Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dini's theorem applied to a nondecreasing sequence of piecewise linear approximations on [0,1][0,1], and what fails when the limit is not continuous

Example

Let I:=[0,1]I := [0,1] with the metric inherited from R\mathbb{R} and let ak:=1/ι(k+2)a_k := 1/\iota(k+2) (The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field), so 0<ak1/20 < a_k \le 1/2 and 1/21ak<11/2 \le 1 - a_k < 1. Define the clipped identities

sk(t):=t  (0t1ak),sk(t):=1ak  (1akt1).s_k(t) := t \ \ (0 \le t \le 1 - a_k), \qquad s_k(t) := 1 - a_k \ \ (1 - a_k \le t \le 1) .

Then:

  1. each sks_k is continuous on the compact space II, and the sequence is nondecreasing at every point: sk(t)sk+1(t)s_k(t) \le s_{k+1}(t);
  2. sk(t)ts_k(t) \to t for every tIt \in I, and the limit function idI:tt\mathrm{id}_I : t \mapsto t is continuous;
  3. therefore Dini's theorem (Dini's theorem: on a compact metric space a nondecreasing sequence of continuous real functions converging pointwise to a continuous limit converges uniformly) applies and (sk)(s_k) converges to idI\mathrm{id}_I uniformly — which is confirmed by the direct estimate sk(t)tak|s_k(t) - t| \le a_k for every tt.

And the hypothesis that the limit is continuous cannot be dropped. The ramps rkr_k of Refuted: C(X,Y)C(X,Y) is closed in the topology of pointwise convergence. The ramps on [0,1][0,1] converge pointwise to a discontinuous limit are continuous on the same compact II and pointwise nonincreasing, and they converge pointwise to the indicator of {1}\{1\}, which is not continuous; the conclusion of Dini's theorem fails for them, since a uniform limit of continuous functions would be continuous. So on a compact domain, with monotonicity and with continuity of every term, continuity of the limit is exactly the missing hypothesis, and it is not implied by the others.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: I=[0,1]I = [0,1] with d(s,t)=std(s,t) = |s-t| (The absolute value makes R\mathbb{R} a metric space: d(x,y)=xyd(x,y) = |x-y| is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (xr,x+r)(x-r, x+r), and it is unbounded, Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset, Intervals of R\mathbb{R}: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), the reals ak=1/ι(k+2)a_k = 1/\iota(k+2), the functions sks_k displayed above, and the identity idI\mathrm{id}_I of II.

[L1]

ι\iota is strictly increasing on N\mathbb{N} with ι(n)>0\iota(n) > 0 for n1n \ge 1, and 0<uv0 < u \le v gives 0<1/v1/u0 < 1/v \le 1/u; hence 0<ak+1ak1/20 < a_{k+1} \le a_k \le 1/2 and 1/21ak1ak+1<11/2 \le 1 - a_k \le 1 - a_{k+1} < 1 (The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[L2]

For every real η>0\eta > 0 there is a natural m1m \ge 1 with 1/ι(m)<η1/\iota(m) < \eta (For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon).

[L8]

The ramps rkr_k on II are continuous, are pointwise nonincreasing, and converge pointwise to the indicator χ\chi of {1}\{1\}, which is not continuous (Refuted: C(X,Y)C(X,Y) is closed in the topology of pointwise convergence. The ramps on [0,1][0,1] converge pointwise to a discontinuous limit).

[L9]

The maximum and the minimum of a two-element set of reals exist and are among its elements (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The two formulas for sks_k agree at t=1akt = 1 - a_k, both giving 1ak1 - a_k, and the closed sets [0,1ak][0,1-a_k] and [1ak,1][1-a_k,1] cover II since 0<1ak<10 < 1 - a_k < 1; each restriction is the restriction of an affine map of R\mathbb{R}, so sks_k is a well-defined continuous function on II.

L1L3L4
1.2

sk(t)=min{t, 1ak}s_k(t) = \min\{t,\ 1-a_k\} for every tIt \in I: for t1akt \le 1-a_k the minimum is tt, and for t1akt \ge 1-a_k it is 1ak1-a_k.

L1L9
2.1

sk(t)sk+1(t)s_k(t) \le s_{k+1}(t) for every tt and kk, since 1ak1ak+11 - a_k \le 1 - a_{k+1} makes min{t,1ak}min{t,1ak+1}\min\{t, 1-a_k\} \le \min\{t, 1-a_{k+1}\}; with step 1.1 this is claim 1.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L9
2.2

0tsk(t)ak0 \le t - s_k(t) \le a_k for every tIt \in I: for t1akt \le 1-a_k the difference is 00, and for t>1akt > 1-a_k it is t(1ak)1(1ak)=akt - (1-a_k) \le 1 - (1-a_k) = a_k.

step 1.2L1
3.1

Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0 be real; by [L2] there is a natural m1m \ge 1 with 1/ι(m)<ε1/\iota(m) < \varepsilon, and every kmk \ge m has ak=1/ι(k+2)1/ι(m)<εa_k = 1/\iota(k+2) \le 1/\iota(m) < \varepsilon, so sk(t)tak<ε|s_k(t) - t| \le a_k < \varepsilon for every tIt \in I.

step 2.2L1L2
4.1

In particular sk(t)ts_k(t) \to t for every tIt \in I, and idI\mathrm{id}_I is continuous, being the restriction of an affine map; this is claim 2.

step 3.1L3
5.1

II is a compact metric space, every sks_k is continuous, the sequence is pointwise nondecreasing and its pointwise limit idI\mathrm{id}_I is continuous, so Dini's theorem applies and (sk)(s_k) converges to idI\mathrm{id}_I uniformly; step 3.1 exhibits the same conclusion directly, an index mm serving every point at once.

step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1L5L6L7
6.1

For the failure clause, the ramps rkr_k are continuous on the same compact II and pointwise nonincreasing with pointwise limit the discontinuous χ\chi; were the convergence uniform, the limit would be continuous, so it is not uniform, and the conclusion of Dini's theorem fails for a family satisfying every one of its hypotheses except continuity of the limit.

step 5.1L5L7L8

Remarks

  • Dini's theorem is not needed for the positive half, and that is the point. Step 3.1 proves uniform convergence of (sk)(s_k) by hand, because the discrepancy tsk(t)t - s_k(t) is bounded by aka_k independently of tt. The example is worth stating because the general theorem gives the same conclusion from hypotheses that never mention a uniform bound: compactness, monotonicity, and continuity of the terms and of the limit.

  • Each hypothesis of Dini's theorem is doing something. Continuity of the limit fails for the ramps, and the conclusion fails with it. Compactness cannot be dropped either, though this page does not construct a witness for that. Monotonicity cannot be dropped: the moving spikes earlier on this page are continuous on the compact II, converge pointwise to the continuous 0\mathbf{0}, and do not converge uniformly, and they are not monotone at any point where the spike passes.

  • The nonincreasing form is the one the ramps illustrate, and it is the form obtained from Dini's theorem: on a compact metric space a nondecreasing sequence of continuous real functions converging pointwise to a continuous limit converges uniformly by applying it to the negatives of the functions, as that item's Statement records. Nothing here needs a separate proof.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 178 results over 34 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources