How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The map on and its transpose traced through the exponential law
Example
Take , and , all with the usual metric (The absolute value makes a metric space: is a metric, its open balls are the intervals , and it is unbounded), and let
Write for its transpose, so : each is the multiplication-by- map of . This example checks every clause of the exponential law (The exponential law: for a locally compact metric and any spaces and , transposition is a bijection between and with the compact-open topology) by hand on this pair:
- is continuous on with the product topology (The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space);
- each is continuous, being Lipschitz with constant , so ;
- is continuous for the compact-open topology, directly: if then ;
- is locally compact, so the exponential law applies and is a bijection whose inverse returns from .
Claim 3 is the content of If is continuous then its transpose , , is continuous for the compact-open topology, with no hypothesis on beyond being metric in this instance, verified without the tube lemma; claim 4 is where If is a locally compact metric space then the evaluation map is continuous for the compact-open topology is spent.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with ; the product with the product topology; the map and its transpose ; and for a natural the interval (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length, The canonical natural of a field).
The product topology on is the metric topology of (For the product topology on copies of the usual topology of is the metric topology of on , and hence also of and , so as a product and as a metric space are one space, as the set of functions , and , , are metrics on it, The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not, Maximum and minimum of a set, Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum).
- continuity of a map of metric spaces, and its agreement with continuity of the corresponding map of topological spaces (Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the - form, Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).
A map Lipschitz with some constant is continuous (Lipschitz map, -Hölder map for rational , and contraction, Contraction implies Lipschitz implies uniformly continuous implies continuous; every Hölder map is uniformly continuous, and a Lipschitz map on a bounded space is Hölder for every exponent, claims 2 and 3).
is a compact subset of for every natural , and every compact subset of lies in some ; the sets centred at are a neighbourhood base at in the compact-open topology on (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space, Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space, For a metric domain and a metric target the compact-open topology on is the topology of compact convergence, The topology of compact convergence on for metric and : uniform convergence on each compact subset of , fact (U4), The compact-open topology on for a metric domain , with subbasis ).
For every real there is a natural with , and for (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with , The canonical natural of a field).
is locally compact if every point has a compact set containing a ball around it; and then the exponential law holds for and arbitrary , with a bijection whose inverse sends to (Locally compact metric space: every point has a compact neighbourhood, The exponential law: for a locally compact metric and any spaces and , transposition is a bijection between and with the compact-open topology, The evaluation map , , Injection, surjection, bijection).
Verification
For claim 1, fix and a real , and put , a real with .
For fixed the map satisfies , so it is Lipschitz with constant and continuous; this is claim 2.
For claim 3, fix and a neighbourhood of in the compact-open topology; there are a compact and a real with , and a natural with , so .
For claim 4: given take a natural with ; then is compact and , since gives ; so is a locally compact metric space.
If then and , so .
Put ; if then for every we get , so .
Hence .
So is continuous at every point in the - sense for the metric , hence continuous as a map of topological spaces for the product topology; this is claim 1.
As was an arbitrary neighbourhood of and an arbitrary point, is continuous for the compact-open topology; this is claim 3, and it agrees with what If is continuous then its transpose , , is continuous for the compact-open topology, with no hypothesis on beyond being metric gives from claim 1.
The exponential law therefore applies with : transposition is a bijection between and , it sends the of claim 1 to the of claim 3, and its inverse sends back to , which is ; this is claim 4.
Remarks
-
Claim 3 is proved twice on purpose. The general theorem If is continuous then its transpose , , is continuous for the compact-open topology, with no hypothesis on beyond being metric derives it from the tube lemma, and the computation above derives it from a single estimate on . The second route is available here only because the compact sets of are contained in intervals on which the first variable is bounded; the tube lemma is what replaces that boundedness in general.
-
What is not checked here, because it is not claimed. Nothing above asserts that the bijection is a homeomorphism for any topology on the two sides. The exponential law: for a locally compact metric and any spaces and , transposition is a bijection between and with the compact-open topology is a bijection of sets of continuous maps, and its own remark records what the homeomorphism form would additionally require.
-
The transposed family is a line of linear maps. As runs over the functions sweep out the multiplications by , and claim 3 says that this sweep is continuous when nearness of two such maps is measured uniformly on each bounded interval. It is not continuous for the uniform metric on all of : for the difference exceeds once is large, so the uniform distance between and is whenever , which is the same phenomenon as the counterexample earlier on this page.
Depends on
- The exponential law: for a locally compact metric $X$ and any spaces $Z$ and $Y$, transposition is a bijection between $C(X \times Z, Y)$ and $C(Z, C(X,Y))$ with the compact-open topology
- If $f : X \times Z \to Y$ is continuous then its transpose $F : Z \to C(X,Y)$, $F(z)(x) = f(x,z)$, is continuous for the compact-open topology, with no hypothesis on $X$ beyond being metric
- If $X$ is a locally compact metric space then the evaluation map is continuous for the compact-open topology
- The compact-open topology on $C(X,Y)$ for a metric domain $X$, with subbasis $S(K,V) = \{f : f[K] \subseteq V\}$
- Locally compact metric space: every point has a compact neighbourhood
- The evaluation map $e : C(X,Y) \times X \to Y$, $e(f,x) = f(x)$
- The product set $\prod_{i \in I} X_i$ of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space
- For $n \ge 1$ the product topology on $n$ copies of the usual topology of $\mathbb{R}$ is the metric topology of $d_\infty$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$, and hence also of $d_1$ and $d_2$, so $\mathbb{R}^n$ as a product and $\mathbb{R}^n$ as a metric space are one space
- $\mathbb{R}^n$ as the set of functions $n \to \mathbb{R}$, and $d_1$, $d_2$, $d_\infty$ are metrics on it
- The absolute value makes $\mathbb{R}$ a metric space: $d(x,y) = |x-y|$ is a metric, its open balls are the intervals $(x-r, x+r)$, and it is unbounded
- Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space
- The topology of compact convergence on $C(X,Y)$ for metric $X$ and $Y$: uniform convergence on each compact subset of $X$
- For a metric domain and a metric target the compact-open topology on $C(X,Y)$ is the topology of compact convergence
- The canonical natural $\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F$ of a field
- For every $\varepsilon > 0$ in a complete ordered field there is a natural $n \ge 1$ with $1/n < \varepsilon$
- Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ form
- Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally
- Lipschitz map, $\alpha$-Hölder map for rational $0 < \alpha \le 1$, and contraction
- Contraction implies Lipschitz implies uniformly continuous implies continuous; every Hölder map is uniformly continuous, and a Lipschitz map on a bounded space is Hölder for every exponent
- Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space
- The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement
- Absolute value in an ordered field
- Basic properties of the absolute value
- The triangle inequality
- Maximum and minimum of a set
- Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum
- Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space
- Intervals of $\mathbb{R}$: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
- Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing
- Metric space: $d(x,y) = 0$ iff $x = y$, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- Every complete ordered field is Archimedean
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 190 results over 35 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Compact-open topology (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Exponential object (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)