Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dini's theorem applied to a nondecreasing sequence of piecewise linear approximations on [0,1], and what fails when the limit is not continuous

Example

Let I:=[0,1] with the metric inherited from R and let ak:=1/ι(k+2) (The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field), so 0<ak≤1/2 and 1/2≤1−ak<1. Define the clipped identities

sk(t):=t  (0≤t≤1−ak),sk(t):=1−ak  (1−ak≤t≤1).

Then:

  1. each sk is continuous on the compact space I, and the sequence is nondecreasing at every point: sk(t)≤sk+1(t);
  2. sk(t)→t for every t∈I, and the limit function idI:t↦t is continuous;
  3. therefore Dini's theorem (Dini's theorem: on a compact metric space a nondecreasing sequence of continuous real functions converging pointwise to a continuous limit converges uniformly) applies and (sk) converges to idI uniformly — which is confirmed by the direct estimate ∣sk(t)−t∣≤ak for every t.

And the hypothesis that the limit is continuous cannot be dropped. On the same interval, define the ramps rk(t):=max⁡{0, 1−(1−t)/ak}(0≤t≤1). They are continuous and pointwise nonincreasing, but converge pointwise to the indicator of {1}, which is not continuous. The conclusion of Dini's theorem fails for them, since a uniform limit of continuous functions would be continuous. Thus continuity of the limit is not implied by the other hypotheses.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

ι is strictly increasing on N with ι(n)>0 for n≥1, and 0<u≤v gives 0<1/v≤1/u; hence 0<ak+1≤ak≤1/2 and 1/2≤1−ak≤1−ak+1<1 (The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[L2]

For every real η>0 there is a natural m≥1 with 1/ι(m)<η (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

[L8]

The maximum and the minimum of a two-element set of reals exist and are among its elements (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1L3L4

The two formulas for sk agree at t=1−ak, both giving 1−ak, and the closed sets [0,1−ak] and [1−ak,1] cover I since 0<1−ak<1; each restriction is the restriction of an affine map of R, so sk is a well-defined continuous function on I.

1.2L1L8

sk(t)=min⁡{t, 1−ak} for every t∈I: for t≤1−ak the minimum is t, and for t≥1−ak it is 1−ak.

1.3L1L3L4L8

For each k, the two affine pieces 0 and 1−(1−t)/ak meet at t=1−ak, so their maximum rk is continuous by the finite closed-cover pasting lemma. Since ak+1≤ak and 1−t≥0 on I, one has 1−(1−t)/ak+1≤1−(1−t)/ak and hence rk+1(t)≤rk(t).

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L1L8

sk(t)≤sk+1(t) for every t and k, since 1−ak≤1−ak+1 makes min⁡{t,1−ak}≤min⁡{t,1−ak+1}; with step 1.1 this is claim 1.

2.2step 1.2L1

0≤t−sk(t)≤ak for every t∈I: for t≤1−ak the difference is 0, and for t>1−ak it is t−(1−ak)≤1−(1−ak)=ak.

2.3L1L2L8step 1.3

For t<1, the reciprocal estimate [L2] gives ak<1−t for every sufficiently large k, so rk(t)=0 eventually; but rk(1)=1 for every k. Thus the pointwise limit is χ=1{1}. It is discontinuous at 1: for every δ>0, the point s=1−min⁡{δ/2,1/2} satisfies ∣s−1∣<δ and ∣χ(s)−χ(1)∣=1.

3.1step 2.2L1L2

Let ε>0 be real; by [L2] there is a natural m≥1 with 1/ι(m)<ε, and every k≥m has ak=1/ι(k+2)≤1/ι(m)<ε, so ∣sk(t)−t∣≤ak<ε for every t∈I.

4.1step 3.1L3

In particular sk(t)→t for every t∈I, and idI is continuous, being the restriction of an affine map; this is claim 2.

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1L5L6L7

I is a compact metric space, every sk is continuous, the sequence is pointwise nondecreasing and its pointwise limit idI is continuous, so Dini's theorem applies and (sk) converges to idI uniformly; step 3.1 exhibits the same conclusion directly, an index m serving every point at once.

6.1L5L7step 1.3step 2.3∎

If the ramps converged uniformly, [L7] would make χ continuous. Hence they do not converge uniformly, although they satisfy compactness, termwise continuity and pointwise monotonicity.

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

108 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources