How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A sequence converges in the topology of pointwise convergence exactly when it converges at every point
Statement
Let be a set, let be a topological space, and give the topology of pointwise convergence (The topology of pointwise convergence on , which is the product topology, and its restriction to ). Let be a sequence in and let . Then
convergence being that of Convergence and cluster points of a sequence in a topological space, sequential continuity, and the sequential closure on both sides.
No uniqueness of limits is asserted on either side. In a general topological space a sequence may converge to several points, and the equivalence above is between two conditions on the pair , not between two values (Convergence and cluster points of a sequence in a topological space, sequential continuity, and the sequential closure). No choice principle is used: the only selection made below is of a least natural number and of a maximum among finitely many.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set , a topological space , the space with the topology of pointwise convergence, a sequence in and a point ; is the canonical natural of (The canonical natural of a field).
For and the set is open in , and the sets , for , points and open , form a basis for the topology of pointwise convergence (The topology of pointwise convergence on , which is the product topology, and its restriction to , The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space, A family is a basis for a unique topology iff it covers the set and every point of an intersection of two members lies in a member inside that intersection; finite intersections of any subbasis form a basis).
A set is a neighbourhood of a point exactly when there is an open with ; in particular an open set containing is a neighbourhood of (Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open).
in a topological space means: for every neighbourhood of there is with for every (Convergence and cluster points of a sequence in a topological space, sequential continuity, and the sequential closure).
If is a basis for a topology and is a neighbourhood of , then there is with (Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open, Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets).
Every nonempty subset of has a least element (The well-ordering principle).
For and natural numbers there is an index with for every : the nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum, attained at some index, and is strictly increasing on , hence reflects the order (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, The canonical natural of a field).
Proof
Suppose in ; fix and a neighbourhood of in , and fix an open with .
Suppose instead that in for every , and let be a neighbourhood of in .
Under the assumption of step 1.1: is open in and contains , hence is a neighbourhood of , so there is with for every , that is for every .
Under the assumption of step 1.2: there are , points and open such that , where .
Since was an arbitrary neighbourhood of and an arbitrary point of , step 2.1 says exactly that in for every ; this is the forward implication.
If in step 2.2 then is the empty intersection , so for every .
If in step 2.2 then for each the set is nonempty, because gives with open, hence is a neighbourhood of , and ; put .
If : there is with for every , and then every satisfies for every , so for every , that is .
By steps 3.2 and 4.1 there is in either case a with for every , namely when and when ; as was an arbitrary neighbourhood of , this says in , which is the converse implication.
Steps 3.1 and 5.1 are the two implications, so the two conditions are equivalent.
Remarks
-
This is what the name of the topology records. The topology of pointwise convergence is defined as the product topology (The topology of pointwise convergence on , which is the product topology, and its restriction to ), with no reference to sequences; the lemma above is what makes the name accurate, and it is the reason the product topology, rather than the box topology, is the one used on a set of functions.
-
The corresponding statement for the box topology is false. A basic box constrains a member of at every index at once, so a sequence converging in the box topology must converge in a much stronger sense; the failure of the characteristic property of the box topology is recorded on the page that builds it (The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space).
-
Nothing here makes the pointwise topology well behaved for limits of continuous functions. A pointwise limit of continuous functions need not be continuous, so is in general not closed in for this topology; that failure is what the uniform topology of this page repairs, and it is witnessed on the companion page.
Depends on
- The topology of pointwise convergence on $Y^{X}$, which is the product topology, and its restriction to $C(X,Y)$
- Convergence and cluster points of a sequence in a topological space, sequential continuity, and the sequential closure
- The product set $\prod_{i \in I} X_i$ of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space
- Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open
- Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets
- A family is a basis for a unique topology iff it covers the set and every point of an intersection of two members lies in a member inside that intersection; finite intersections of any subbasis form a basis
- The well-ordering principle
- Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum
- Maximum and minimum of a set
- The canonical natural $\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F$ of a field
- Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing
Used by
- Refuted: C(X,Y) is closed in the topology of pointwise convergence. The ramps on [0,1] converge pointwise to a discontinuous limit Counterexample
- The moving spikes on [0,1] converge pointwise to 0, do not converge uniformly, and do not converge in the topology of compact convergence Example
- FALSE: a pointwise convergent sequence of continuous functions converges uniformly on every compact set False statement
- Convergence in the uniform metric is exactly uniform convergence: one N serving every point Lemma
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 82 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Topology of pointwise convergence (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Munkres, Topology, 2nd ed., §46 (standard reference, not scraped)