Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A countable entourage base can be replaced in ZF by a decreasing symmetric base whose next triple composite lies in the preceding member

Statement

In ZF, every countably based uniformity has a decreasing symmetric base (En)(E_n) with En+13EnE_{n+1}^{\circ3}\subseteq E_n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A countable entourage base B\mathcal B.

[L1]

Symmetric entourages form a base and have square roots (Every uniformity has a base of symmetric entourages).

[L2]

A nonempty subset of N\mathbb N has a least element (The well-ordering principle).

[L3]

Recursion constructs a sequence from a specified starting value and successor map (The recursion theorem).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Use the finite listing or bijection supplied by countability to write the given base as (Cn)(C_n), repeating its last member in the finite case. Put Bn=in(CiCi1).B_n=\bigcap_{i\le n}(C_i\cap C_i^{-1}). Then (Bn)(B_n) is a canonically defined decreasing symmetric cofinal base.

L1construct
1.2

Define indices recursively. Put r0=0r_0=0, and let rn+1r_{n+1} be the least k>rnk>r_n such that Bk3BrnB_k^{\circ3}\subseteq B_{r_n}; then put En=BrnE_n=B_{r_n}.

L1L2L3construct
2.1

Each required set of indices is nonempty: choose a symmetric entourage DD with D3BrnD^{\circ3}\subseteq B_{r_n}, then use cofinality and decreasingness to find k>rnk>r_n with BkDB_k\subseteq D. Thus the recursion is defined. The inequalities rn+1>rnr_{n+1}>r_n give decreasingness and cofinality, while the defining clause gives triple control.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L2
3.1

Therefore (En)(E_n) is the asserted normal base in ZF.

step 2.1discharge-construct

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 33 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources