Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Convergence in the uniform metric is exactly uniform convergence: one N serving every point

Statement

Let X be a nonempty set, let (Y,d) be a metric space (Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric), and let ρˉ be the uniform metric on YX (For a nonempty set X and a metric space (Y,d) the uniform metric ρˉ(f,g)=sup⁡xmin⁡{d(f(x),g(x)),1} is a metric on YX). Let (fk) be a sequence in YX and let f∈YX. Then

fk→f in (YX,ρˉ)⟺(fk) converges uniformly to f,

convergence in a metric space being Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xk→x iff d(xk,x)→0 in R and uniform convergence being Uniform convergence, and the topology of uniform convergence: the metric topology of the uniform metric on YX and on C(X,Y).

This is what makes the name of the topology accurate, and it is the reason the truncation at 1 in the uniform metric costs nothing: below the threshold the truncated and untruncated distances agree, and convergence is a statement about arbitrarily small distances. No choice principle is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty set X, a metric space (Y,d), the truncated metric dˉ=min⁡{d,1} on Y, the uniform metric ρˉ(g,h)=sup⁡xdˉ(g(x),h(x)) on YX, a sequence (fk) in YX and a point f∈YX.

[L1]

dˉ(u,v)≤d(u,v) and dˉ(u,v)≤1 for all u,v∈Y, the minimum of a two-element set of reals being a lower bound of both elements and one of them (min⁡(d,1) and d/(1+d) are metrics uniformly equivalent to d, so every metric space carries a bounded metric with the same topology, Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set).

[L2]

If dˉ(u,v)<1 then dˉ(u,v)=d(u,v): the minimum min⁡{d(u,v),1} is one of its two arguments, and it is not 1, so it is d(u,v) (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set, min⁡(d,1) and d/(1+d) are metrics uniformly equivalent to d, so every metric space carries a bounded metric with the same topology).

[L3]

ρˉ(g,h) is an upper bound of { dˉ(g(x),h(x)):x∈X } and is the least one; in particular dˉ(g(x),h(x))≤ρˉ(g,h) for every x∈X, and any real bounding all these values above bounds ρˉ(g,h) (For a nonempty set X and a metric space (Y,d) the uniform metric ρˉ(f,g)=sup⁡xmin⁡{d(f(x),g(x)),1} is a metric on YX, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Suprema and infima are unique).

[L4]

gk→g in a metric space means: for every rational ε>0 there is K∈N with the distance from gk to g below ε for every k≥K; and the test with a real ε>0 is equivalent, since below every positive real lies a positive rational (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xk→x iff d(xk,x)→0 in R, The rationals embed densely in the reals, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

[L5]

The minimum of two positive reals is positive, and halving a positive real gives a positive real strictly below it (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose (fk) converges uniformly to f, and let ε>0 be real.

assume-hyp
1.2

Suppose instead that fk→f in (YX,ρˉ), and let ε>0 be real.

assume-hyp
2.1

Under step 1.1: put η:=ε/2, a real with 0<η<ε, and take K∈N with d(fk(x),f(x))<η for every x∈X and every k≥K.

step 1.1L5choose
2.2

Under step 1.2: put η:=min⁡{ε,1}/2, a real with 0<η≤1/2<1 and η<ε, and take K∈N with ρˉ(fk,f)<η for every k≥K.

step 1.2L4L5choose
3.1

Under step 1.1: for k≥K and every x∈X we have dˉ(fk(x),f(x))≤d(fk(x),f(x))<η, so η bounds that set of values above and hence ρˉ(fk,f)≤η<ε.

step 2.1L1L3
3.2

Under step 1.2: for k≥K and every x∈X we have dˉ(fk(x),f(x))≤ρˉ(fk,f)<η<1, so dˉ(fk(x),f(x))=d(fk(x),f(x)) and therefore d(fk(x),f(x))<η<ε.

step 2.2L2L3
4.1

Step 3.1 produces, for each real ε>0, an index K with ρˉ(fk,f)<ε for every k≥K, which is convergence fk→f in (YX,ρˉ); this is the forward implication.

step 3.1L4
4.2

Step 3.2 produces, for each real ε>0, an index K with d(fk(x),f(x))<ε for every x∈X and every k≥K, which is uniform convergence of (fk) to f; this is the converse implication.

step 3.2
5.1

Steps 4.1 and 4.2 are the two implications, so the two conditions are equivalent.

step 4.1step 4.2∎

Remarks

  • Where the threshold 1 enters and where it does not. It enters only in step 3.2, which needs the distance to be strictly below 1 before the truncation can be undone; that is arranged by shrinking η to at most 1/2, which costs nothing because η is being made small anyway. It does not enter the forward direction at all, since dˉ≤d outright.

  • The lemma fails for the value of the distance, not for convergence. The numbers ρˉ(f,g) and sup⁡xd(f(x),g(x)) differ as soon as some distance exceeds 1, and the second need not exist. What the lemma says is that the two determine the same convergent sequences and the same limits, which is all a topology sees.

  • Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence, and not conversely. From the definition, an index serving every point serves each point separately, so a uniformly convergent sequence converges at every point (A sequence converges in the topology of pointwise convergence exactly when it converges at every point). The converse fails, and the companion page exhibits the standard witness on [0,1].

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Uniform convergence, and the topology of uniform convergence: the metric topology of the uniform metric on Y^X and on C(X,Y).

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources