Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The moving spikes on [0,1][0,1] converge pointwise to 00, do not converge uniformly, and do not converge in the topology of compact convergence

Example

Let I:=[0,1]I := [0,1] with the metric inherited from R\mathbb{R}, let ak:=1/ι(k+2)a_k := 1/\iota(k+2) for kNk \in \mathbb{N} (The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field), and let fk:IRf_k : I \to \mathbb{R} be the moving spike

fk(t)=tak  (0tak),fk(t)=2tak  (akt2ak),fk(t)=0  (2akt1),f_k(t) = \frac{t}{a_k} \ \ (0 \le t \le a_k), \qquad f_k(t) = 2 - \frac{t}{a_k} \ \ (a_k \le t \le 2a_k), \qquad f_k(t) = 0 \ \ (2a_k \le t \le 1),

which is exactly the family built in FALSE: a pointwise convergent sequence of continuous functions converges uniformly on every compact set: each fkf_k is continuous, and (fk)(f_k) converges pointwise to the constant function 0\mathbf{0}, which is continuous. Write ρˉ\bar\rho for the uniform metric on RI\mathbb{R}^{I} (For a nonempty set XX and a metric space (Y,d)(Y,d) the uniform metric ρˉ(f,g)=supxmin{d(f(x),g(x)),1}\bar\rho(f,g) = \sup_{x} \min\{d(f(x),g(x)), 1\} is a metric on YXY^{X}).

This example traces the one family through all three topologies of the A page:

  1. fk0f_k \to \mathbf{0} in the topology of pointwise convergence (The topology of pointwise convergence on YXY^{X}, which is the product topology, and its restriction to C(X,Y)C(X,Y));
  2. ρˉ(fk,0)=1\bar\rho(f_k, \mathbf{0}) = 1 for every kk, so (fk)(f_k) does not converge to 0\mathbf{0} in the topology of uniform convergence (Uniform convergence, and the topology of uniform convergence: the metric topology of the uniform metric on YXY^{X} and on C(X,Y)C(X,Y));
  3. (fk)(f_k) does not converge to 0\mathbf{0} in the topology of compact convergence either (The topology of compact convergence on C(X,Y)C(X,Y) for metric XX and YY: uniform convergence on each compact subset of XX).

So the two inclusions of On C(X,Y)C(X,Y) with XX and YY metric, uniform convergence is finer than compact convergence, which is finer than pointwise convergence are strict on C(I,R)C(I,\mathbb{R}) at the leftmost step: pointwise convergence is strictly weaker than convergence on compact sets. The two rightmost topologies coincide here, because II is itself compact; separating those two needs a domain that is not compact, and the next counterexample on this page does it on R\mathbb{R}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: I=[0,1]I = [0,1] with the metric d(s,t)=std(s,t) = |s-t|, the reals ak=1/ι(k+2)a_k = 1/\iota(k+2), the spikes fkf_k displayed above, the constant function 0\mathbf{0}, and the truncated metric dˉ=min{d,1}\bar d = \min\{d,1\} on R\mathbb{R}.

[L2]

0fk(t)10 \le f_k(t) \le 1 for every tIt \in I: on [0,ak][0,a_k] the value t/akt/a_k lies between 00 and 11, on [ak,2ak][a_k,2a_k] the value 2t/ak2 - t/a_k does, and on [2ak,1][2a_k,1] it is 00 (Maximum and minimum of a set, Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum).

[L5]

A sequence converges in the topology of pointwise convergence exactly when it converges at every point (A sequence converges in the topology of pointwise convergence exactly when it converges at every point).

[L6]

The topology of uniform convergence is finer than the topology of compact convergence, which is finer than the topology of pointwise convergence, so convergence in a finer topology implies convergence in a coarser one (On C(X,Y)C(X,Y) with XX and YY metric, uniform convergence is finer than compact convergence, which is finer than pointwise convergence).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

(fk)(f_k) converges to 0\mathbf{0} at every point of II, hence in the topology of pointwise convergence; this is claim 1.

L1L5
1.2

For every kk and every tIt \in I: fk(t)0(t)=fk(t)1|f_k(t) - \mathbf{0}(t)| = f_k(t) \le 1, so dˉ(fk(t),0(t))=fk(t)\bar d(f_k(t),\mathbf{0}(t)) = f_k(t).

L2L3
2.1

Hence 11 is an upper bound of {dˉ(fk(t),0(t)):tI}\{\, \bar d(f_k(t),\mathbf{0}(t)) : t \in I \,\} and the value 11 is attained at t=akIt = a_k \in I, so ρˉ(fk,0)=1\bar\rho(f_k,\mathbf{0}) = 1 for every kNk \in \mathbb{N}.

step 1.2L1L2L3
3.1

Therefore no index KK makes ρˉ(fk,0)<1/2\bar\rho(f_k,\mathbf{0}) < 1/2 for kKk \ge K, so (fk)(f_k) does not converge to 0\mathbf{0} in the uniform metric and hence not in the topology of uniform convergence; this is claim 2.

step 2.1L4
3.2

II is compact and fk(ak)0(ak)=1|f_k(a_k) - \mathbf{0}(a_k)| = 1, so fkBI(0,1/2)f_k \notin B_I(\mathbf{0}, 1/2) for every kk, while BI(0,1/2)B_I(\mathbf{0},1/2) is a member of a neighbourhood base at 0\mathbf{0} in the topology of compact convergence; so no tail of (fk)(f_k) lies in that neighbourhood and (fk)(f_k) does not converge to 0\mathbf{0} there, which is claim 3.

step 2.1L1L7
4.1

Claims 1 and 3 together show that convergence in the topology of pointwise convergence does not imply convergence in the topology of compact convergence, so the leftmost inclusion of the comparison theorem is strict on C(I,R)C(I,\mathbb{R}).

step 1.1step 3.2L6

Remarks

  • Nothing is lost and nothing is gained by the truncation. The uniform metric truncates distances at 11, and here the spikes never exceed 11, so ρˉ(fk,0)\bar\rho(f_k,\mathbf{0}) is the honest supremum of fk|f_k|. A family of spikes of height 55 would have ρˉ=1\bar\rho = 1 as well, which is exactly the sense in which the uniform metric records "not close" without recording how far.

  • The failure is at a moving point. For each fixed tt the values fk(t)f_k(t) are eventually 00; what prevents a single index from serving every tt is that the place where fkf_k equals 11 depends on kk and never disappears. That is the quantifier order of Uniform convergence, and the topology of uniform convergence: the metric topology of the uniform metric on YXY^{X} and on C(X,Y)C(X,Y), seen in one family.

  • On this domain the two right-hand topologies cannot be separated. Since I=[0,1]I = [0,1] is compact, K=IK = I is an admissible compact set and convergence on every compact subset of II is convergence on II itself, that is uniform convergence. Separating them needs a domain that is not compact, and the next counterexample on this page uses R\mathbb{R}.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 168 results over 27 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources