Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Additivity, naturality and the splitting principle for Chern classes

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) inherited from the smooth-immersion and homological suppliers. Let k be a field, X a smooth equidimensional k-scheme of finite type, and let 0→E′→E→E′′→0 be a short exact sequence of finite locally free OX-modules (Locally free sheaves of finite rank). Ranks are allowed to be locally constant: define Chern classes componentwise on the finitely many open-and-closed rank loci, using Chern classes of a vector bundle on a smooth scheme on each constant-rank locus. Then:

  1. (Whitney additivity) c(E)=c(E′) c(E′′) in the Chow ring A∗(X) (Chern classes of a vector bundle on a smooth scheme, The intersection product and Chow ring of a smooth scheme).
  2. (Naturality) If f:X′→X is a flat morphism of smooth equidimensional k-schemes of finite type, then ci(f∗E)=f∗ci(E) for all i.
  3. (Splitting principle) There exists a morphism f:X′→X, a composition of projective bundles over X, with X′ smooth and equidimensional, such that f∗:A∗(X)→A∗(X′) is injective. On each rank locus Xr={x:rank⁡xE=r}, its inverse image admits a filtration 0=E0⊆E1⊆⋯⊆Er=f∗E with successive quotients invertible sheaves L1,…,Lr; consequently f∗c(E)=∏i=1r(1+c1(Li)). Any polynomial identity among Chern classes that is proved on every rank locus after replacing E by such a filtered bundle and ci(E) by the elementary symmetric functions ei(c1(Lj)) holds for E itself.
  4. (Consequences) ci(E∨)=(−1)ici(E); c1(L⊗M)=c1(L)+c1(M) for invertible sheaves; ci(E)=0 for i>r on Xr; and for an exact sequence of vector bundles the total Chern classes multiply (this is (1)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice; a smooth equidimensional finite type k-scheme X; an exact sequence 0→E′→E→E′′→0 of finite locally free OX-modules.

[L1]

The operational Chern operators satisfy the Whitney formula, normalization, compatibility with base restriction and the splitting principle by iterated projective bundles with injective flat pullback, and the regular-section formula (Operational Chern classes and the Whitney formula, Chern classes of a vector bundle on a smooth scheme).

[L2]

The operational action on a smooth scheme agrees with multiplication in the Chow ring, so operational identities become ring identities; ring pullback is the graph Gysin pullback and agrees with flat pullback for flat morphisms (The intersection product and Chow ring of a smooth scheme, Naturality of the Chow ring and the projection formula).

[L3]

Projective bundle pullback is injective and flat pullback on Chow groups is functorial (The projective bundle formula for Chow groups, Flat pullback of cycles and of rational equivalence, Refined Gysin pullback for regular embeddings).

[L4]

First Chern classes of invertible sheaves are computed by rational sections and their divisors; the dual of a line bundle has the negative first Chern class (Intersection with an invertible sheaf and the first Chern class).

Proof

technique · direct; transport the operational Whitney and splitting arguments to the Chow ring through the operational isomorphism
1.1L1L2givenalgebra

Whitney additivity. By [L1] the operational classes of E satisfy c(E)=c(E′)c(E′′): after simultaneous flag pullback the two filtrations concatenate to a line filtration of the middle bundle, whose Chern product is determined by successive Cartier hyperplanes; injectivity of projective-bundle pullback descends the identity; under the operational isomorphism of [L2] this identity of operators is the ring identity c(E)=c(E′)c(E′′) in A∗(X).

1.2L1L2givenalgebra

Naturality. For a flat morphism f:X′→X of smooth equidimensional finite type k-schemes, the pullback f∗ on the Chow ring agrees with flat pullback by [L2], and flat pullback commutes with the operational cap actions by [L1]; applying this to the definitions ci(E)=ci(E)∩[X] and using the projection formula of [L2] gives f∗ci(E)=ci(f∗E).

2.1L1L3step 1.1algebra

The splitting principle. Since X is quasi-compact, the locally constant rank of E has finite image; its rank loci Xr are open and closed. Chern classes, cycle groups and rational equivalence decompose over this finite disjoint union, so [L1] applies on every constant-rank locus (and on a common refinement of the three rank decompositions for Whitney additivity). If X is empty, its Chow ring is zero and take the identity with empty filtrations. Otherwise let R be the largest occurring rank. If R≤1, take f=id⁡, with the empty filtration on X0 and the one-step filtration on X1. Otherwise build a tower indexed by j=R,R−1,…,2. Over a locus of original rank r≥j, projectivize the current kernel bundle of rank j and replace it by the kernel of its tautological line quotient. Over a locus with r<j, projectivize the trivial bundle of rank j and leave the pulled-back E unchanged. At each stage these bundles glue across the open-and-closed loci to a bundle of constant rank j, so every projection is smooth of constant relative dimension j−1 and has injective flat pullback by [L3]. The resulting X′ is smooth equidimensional of dimension dim⁡X+R(R−1)/2. On each inverse image of Xr, the successive tautological kernels, reversed in order, yield a filtration with exactly r invertible quotients. Repeated Whitney additivity gives f∗c(E)∣f−1Xr=∏i=1r(1+c1(Li)); the composite pullback is injective, so polynomial identities verified on every rank locus descend to X.

3.1L1L4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Consequences. The dual of the filtration has successive quotients Li∨ with c1(Li∨)=−c1(Li) by [L4], so multiplying ∏i(1−c1(Li)) gives ci(E∨)=(−1)ici(E) after injectivity; the tensor identity for line bundles follows by multiplying rational sections and adding their Cartier divisors by [L4]; the vanishing ci(E)=0 for i>rank⁡E is the defining relation of [L1], and the multiplicativity for exact sequences is step 1.1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources