How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A concordance annulus gives a zero-surgery cobordism
Statement
Let A be a proper annulus in a compact oriented 4-manifold W, with boundary knots K₀ and K₁ in the two boundary 3-spheres. Assume A has an oriented normal disk neighborhood A×D² whose endpoint framings are the preferred zero-linking longitudes. Let R be Z or R_n=Z[1/|n|], and assume each end S³→W is an R-homology isomorphism. Removing A×D² and attaching D²×S¹×I along the annular side, with ∂D² matched to the annulus longitude and the core matched to the normal meridian, produces a cobordism V from M(K₀) to M(K₁). The statement predicts that the boundary inclusions M(K_i)→V are R-homology isomorphisms. If W is simply connected, it also predicts that π₁(V) is normally generated by either endpoint knot-group image.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the proper annulus , its supplied relative normal disk neighborhood , its endpoint zero framings, and the stated -homology isomorphisms.
Zero surgery fills the preferred longitude. Zero-framed surgery on a knot
The supplied proper product collars permit the displayed cut-and-paste constructions at both ends. Locally flat proper surfaces and concordance collars
Excisive covers have the natural small-chain Mayer–Vietoris sequence, including with constant coefficients; the chain construction descends to relative pairs. Excision and Mayer–Vietoris with local coefficients
The fundamental group of a union with connected overlap is the pushout of the two factor groups. Seifert–van Kampen identifies the fundamental group with a group pushout
Proof
Put , , and , , . The supplied product identifies with , with , with , and with its endpoint torus. Attach along , identifying its disk-boundary circle with the annulus longitude and its other circle with the normal meridian. Each endpoint boundary is then filled by along the preferred longitude, precisely by [F1]. The common annular-side collar gives a manifold after gluing, with the same smooth or topological category as the supplied data; in the smooth case round the product corners. This constructs with the prescribed oriented ends.
Here is the relative chain comparison in every degree. Thicken the pieces slightly along their supplied common collars to make excisive covers, using the same thickening at the ends; the thickenings retract onto the indicated pieces and intersections as pairs. For either decomposition with corresponding endpoint , the small-chain sequence underlying [F3], quotiented by the endpoint sequence, is degreewise exact: , with maps and . Exactness follows simplex by simplex, and subdivision and its prism preserve the endpoint chains, so the last complex computes . Its connecting map sends a relative cycle to the class of in the intersection quotient. Thus it supplies the relative exact sequence in all degrees, including degrees zero and one, rather than only a comparison of absolute ranks.
The endpoint inclusions and are deformation retractions up to inverse inclusion, by linearly contracting the coordinate to . Their relative homology groups therefore vanish in every degree. Apply step 2.1 to : the exact sequence gives for every . The latter groups vanish because induces homology isomorphisms in every degree, as follows directly from the long exact sequence of this pair. Next is also a product deformation retraction. Applying the same exact sequence to gives for every . The pair sequence now proves that each is an -homology isomorphism, including in degree zero and the top degrees.
Suppose finally that . The exterior is connected: is connected, and its side are connected, and any other component of the manifold would be a component of disjoint from the gluing side. Choose basepoint paths in and write for its annulus and meridian circles. The map is surjective with kernel normally generated by . The pushout [F4] consequently identifies with ; this follows also directly by eliminating the generator of the second factor in its amalgamated presentation. Thus normally generates . For the second gluing, is surjective with kernel generated by , so the same elimination gives . The image of still normally generates this quotient and lies in each endpoint knot-exterior group, hence in its zero-surgery group image. This proves the stated endpoint normal-generation conclusion. The proof uses the normal neighborhood already assumed in the Statement and makes no assertion that local flatness alone constructs it.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tim D. Cochran, Christopher W. Davis, and Arunima Ray, "Injectivity of satellite operators in knot concordance" (standard reference, not scraped)