁡L′)/(sin⁡Lsin⁡L′), where L=d(p,q), L′=d(p,q′); the right-hand side is jointly continuous in (t,L,L′,Δ) on the compact family and equals 1 when Δ=0 and L=L′, while for L=0 or L′=0 the bound d(c(t),c′(t))≤t(L+L′) is immediate; hence sup⁡t∈[0,1]d(c(t),c′(t))→0 as (Δ,L−L′)→0.

2.1step 1.2F5F3algebra

Continuous dependence of clause (i). Let pk→p, qk→q with d(p,q)<π, and let ck,c be the linear parametrizations of [pk,qk], [p,q]; for large k all lengths are at most some ℓ<π. Fix such k and let ck′ be the linear parametrization of the unique segment from pk to q, which exists for large k because d(pk,q)≤d(pk,p)+d(p,q)<π. Then d(ck(t),c(t))≤d(ck(t),ck′(t))+d(ck′(t),c(t)) for all t: the first term tends to 0 uniformly by the hinge estimate at the common initial point pk with endpoint distance d(qk,q)→0, and the second term tends to 0 uniformly by the hinge estimate applied to the reversed segments, which have common initial point q and endpoint distance d(pk,p)→0. Hence the linear parametrizations of [pk,qk] converge uniformly to that of [p,q].

2.2F1F2F3F4F7step 1.1algebra

A unit-speed local geodesic minimizes on every short interval. Assume the speed is 1 and fix s<t in I with t−s≤π. A finite subdivision into local isometry intervals shows that c∣[s,t] is 1-Lipschitz and has length t−s. Let S={u∈[s,t]:c∣[s,u] is a geodesic}. It contains an initial interval by local isometry, and it is closed: the distance equalities on [s,u] pass to the limit as u increases or decreases to an endpoint. Put u0=sup⁡S∈S. If u0<t, choose 0<ε<u0−s with u0+ε<t, u0+ε−s<π, and c∣[u0−ε,u0+ε] isometric. This is possible since u0−s<t−s≤π. The triangle with vertices c(s),c(u0),c(u0+ε) and its two indicated subarcs has perimeter at most 2(u0+ε−s)<2π. In its model let βˉ be the angle at cˉ(u0). The local isometry gives d(c(u0−σ),c(u0+τ))=σ+τ for small positive σ,τ<ε. Comparison and the cosine rule therefore force βˉ=π: any smaller angle gives a model cross-distance strictly less than σ+τ. Thus the opposite side has length u0+ε−s, and the whole subarc c∣[s,u0+ε] minimizes. Indeed, a strict shortcut between any two of its points, combined with the remaining subarcs, would make its endpoint distance smaller than its length. This contradicts the definition of u0. Hence u0=t and d(c(s),c(t))=t−s.

3.1step 2.2F1F3F4F7algebra

Clause (ii) with arbitrary speed. If λ=0, the map is locally constant and therefore constant on the connected interval I: the inverse image of each attained value is open and its complement is a union of such open fibers. If λ>0, set J=λI and c~(u)=c(u/λ). This is unit-speed locally; finite partitions show that lengths of corresponding compact restrictions agree. For s<t in I, a finite local-isometry subdivision gives L(c∣[s,t])=λ(t−s)≤L(c)≤π. Applying step 2.2 to c~∣[λs,λt] gives d(c(s),c(t))=λ(t−s). Empty and one-point intervals have no unequal pair to test. This proves the distance equality and the stated segment interpretation.

4.1step 3.1step 1.1F1algebra

Clause (iii): ℓ≥2π. Suppose a nonconstant closed local geodesic c ⁣:Sℓ1→X had ℓ<2π, and put p=c(0), q=c(ℓ/2); the arcs α(θ)=c(θ) and β(θ)=c(ℓ−θ), θ∈[0,ℓ/2], are local geodesics of length ℓ/2<π, hence geodesic segments from p to q by step 3.1, and d(p,q)≤ℓ/2<π. Since d(p,α(θ))=θ=d(p,β(θ)) for all θ∈[0,ℓ/2], step 1.1 (uniqueness) gives c(θ)=c(ℓ−θ) for every θ∈[0,ℓ/2]. But c is locally isometric at p, so for small θ>0 with 2θ<ℓ one has d(c(θ),c(−θ))=2θ, where c(−θ):=c(ℓ−θ); this contradicts c(θ)=c(ℓ−θ) and θ>0. Hence ℓ≥2π.

4.2step 3.1step 2.2F6algebra

Clause (iii): diameter at least π. Let c be as in clause (iii) with ℓ≥2π and fix θ0; the restriction of c to [θ0,θ0+π] is a local geodesic of length π (its length equals the parameter length by the first paragraph of step 2.2), so step 3.1 gives d(c(θ0),c(θ0+π))=π. Hence the image of c has diameter at least π, and by definition of diameter a nonconstant closed local geodesic is never contained in a ball of diameter <π.

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2F1∎

Conclusion. Clause (i) is step 2.1; clause (ii) is step 3.1; clause (iii) is steps 4.1 and 4.2. Therefore in a CAT(1) space short geodesics are unique and depend continuously on their endpoints, every constant-speed local geodesic of length at most π minimizes between its points, and every nonconstant closed local geodesic has length at least 2π and diameter at least π.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources