Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If f:X×Z→Y is continuous then its transpose F:Z→C(X,Y), F(z)(x)=f(x,z), is continuous for the compact-open topology, with no hypothesis on X beyond being metric

Statement

Let (X,d) be a metric space carrying its metric topology (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not), let Z and Y be topological spaces (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison), and let

f:X×Z→Y

be continuous, the product carrying the product topology (The product set ∏i∈IXi of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space). For z∈Z define F(z):X→Y by F(z)(x):=f(x,z). Then:

  1. F(z)∈C(X,Y) for every z∈Z;
  2. the transpose F:Z→C(X,Y) is continuous when C(X,Y) carries the compact-open topology (The compact-open topology on C(X,Y) for a metric domain X, with subbasis S(K,V)={f:f[K]⊆V}).

No local compactness and no separation hypothesis is used, on any of the three spaces; X is metric only because the compact-open topology is defined here over the compact subsets of a metric space. No choice principle is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A metric space (X,d) with its metric topology, topological spaces Z and Y, a continuous f:X×Z→Y, and F(z)(x)=f(x,z).

[L7]

Tube lemma: for compact K⊆X, a point z0∈Z and an open N⊆X×Z with K×{z0}⊆N there is an open W⊆Z with z0∈W and K×W⊆N (Tube lemma: if K is a compact subset of a metric space X, Z is a topological space and N is open in X×Z with K×{z0}⊆N, then K×W⊆N for some open W∋z0).

[L8]

A subset of a topological space is open exactly when it is a neighbourhood of each of its points, that is when each of its points lies in an open set inside it (Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open, consequence 4).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix z∈Z and let jz:X→X×Z be the map jz(x):=(x,z); its components are the identity of X and the constant map at z, both continuous, so jz is continuous.

L1L3L4
2.1

F(z)=f∘jz, since (f∘jz)(x)=f(x,z)=F(z)(x) for every x∈X; hence F(z) is continuous and F(z)∈C(X,Y), which is claim 1.

step 1.1L2
3.1

For claim 2 it suffices, by [L5] and [L6], to show that F−1[S(K,V)] is open in Z for every compact K⊆X and every open V⊆Y.

step 2.1L5L6suffices: preimages of subbasic sets are open
3.2

Unwinding the definitions, F−1[S(K,V)]={ z∈Z:F(z)[K]⊆V }={ z∈Z:f(x,z)∈V for every x∈K }.

step 2.1L6
4.1

Let z0∈F−1[S(K,V)] and put N:=f−1[V], an open subset of X×Z; by step 3.2 every x∈K satisfies f(x,z0)∈V, that is K×{z0}⊆N.

step 3.2L9
5.1

The tube lemma applied to K, z0 and N gives an open W⊆Z with z0∈W and K×W⊆N.

step 4.1L7choose
6.1

Every z∈W then satisfies f(x,z)∈V for every x∈K, that is z∈F−1[S(K,V)]; so W is an open set with z0∈W⊆F−1[S(K,V)].

step 3.2step 4.1step 5.1
7.1

As z0 was an arbitrary point of F−1[S(K,V)], that set is open in Z; by step 3.1 this proves claim 2.

step 3.1step 6.1L8∎

Remarks

  • The tube lemma is the entire content. The condition defining F−1[S(K,V)] is "the whole slice K×{z} lands in V", and openness of that condition in z is exactly the statement that a neighbourhood of a slice contains a tube. Everything else is unwinding.

  • This half of the exponential law is the cheap half. It needs no hypothesis on X beyond compactness being available for its subsets, and none at all on Z or Y. The converse half — that every continuous F:Z→C(X,Y) arises from a continuous f — runs through continuity of the evaluation map and is where local compactness of X is spent.

  • The map F determines f and conversely, as functions. That the assignment f↦F is injective, and that under the local compactness hypothesis it is onto the continuous maps Z→C(X,Y), is the exponential law below; this theorem is the statement that the assignment lands in the right place.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources